NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
This is an incredibly efficient way to spend development dollars. I am not sure the government should be doing it but compared with what they waste now this is a much better system.
I thought you guys were "winning"...?
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
I'm not afraid to cite it, John Cook 2004 is a peer reviewed study by 9 authors. It is an analysis of thousands of peer reviewed studies.I see you're now embarrassed to cite your source, is it because John Cook is a blogger and cartoon illustrator and not a scientist.
Why are you so convinced that all you have to do is point out that he only has a bachelor's in physics and not a PhD? Do you think that renders his arguments invalid? That's ad hominem.
earnest_voice
Well-Known Member
So it literally took you hours to copy and paste your responses?
I call you out for the unattributed copy and pastes and your response is "so what?" When you resort to plagiarism - you have no argument. It is that simple. When you consider the context of this discussion you're on par with Al Gore.
Ceepea
Well-Known Member
It doesn't matter how many independent scientists and organizations agree that ACC is undoubtedly happening, or how insanely weighted the scale is (with evidence) in favor of ACC.
These dumb asses are just going to plug their ears, and cover their eyes..... (I wish they'd cover their mouths too, but that's asking for too much) and spew their borderline retarded arguments.
http://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm
To those who still doubt co2 is even a greenhouse gas;
For a (brief and incomplete) historical look at how many papers have been published on greenhouse gasses and the research that's been done, simply scroll to the bottom of the link and view the published papers regarding greenhouse gasses.
Papers started being published in 1856.....
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Be careful, someone might call you crazy or a pederast or plagiarist. They certainly won't explicate your argument or god forbid, put forth an argument of their own and they definitely won't provide citations.
jahbrudda
Well-Known Member
Dude,be honest, he's a cartoonist and blogger, that is it.
Ceepea
Well-Known Member
Heartland Institute...
Conservative think tank that's funded by big oil and tobacco companies. LAWL.
Nice.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
I don't care if he is a five year old retard, the argument is valid.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
400K+ in NYC over the weekend
"The People's Climate March (PCM) was a large-scale activist event to advocate global action against climate change, which took place on Sunday, September 21, 2014, in New York City. With over 400,000 participants, it was the largest climate march in history."
LOL!
"The People's Climate March (PCM) was a large-scale activist event to advocate global action against climate change, which took place on Sunday, September 21, 2014, in New York City. With over 400,000 participants, it was the largest climate march in history."
LOL!
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
"
Galileo Galilei (Italian pronunciation: [ɡaliˈlɛːo ɡaliˈlɛi]; 15 February 1564[3] – 8 January 1642), often known mononymously as Galileo, was an Italian physicist, mathematician, engineer, astronomer, and philosopher who played a major role in the scientific revolution. His achievements include improvements to the telescope and consequent astronomical observations and support for Copernicanism. Galileo has been called the "father of modernobservational astronomy",[4] the "father of modern physics",[5][6] the "father of science",[6][7] and "the Father of Modern Science".[8]
His contributions to observational astronomy include the telescopic confirmation of the phases of Venus, the discovery of the four largest satellites of Jupiter (named the Galilean moons in his honour), and the observation and analysis of sunspots. Galileo also worked in applied science and technology, inventing an improved military compass and other instruments.
Galileo's championing of heliocentrism was controversial within his lifetime, a time when most subscribed to either geocentrism or the Tychonic system.[9] He met with opposition from astronomers, who doubted heliocentrism due to the absence of an observed stellar parallax.[9] The matter was investigated by the Roman Inquisition in 1615, which concluded that heliocentrism was false and contrary to scripture, placing works advocating the Copernican system on the index of banned books and forbidding Galileo from advocating heliocentrism.[9][10] Galileo later defended his views in Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, which appeared to attack Pope Urban VIII, thus alienating not only the Pope but also the Jesuits, both of whom had supported Galileo up until this point.[9] He was tried by the Holy Office, then found "vehemently suspect of heresy", was forced to recant, and spent the rest of his life under house arrest.[11][12] It was while Galileo was under house arrest that he wrote one of his finest works, Two New Sciences, in which he summarised the work he had done some forty years earlier, on the two sciences now called kinematics and strength of materials.[13][14]"
I can find plenty more evidence of scientists who went against the common wisdom who were jailed, even killed because they did not agree with the consensus.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Why don't you cite some science then?
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
"Common wisdom" isn't science
jahbrudda
Well-Known Member
Citation??
Yep.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Yeah, the conservative gods control physics. Do you have any idea how stupid you sound.
jahbrudda
Well-Known Member
Dude, you haven't cited one scientific study yet, but want everyone else to.
lame.