you've still never told me where i have ever said the word "aggregate". this is my second time asking you about that, dumbass.
You didn't use the word aggregate and I never claimed you did. I don't recall you ever asking me about my use of the word, so I apologize if you did and I missed it somehow.
Initially you made a universal statement:
all work is voluntary and thus
all taxation is voluntary. I disputed this notion and you brought up welfare, suggesting that I have a choice between work and welfare. Your claim that I have a choice between work and welfare at an individual level is true, I certainly conceded that. But beyond the individual level, considering everyone together ("in aggregate"), I pointed out that if everyone has this choice and chooses welfare, the system would collapse, because there would be no sources of revenue or goods to support anyone. If everyone together cannot choose welfare, then not all work is voluntary, since it is impossible to for everyone to freely make that choice. Some level of work is necessary to support the system.
You suggested that some people choose to work, presumably providing everyone else with a free choice between work and welfare. I argued that it wasn't actually a free choice, that it was coerced by the certain knowledge that the system could not support everyone if everyone made a free choice.
Instead of addressing my reply at that point, you simply repeated your claim that some people choose to work and ignored my argument. Since you didn't substantively reply to my point, I didn't substantively reply to yours either.