How Evolution Works via SuperMario3

reddan1981

Well-Known Member
In your opinion, is neurological evolution best displayed in the thought processes displayed by;
a, progressive movement (I use progressive as the political and economic strategy named 'progressive economics', not in its literal meaning)
b, Conservative (following all ideologies)
c, Critical thinkers.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
In your opinion, is neurological evolution best displayed in the thought processes displayed by;
a, progressive movement (I use progressive as the political and economic strategy named 'progressive economics', not in its literal meaning)
b, Conservative (following all ideologies)
c, Critical thinkers.
Progressive. The clip in the OP sort of proves that. If you move traditionally, you won't progress past the first point of defeat. If you learn which point causes defeat, and progress past that through movement (jumping, sliding, twisting, in the case of SM3), you will reach another point of contention. Progress past that, move further, etc. til you reach the end
 

reddan1981

Well-Known Member
Ok, I will attempt to explain my thinking on this subject, my assumption is you will struggle to understand my tone, this will be partly because I struggle with literacy but partly it will be due to parameters you have already set for yourself. I will continue with my assumptions (I invite correction) by saying I believe you are not employed by an 'establishment' in anyway connected to your political beliefs. My assumption is you understand the suppression that is caused by linear thinking. Something we would both agree on is, as a species wanting to avert serious consequences we need change. We need societal reform. Because of the complexities involved in this type of conversation I am going to limit my explanation exclusively to how I believe critical thinking, non categorized persons are the natural progression of thought, as such is a demonstration of neurological evolution (if such a process occurs).
I hope I will find no argument from you when I say this. Societies are constructed. The main purpose for constructing a society is to aid in the expansion of trade roots, territory and to build a consumer base. Unless of course you are of the belief that society is a consequence of population growth? Regardless, most people invite the thought of living in society, a society progressing towards a better way of living. As a willing participant of society we accept a certain amount of structure, after all it is part of a reciprocation process that benefits us in numerous ways. Where I believe we have digressed is, we are too quick to accept authority over us without first verifying the intent of that authority. We have no clear objectives as a species. We have allowed ourselves to be hoodwinked with misinformation. As an example I will sheepishly attempt to explain a critical thinkers thoughts on racism, one might say that because I am white, I have benefited from racism, as racism is systemic in the culture system I am categorized to, right?
Well one of many misinformation topics that draws us away from the real truth is this premise that whites (as a collective) were responsible for slave trade. You might understand this is not the case but many do not. for those that think otherwise let me ask this, how could the every day person struggling to survive in the societal system, afford the shipping, ownership fee and housing for a slave or multiple slaves? The answer is they couldn't. Leaders of expansionist policies could though and what does a person require to become a leader? Inspirational direction and ideas? No. Influence and money and the willingness to conform to their peers (unelected or elected alike). The framework for societies have long been drawn. The rich classes of yesteryear still monopolize. They have used expansionism under the guise of ' trade root' building to accumulate historical evidence. Historical evidence they then doctor or omitted from us. They use a myriad of deceptions to keep us uniformed, disorientated and disconnected from one another (the topic of racism being one, religion another of many). ive waffled on a bit (wake and bake) and nearly missed my point. The use of the word progression to define a political movement is deceiving. Real progression is outside the mandate of the controllers of government. Real progression as a species would require absolute restructure, and possibly the eradication of money as a trade and labour enticement.
 
Last edited:

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I'm not exactly sure how politics comes into this, it's more just another way to show how the process of evolution by natural selection works, instead of using successive generations of organisms, they used the successive generations of lives played
 

DaSprout

Well-Known Member
Interesting subject. That has piqued my intersest.

A timeless meandering that is viewed through the guise of SM3.

It is always, and will ever be the same.

Not everyone moves forward at the same pace.

Institutions, bureaucracy, barriers, are put in place as natural societal obstacles which must be overcome. Much like SM3.

The Koopas, the troopas. The mushrooms , toads, and Bowser. They all have meaning. Though they may seem to be derived from the subconscious of an average everyday game-encoder. They serve to communicate a deeper, cross cultural view, that transcends race and prior popular cultural beliefs.

We, us few, us many, see the same thing. Shhhhhhh. We know.
 
Top