Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
All humans are the same, biased. That's why I want technocracy. Machines at least have the potential for no bias, humans have zero chance.
How true is this article?
- Thread starter sync0s
- Start date
tomahawk2406
Well-Known Member
the speach wasnt all that riviting.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
We apparently agree that corruption is the common flaw of all forms of government. Bias is a form of corruption.
sync0s
Well-Known Member
Where is the potential for no bias? I fail to see it.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Why all the animosity towards our electronic friends? It knows no hatred, bigotry or racism. James Cameron really fucked you up!
sync0s
Well-Known Member
A computer can't independently identify hatred, bigotry, or racism, thus it needs to be programmed what to look for. This is where the bias comes in to play.
I just think it's foolish to say "Well humans can't do it, and even though humans program computers, they're more trustworthy and have no bias! So, therefore, let's trust in them to run our lives for us!"
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
You might as well move to some third world country. Doctors already use IDSS. Those evil intelligent agent computer programs have already taken over health care!
sync0s
Well-Known Member
Your acronym yields way to many possibilities. Don't bother, however, it was a failed attempt at a straw man.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
You win. Your vast amount of artificial intelligence experience dwarfs mine.
deprave
New Member
As a software developer I have to point out to you that the majority of programming is telling the program what to do if it fucks up or if the user fucks up. Computers do exactly what you tell them to do and thats actually a serious problem and the majoirty of the work in programming is working around that.
Example: Okay do this but if this and this is true do this instead but if this and this and this and this and this or this and that or this this and that happens do this instead.
So the biggest problem is people telling it to do the wrong thing or not being specific enough.....You get my drift....and a very simple tak has so many varibables and conditions this makes it impossible to program something very advanced correctly and most importantly effeciently and without error.
Example: Okay do this but if this and this is true do this instead but if this and this and this and this and this or this and that or this this and that happens do this instead.
So the biggest problem is people telling it to do the wrong thing or not being specific enough.....You get my drift....and a very simple tak has so many varibables and conditions this makes it impossible to program something very advanced correctly and most importantly effeciently and without error.
really comfy slippers
Active Member
Actually Congressman Paul is the only candidate who's lifestyle and voting record don't contradict his political platform
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Yeah, they're called catch and throws. If you do AI work, you'd know it's mostly premade packages where all that has been taken care of long ago using shell programs to test those interfaces. Most of AI work is the calculations and rule sets. It's more complicated than that, but no where near your doom and gloom. People working on majorly huge and advanced projects in AI rarely have problems getting programs working like planned. The problem is finding the correct method and idea. If those aren't correct, the best programming ain't doing shit. AI's problem is our detective skills and reverse engineering about the nature of how human like intelligence works, sucks.