amsterdam2015
Well-Known Member
Then why does this not happen with all strains?
If the chemical compounds are the same in every plant, just in different ratios, surely given a certain amount of time each and every strain will turn amber, and this does not happen with all strains.
Also, how can it be said that amber represents a loss of 90% potency - in the way of THC, when I have sampled time and time again, 100% amber trichome covered flowers that got me incredibly high, not just couch locked.
I have seen that someone sampled THC inside of a clear trichome head and cloudy one and the clear has a higher amount of THC, would it be safe to assume that this is a poor way to determine active chemicals?
I do not think the clear heads would have a higher amount of psychoactive chemicals, maybe just a higher amount of testable precursors? Which then leads people to thinking that the best time to harvest is earlier in the window, for maximum "high"
A hate seeing all the talk about how amber is a negative degradation only, with nothing to back up that claim.
Do we know when all the terpenes develop? I know during drying and curing they polymerise to form different compounds (which is why the smell changes) but I dont know when these are produced en masse.
When is the precursor to the terpenes created, is it late in the flowering, or right at the start? Are terpenes always more pronounced on strains left to ripen fully?
Could an abundance of terpenes be responsible for the colour change inside of a trichome, as apposed to it simply being THC > CBN degradation (which I do not believe at all)
Why do tests done on strains with 50% amber trichomes still only show negligible amounts of CBN? If this was THC degrading it should be substantially higher, or at least increase at a relative rate to the THC being destroyed, which in all tests I have seen it does not.
I am convinced amber trichomes are not degraded THC.
All this before 9am!
If the chemical compounds are the same in every plant, just in different ratios, surely given a certain amount of time each and every strain will turn amber, and this does not happen with all strains.
Also, how can it be said that amber represents a loss of 90% potency - in the way of THC, when I have sampled time and time again, 100% amber trichome covered flowers that got me incredibly high, not just couch locked.
I have seen that someone sampled THC inside of a clear trichome head and cloudy one and the clear has a higher amount of THC, would it be safe to assume that this is a poor way to determine active chemicals?
I do not think the clear heads would have a higher amount of psychoactive chemicals, maybe just a higher amount of testable precursors? Which then leads people to thinking that the best time to harvest is earlier in the window, for maximum "high"
A hate seeing all the talk about how amber is a negative degradation only, with nothing to back up that claim.
Do we know when all the terpenes develop? I know during drying and curing they polymerise to form different compounds (which is why the smell changes) but I dont know when these are produced en masse.
When is the precursor to the terpenes created, is it late in the flowering, or right at the start? Are terpenes always more pronounced on strains left to ripen fully?
Could an abundance of terpenes be responsible for the colour change inside of a trichome, as apposed to it simply being THC > CBN degradation (which I do not believe at all)
Why do tests done on strains with 50% amber trichomes still only show negligible amounts of CBN? If this was THC degrading it should be substantially higher, or at least increase at a relative rate to the THC being destroyed, which in all tests I have seen it does not.
I am convinced amber trichomes are not degraded THC.
All this before 9am!