If they come for your guns, do you have a responsibility to fight?

R

rooky1985

Active Member
I would sell back guns that the majority population deemed unecessary to own. All guns is to much to ask, I feel that would severely jeapordize the future of lawmaking and create a impracticall amount of power for our government.
 
zambonic

zambonic

Well-Known Member
The majority does not rule in this country. We have a document that has strict guide lines our elected reps are to be following. Now we have a president that is talking executive order. Remember way back in 2007 a certain canidate that was putting Bush down for using executive orders.

rooky1985 said:
I would sell back guns that the majority population deemed unecessary to own. All guns is to much to ask, I feel that would severely jeapordize the future of lawmaking and create a impracticall amount of power for our government.
Click to expand...
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
zambonic said:
The majority does not rule in this country. We have a document that has strict guide lines our elected reps are to be following. Now we have a president that is talking executive order. Remember way back in 2007 a certain canidate that was putting Bush down for using executive orders.
Click to expand...
*guidelines
*candidate
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
tripstick said:
The whole reason of the 2nd Admendment is to protect us from the peole who would seek to see us protected.
Click to expand...
that's a reason, not the reason and certainly not the whole reason.

edit: and since we're not talking muskets and cannon balls anymore, it's the most outdated by far.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
UncleBuck said:
that's a reason, not the reason and certainly not the whole reason.

edit: and since we're not talking muskets and cannon balls anymore, it's the most outdated by far.
Click to expand...
My question is, can you show where the Second was limited to weapons of the time? I read it as being "open" to the indefinite future.
 
R

rooky1985

Active Member
UncleBuck said:
how many guns do you need to be secure? :lol:
Click to expand...
I think that all depends on who you are, where you are, and what you have been doing LOL. But seriously if more anti-gun enthusiast would promote other options varying from "give us all your guns", the gun enthusiast would find there arguments more relevant. I don't think assault weapons will be banned (to many gun enthusiast on capitol hill) but, I believe they will focus efforts on banning high capacity mags.
 
R

rooky1985

Active Member
zambonic said:
The majority does not rule in this country. We have a document that has strict guide lines our elected reps are to be following. Now we have a president that is talking executive order. Remember way back in 2007 a certain canidate that was putting Bush down for using executive orders.
Click to expand...
I understand that is just what I would require to relinquish certain firearms that I own.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
rooky1985 said:
I think that all depends on who you are, where you are, and what you have been doing LOL. But seriously if more anti-gun enthusiast would promote other options varying from "give us all your guns", the gun enthusiast would find there arguments more relevant. I don't think assault weapons will be banned (to many gun enthusiast on capitol hill) but, I believe they will focus efforts on banning high capacity mags.
Click to expand...
name one person in power proposing "give us all your guns".

you're being irrational, delusional, and paranoid. the mark of most gun nuts.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
My question is, can you show where the Second was limited to weapons of the time? I read it as being "open" to the indefinite future.
Click to expand...
they gave us the reason for arms: to protect the security of a free state. pretty sure they were talking about keeping king george off our backs.

we have a standing army now.
 
zambonic

zambonic

Well-Known Member
And may I ask what "to protect the security of a free state" means to a person such as yourself?

UncleBuck said:
they gave us the reason for arms: to protect the security of a free state. pretty sure they were talking about keeping king george off our backs.

we have a standing army now.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top