GOP-led report debunks Benghazi theories

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Pada.

I think there is a channel or two for you already. You should be happy about it. The left carrying on about how much one net work lie's is getting old and it won't take away any viewers. If anything it will add more viewers to fox news. Over the next two years there will be more and more people trusting Fox News as a news source. In my opinion.

Feel free to remind me next year if the ratings go down or something. Happy news watching.
meltdown.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Pada.

I think there is a channel or two for you already. You should be happy about it. The left carrying on about how much one net work lie's is getting old and it won't take away any viewers. If anything it will add more viewers to fox news. Over the next two years there will be more and more people trusting Fox News as a news source. In my opinion.

Feel free to remind me next year if the ratings go down or something. Happy news watching.
You're delusional. Fox has been on it's way out since the internet became mainstream. Do you know how many views a newtwork like TYT gets in one month alone?

I don't watch news on TV because I know it's establishment news selling an agenda, just like Fox News. You seem to think it's some kind of team sport to root for against the other guys you disagree with, which is detrimental to you, but at least it makes you feel good..
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
They have the most viewers who are also the least informed. So when you make the claim "low information voter", it's scientifically accurate to say that would be Fox News viewers. Someone who watches no news at all is more informed than people who watch Fox News.

Shocking.

Also, the average age of a Fox News viewer is 68 years old, so rofl @ that..
You keep believing those progressive studies of yours Paddy.
I think it's hilarious that you think you are more intelligent because of you ideals.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You keep believing those progressive studies of yours Paddy.
I think it's hilarious that you think you are more intelligent because of you ideals.
those are actually scientific studies, beenthere.

keep having a meltdown and dismissing science you don't agree with as progressive.

that's exactly what a low information, unintelligent racist would do.
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
those are actually scientific studies, beenthere.

keep having a meltdown and dismissing science you don't agree with as progressive.

that's exactly what a low information, unintelligent racist would do.
Scientific, really.
So what kind of intelligence do liberals excel in?
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
You keep believing those progressive studies of yours Paddy.
I think it's hilarious that you think you are more intelligent because of you ideals.
Anything you disagree with you label "leftist/liberal/progressive/socialist/marxist/communist/etc.", which doesn't invalidate any of it

You hate science for the same reasons because it consistently defeats the positions you believe in. Jesus, evolution, abortion, homosexuality, the war on drugs.. and on and on..
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Scientific, really.
yes, really. with a margin of error and everything.

do you want to go over the methodology? want to review what questions they asked self-identified viewers of each station and how they answered, beenthere?

because i would love to review the methodology and see why you describe it as "progressive" when the fact is that it is scientific.

you little racist fuckface bitch.
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
yes, really. with a margin of error and everything.

do you want to go over the methodology? want to review what questions they asked self-identified viewers of each station and how they answered, beenthere?

because i would love to review the methodology and see why you describe it as "progressive" when the fact is that it is scientific.

you little racist fuckface bitch.
So you can't tell me what kind of intelligence they're referring to huh, I didn't think so.
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
Anything you disagree with you label "leftist/liberal/progressive/socialist/marxist/communist/etc.", which doesn't invalidate any of it

You hate science for the same reasons because it consistently defeats the positions you believe in. Jesus, evolution, abortion, homosexuality, the war on drugs.. and on and on..
Dude, who did the study?
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Dude, who did the study?
It wouldn't matter to you if NASA, MIT, Cambridge, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Colombia, CalTech, Texas Tech, Berkley, 34 national academies of science and the rest of the top academic institutions in the entire fucking world conducted the study, you would label it as leftist/liberal/socialist/progressive/communist, etc. if it disagreed with your preconceived worldview, just like every other conservatard does. But when those same institutions release something you think agrees with any of your positions, you're happy to cite them like a happy idiot.. Doesn't work that way..

Your positions amount to "they're right because I agree with em!" "they're wrong because I disagree with em!", and it's transparent enough for anyone to see. You're a partisan person for the republican party, and it's blatantly obvious.
 

nitro harley

Well-Known Member
You're delusional. Fox has been on it's way out since the internet became mainstream. Do you know how many views a newtwork like TYT gets in one month alone?

I don't watch news on TV because I know it's establishment news selling an agenda, just like Fox News. You seem to think it's some kind of team sport to root for against the other guys you disagree with, which is detrimental to you, but at least it makes you feel good..
Pada.

I am not familiar with TYT? I am glad you get there news, thats great. I feel great, and I can see why you would think it was a team sport. I was a registered Democrat for decades until I started paying attention and growing a business. It is starting to look like the party of sheep from where I am at, but thats my opinion. Your point of view is interesting but not something I would ever take serious. No offense.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Pada.

I am not familiar with TYT? I am glad you get there news, thats great. I feel great, and I can see why you would think it was a team sport. I was a registered Democrat for decades until I started paying attention and growing a business. It is starting to look like the party of sheep from where I am at, but thats my opinion. Your point of view is interesting but not something I would ever take serious. No offense.
you mean to say "until i inherited my daddy's boat".
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Pada.

I am not familiar with TYT? I am glad you get there news, thats great. I feel great, and I can see why you would think it was a team sport. I was a registered Democrat for decades until I started paying attention and growing a business. It is starting to look like the party of sheep from where I am at, but thats my opinion. Your point of view is interesting but not something I would ever take serious. No offense.
You think it's a team sport. That's why you root for the republicans. I know that's an effective tactic designed to divide the population, because it's easier for the establishment to defeat an enemy if they divide their forces. The fight is up/down, not left/right. You and me are, sadly, part of the same team. You don't understand this because the bullshit you watch tells you we're enemies and you believe every word of it. We face the same problems perpetuated by the same force, and it doesn't matter if a dem or rep is in office, the same problems persist. Maybe if you could see the forest for the trees you'd understand, but you won't, because you don't want to.

 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
It doesn't matter where it comes from, you disagree with the premise, so you dismiss the conclusion because you're an intellectually dishonest person who sides with political bias

Nothing matters to you unless it confirms your bias

Your opinions can automatically be thrown out the window, and anything you support decreases its credibility because you support it
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Take this for example;

"Considering FDU’s undergraduate school is ranked as one of the worst in the country,” the Fox spokesperson told The Hollywood Reporter, “we suggest the school invest in improving its weak academic program instead of spending money on frivolous polling – their student body does not deserve to be so ill-informed."

As if, to Fox, rankings matter. Where are they with this statement when the top academic institutions in the entire world agree with the IPCC's conclusions that ACC is real and is a significant problem?

They turn the argument to "liberal universities" and corrupt scientists lying for government grants.. This is a perfect example of the way Fox News lies to it's viewers. They pretend like had the study come from some top university, well then, we'd all just believe it because they're respected! But then when something does come out of those top institutions that they disagree with, well now it's all just bullshit and some liberal conspiracy...

Do you see how that works? Just like you, it wouldn't matter where it came from, that's not the issue, and you know it, you dishonest piece of shit.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Pada.

I think there is a channel or two for you already. You should be happy about it. The left carrying on about how much one net work lie's is getting old and it won't take away any viewers. If anything it will add more viewers to fox news. Over the next two years there will be more and more people trusting Fox News as a news source. In my opinion.

Feel free to remind me next year if the ratings go down or something. Happy news watching.
Rupert Murdoch is 100% for immigration reform and AMNESTY

Dont make predictions you are not very good at it
 
Top