The first 8 minute clip I posted destroys your entire argument
You're not a scientist, and I suspect you have a very basic understanding of how it works. You certainly don't understand how radiation or nuclear reactors work
"Containing radiation equivalent to 14,000 times the amount released in the atomic bomb attack on Hiroshima 68 years ago"
It's a video of a real scientist explaining why the nonsense you posted in the OP couldn't possibly be happening. You are exaggerating the event, and not just a little bit.
Not to worry the Japs have plenty of experience handling nuclear fallout. The got the big lesson on radiation in 1945
Funny coming from someone with a terrorist avatar. Of course if allah didn't say it then it must not be true.
5 years? Well fuck that sounds like a life time.
Ok, I watched you "evidence" that any talk of danger is all hype. You have some guy (who did nto list his credentials) talking about some guy (who did not list his credentials) on a youtube video for "AMTV" something I have never heard of.
i agree clayton, while some of what we hear might be overhyped or w/e, surely 100 metric tons of highly contaminated water can not be a good thing, and anyone who argues otherwise, well, that's on them i guess..
No, of course not, apparently. Padawantorapeher thinks Chernobyl was a minor problem too.
that'd be a no clayton..
I certainly dont know what the actual numbers are, but lets say that at least half of the scientists are working for various govts. How much of the worst of the info gathered by those govts. does anyone think that those govts. will allow to be released? Just asking.
where is that guys other hand at? is he masturbating?
