Impaired driving changes could unfairly punish medical cannabis users, lawyers say
- Thread starter WHATFG
- Start date
except?
exempt maybe?
guess it would all depend on IF YOU WERE IMPAIRED OR NOT?!?!.,,,,,, eh,,,,,
WOW what are you on this evening?
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
Then you don't know much. Impaired is impaired. There is no exemption for having a paper that say's you are a patient. Much like driving impaired on opiates - that fact that it was prescribed doesn't mean you aren't a menace to others on the road.
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
HaHaHa...can you please record and post your experience explaining to the cops that you are NOT impaired because you are medical! That's about the dumbest thing anyone has ever posted on here...and there has been some dumb ones....
was it though? are you sure? you seem so sure about everything else here this evening...
MED FOLKS are subject to the same JAIL TIME as rec users
MED FOLKS are being criminalized because our government cant deal with us MMAR folks..GET IT?
Read the news!
n3fta
Well-Known Member
Post a link of a DUI as the the result of Pharma? I don't wan't people driving on heavy pharma, but they do. Prove me wrong and I'll be happy to admit I'm wrong.
n3fta
Well-Known Member
So, you turn a typo into whatever the fuck you trying to prove here? I said none of these things.
what part of SAME JAIL TIME AS REC did you miss out on?
fell out of the dummy tree and hit every branch on the way down ..eh
prove otherwise
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
Here's a few links to check out - Then you can tell me how I'm wrong. lol You should get someone to show you how to use google, it'll save you from posting rubbish.
https://lifesafer.ca/blog/driving-while-using-prescription-drugs-in-canada/
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/why-it-s-so-hard-to-fight-drug-impaired-driving-1.3050984
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
Sorry, I forgot about your limited internet skills. I haven't bothered to research actual court cases and convictions - you'll have to get your mom to help you with that. If you had bothered to read the article before posting your childish comments, you might have found your answer. I've taken a paragraph from the cbc article I posted for you a few minutes ago that shows 1,159 drug-impaired driving charges in 2013.
You stated "NO DUI FOR MEDICAL. NO DUI FOR PHARMA" and "Prove me wrong and I'll be happy to admit I'm wrong."....
I'm waiting.
Figures from Statistics Canada show that the number of people charged by Canadian police forces with drug-impaired driving offences, including impaired operation causing death or bodily harm, along with impaired operation of a vehicle, vessel or aircraft, rose from 183 in 2008 to 1,159 in 2013. (Over the same period, the number of people charged with impaired driving fell from 65,822 to 53,944.)
You stated "NO DUI FOR MEDICAL. NO DUI FOR PHARMA" and "Prove me wrong and I'll be happy to admit I'm wrong."....
I'm waiting.
Figures from Statistics Canada show that the number of people charged by Canadian police forces with drug-impaired driving offences, including impaired operation causing death or bodily harm, along with impaired operation of a vehicle, vessel or aircraft, rose from 183 in 2008 to 1,159 in 2013. (Over the same period, the number of people charged with impaired driving fell from 65,822 to 53,944.)
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
still waiting...