Highest-paid CEOs run worst-performing companies, research finds

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member



The highest-paid CEOs tend to run some of the worst-performing companies, according to new research.

The study, carried out by corporate research firm MSCI, found that for every $100 (£76) invested in companies with the highest-paid CEOs would have grown to $265 (£202) over 10 years.

But the same amount invested in the companies with the lowest-paid CEOs would have grown to $367 (£279) over a decade.


Full story here


Wait a minute.. Don't conservatives repeatedly tell us that excessive CEO pay buys results? More return for the investors?
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
It naturally follows that we should cut politicians pay so their performance goes up!!!

I vote for a 70% cut in pay across the board!!!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It naturally follows that we should cut politicians pay so their performance goes up!!!

I vote for a 70% cut in pay across the board!!!
well, you've already led by example on that one, but i don't think i will be joining you.
 

spandy

Well-Known Member
More pay ins't a motivating factor of higher level performance. Just means they can buy more shit when they get off work.

Probably why McDonalds is replacing as many employees as possible with machines to avoid the backlash of a 15 dollar minimum wage...
 

spandy

Well-Known Member
Oh, this is hilarious!
Why? Your own topic says this to be true. Why wouldn't it be true on the bottom end as well?

Just paid a guy 80 bucks to weed the parking lot and back lot. Guy did a piss poor job, spent 6 hours doing what usually takes me about 90 minutes, on top of bitching about the heat. 80 bucks for a 90 min job is a hell of a rate, yet I got shit for results.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Why? Your own topic says this to be true. Why wouldn't it be true on the bottom end as well?

Just paid a guy 80 bucks to weed the parking lot and back lot. Guy did a piss poor job, spent 6 hours doing what usually takes me about 90 minutes, on top of bitching about the heat. 80 bucks for a 90 min job is a hell of a rate, yet I got shit for results.
That says more about your judgment than it does about anything else. I know if I paid a guy $80 for a couple hours worth of work, I wouldn't be complaining about the quality
 

oswizzle

Well-Known Member
most of all these CEO's are Parasitic Zionist Scum Bags .. they steal American Wealth and destroy are economy ..

How many pro sport teams are owned by actual White People and not Jews? hint hint.. not many
 

CaptainCAVEMAN

Well-Known Member



The highest-paid CEOs tend to run some of the worst-performing companies, according to new research.

The study, carried out by corporate research firm MSCI, found that for every $100 (£76) invested in companies with the highest-paid CEOs would have grown to $265 (£202) over 10 years.

But the same amount invested in the companies with the lowest-paid CEOs would have grown to $367 (£279) over a decade.


Full story here


Wait a minute.. Don't conservatives repeatedly tell us that excessive CEO pay buys results? More return for the investors?
Intetesting. Thanks man
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Why? Your own topic says this to be true. Why wouldn't it be true on the bottom end as well?

Just paid a guy 80 bucks to weed the parking lot and back lot. Guy did a piss poor job, spent 6 hours doing what usually takes me about 90 minutes, on top of bitching about the heat. 80 bucks for a 90 min job is a hell of a rate, yet I got shit for results.
maybe because you're a shithead and people don't like you.
 

althor

Well-Known Member
I will never get over the previous CEO of Home Depot. Home Depot was huge and buildings going up all over the place and making money hand over fist. Then they hire this CEO that turns it into a nose dive. Within a couple of years Home Depot was horrible, so they fire this CEO and give him a 325 million dollar severance.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I will never get over the previous CEO of Home Depot. Home Depot was huge and buildings going up all over the place and making money hand over fist. Then they hire this CEO that turns it into a nose dive. Within a couple of years Home Depot was horrible, so they fire this CEO and give him a 325 million dollar severance.
How did they justify that bullshit?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
simple solution.............stop buying their shit.

the only vote that counts.............your wallet
Makes zero difference. Even if the company goes belly up, the CEO still gets a golden parachute and lands in a soft pillow of cash. Why? Because he's on the boards of the same people who are on his board, and they all happily collude on each other's salaries forever after!

Great gig if you can sucker people into hiring your cronies onto their boards.

Who loses? Only those poor sods down there on the shop floor who actually did the work to build the company. They get the shaft every time! But you know- they're losers. The Chump said so.
 
Top