It's the Winds Man, It's the Winds Fault

ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
no, NASA warned of the effects of 400 PPM of CO2 on temperatures, a level not seen in the last 800,000 years which we have suddenly achieved in the last 100.

from there, i took what i knew of the effects of temperature on growing crops.

it was hard work, i tell ya.

kinda like figuring out that higher temperatures lead to higher sea levels which imperils coastal highways.

but hey, it won't be that hard to move an entire highway over a few feet, right?
Click to expand...
Why would you move the entire highway if you only need a few feet? Just expand it would make more sense wouldn't it?

Yes, there is the possibility of greater damage than just losing coastal highways.

I planted trees and take the bike more than the truck. You never thanked me for doing my part. I'll thank you in advance for all you've done, which is..?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
Why would you move the entire highway if you only need a few feet? Just expand it would make more sense wouldn't it?
Click to expand...
yes, let's just expand it into the face of that cliff.



or we can just eminent domain some folks out of their pride and joy.

no economic or humanitarian effects whatsoever, thanks to the clever and fast thinking of ginwilly the genius.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
yes, let's just expand it into the face of that cliff.



or we can just eminent domain some folks out of their pride and joy.

no economic or humanitarian effects whatsoever, thanks to the clever and fast thinking of ginwilly the genius.
Click to expand...
You're clearly unstable.

You're gay therefore Ginwilly wins.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
You're clearly unstable.

You're gay therefore Ginwilly wins.
Click to expand...
to state that human activities on the planet will have any effect on humans whatsoever is hyperbole and alarmism.

that highway will do just fine underwater, and of course lettuce will grow just fine in warmer conditions.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
to state that human activities on the planet will have any effect on humans whatsoever is hyperbole and alarmism.

that highway will do just fine underwater, and of course lettuce will grow just fine in warmer conditions.
Click to expand...
Who needs coral?

I'm sure the ocean acidification won't hurt.

It will be good for some ecosystems... Until it continues...
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
OK, so are you suggesting that global warming is good for some ecosystems?

That would mean you admit that the science does point to global warming, however, I will give you a pass and not assume you admit it is man made.
Click to expand...
What the hell are you talking about. You act all high and righteous and then completely misrepresent the position of the people who disagree with your radical platform.


WE ACKNOWLEDGE THERE IS HEATING AND COOLING

WHAT WE ARE ARGUING ABOUT IS

1. WHETHER IT IS BAD
2. WHETHER MAN HAS MUCH TO DO WITH IT.
3. WHETHER THE USA SHOULD PAY OUT OF POCKET TO ELIMINATE LOCAL POLLUTION WHILE CHINA IS PUTTING OUT MORE THAN AMERICA AND EUROPE COMBINED...

Now, stop acting like Uncle Buck and address the actual issues rather than misrepresent your opponents.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
What the hell are you talking about. You act all high and righteous and then completely misrepresent the position of the people who disagree with your radical platform.


WE ACKNOWLEDGE THERE IS HEATING AND COOLING

WHAT WE ARE ARGUING ABOUT IS

1. WHETHER IT IS BAD
2. WHETHER MAN HAS MUCH TO DO WITH IT.
3. WHETHER THE USA SHOULD PAY OUT OF POCKET TO ELIMINATE LOCAL POLLUTION WHILE CHINA IS PUTTING OUT MORE THAN AMERICA AND EUROPE COMBINED...

Now, stop acting like Uncle Buck and address the actual issues rather than misrepresent your opponents.
Click to expand...
Ok, so argue.

Cite something that bolsters (your claim?) that global warming is not bad.
Cite something that bolsters (your claim?) that man might not have much to do with it.


I have not claimed anything about the USA or China or financial solutions. So we should just stick to the two points you brought up. I'm only interested in what climate scientists have actually concluded.

"we acknowledge that there is heating and cooling"

When you throw in shit like that it makes me want to insult you. You are implying that you are conceding my stance, when I never said this. It is not cooling overall. There are peaks and valleys on the temperature graph, but overall, the trend is definitely toward warming.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Buck, why do you keep insisting that I'm a nurse when you've actually posted my occupation against my will here before?

have you posted personal info about so many people against their will you have us confused?
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
WE ACKNOWLEDGE THERE IS HEATING AND COOLING

1. WHETHER IT IS BAD
2. WHETHER MAN HAS MUCH TO DO WITH IT.
3. WHETHER THE USA SHOULD PAY OUT OF POCKET TO ELIMINATE LOCAL POLLUTION WHILE CHINA IS PUTTING OUT MORE THAN AMERICA AND EUROPE COMBINED...
Click to expand...
1. Heating is bad;

http://www.wunderground.com/climate/facts/negative_impacts.asp

http://www.nature.org/ourinitiatives/urgentissues/global-warming-climate-change/threats-impacts/

-higher temps
-changing landscapes
-wildlife at risk
-rising seas
-increased risk of drought, fire and floods
-stronger storms
-heat related illness and disease
-economic losses
-food/agriculture shortages

2. Man is the largest contributing factor in the last century;

"Statement on climate change from 18 scientific associations

"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver."

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

3. China is taking a leading role in the effort to curb greenhouse emissions by 40-45% by 2020;

"In separate remarks, China's vice premier Zhang reiterated the country's commitment to cutting its carbon intensity by 40 to 45 percent by 2020, and to increasing the share of non-fossil fuels in use there. He also said China would announce "as soon as we can" any additional actions it will take to cut emissions after the year 2020. And while he did not offer a more specific timeline, he said China "will also try to bring about the peaking of total CO2 emissions as early as possible."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/23/obama-climate-speech-un_n_5869830.html



Want to Disprove Man-Made Climate Change? A Scientist Will Give You $10,000 if You Can

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/06/25/want-to-disprove-man-made-climate-change-a-scientist-will-give-you-10000-if-you-can/
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
Buck, why do you keep insisting that I'm a nurse when you've actually posted my occupation against my will here before?

have you posted personal info about so many people against their will you have us confused?
Click to expand...
hey lying sack of shit,

please show me where i have posted your occupation.

that does not show up in any google search of "ginwilly", unlike much of the rest of your info.

your own damn fault.

thanks in advance,

buck.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
hey lying sack of shit,

please show me where i have posted your occupation.

that does not show up in any google search of "ginwilly", unlike much of the rest of your info.

your own damn fault.

thanks in advance,

buck.
Click to expand...
Wow, you are still sticking with you stalking me around the internet, joining a dating site and a poker site, posting all the info from profiles there which included profession, here on a site where we all enjoy what is illegal for most of us, is my fault?

Did you see how short her dress was judge?

You are a slimey POS.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
Wow, you are still sticking with you stalking me around the internet, joining a dating site and a poker site, posting all the info from profiles there which included profession, here on a site where we all enjoy what is illegal for most of us, is my fault?

Did you see how short her dress was judge?

You are a slimey POS.
Click to expand...
your dating website info under the name "ginwilly" is publicly available on a google search, no joining necessary.

yes, it is your fault that you chose the same name on a dating website, poker website, and pot website, ginwilly.

people who are not idiots take the bare minimum step of protecting their identity a little better.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top