Flip the roles, how would America react?

pnwmystery

Well-Known Member
In order:

I like Texas.

I wouldn't be anywhere near a church, for any reason.

I would be concerned, that guy has a fully automatic AK47 and is illegal to open carry, unlike the perfectly legal semi-automatic in the first post.

I haven't pissed myself in 40+ years, unlikely.

Because he is open carrying a legal firearm and not breaking any laws?

No, they're not. See above.
It's illegal when it's carried in a manner "calculated to cause alarm." What do you think this guy is doing? He's openly carrying his rifle in a way to intimidate people going to a Mosque. This pretty much falls in line with terrorism.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
It's illegal when it's carried in a manner "calculated to cause alarm." What do you think this guy is doing? He's openly carrying his rifle in a way to intimidate people going to a Mosque. This pretty much falls in line with terrorism.
Well, you'd need the ability to read his mind to definitively say he was doing it to cause alarm. What if he is a concerned citizen, making sure the worshippers were free to practice their faith in the current environment of Islamaphobia (not a real word by the way)? Jumping to conclusions is what made all the libtards on RIU look extra ignorant on the Duke lacrosse fiasco, George Zimmerman, Darren Wilson, Zimmerman again, Zimmerman again, etc...
 

pnwmystery

Well-Known Member
Well, you'd need the ability to read his mind to definitively say he was doing it to cause alarm. What if he is a concerned citizen, making sure the worshippers were free to practice their faith in the current environment of Islamaphobia (not a real word by the way)? Jumping to conclusions is what made all the libtards on RIU look extra ignorant on the Duke lacrosse fiasco, George Zimmerman, Darren Wilson, Zimmerman again, Zimmerman again, etc...
Because they explicitly stated they were there to protest Islam, the mosque, and wanted Islam to be illegal in the United States. :D
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Because they explicitly stated they were there to protest Islam, the mosque, and wanted Islam to be illegal in the United States. :D
I didn't get all that from one photo.

I don't know what the laws in Texas say about open carry at a legal protest. I don't think the right to arm yourself for defense ends because you choose to conduct a formal protest. Did they have placards and march in a group chanting boorish platitudes? Did they stink like an Occupy Wallstreet sit in?

The actual intent of open carry laws are to make it known you don't have the right to be frightened or threatened by someone simply being in your presence with a firearm. Unless they are pointing it or making suggestive actions with it, people offended or scared by them are invited to fuck right off. Now, liberals and PIGS try to undermine the law rather than go through the process of trying to have it changed by claiming walking down the street with it is "brandishing" it, but, that's bullshit and even they know it.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I didn't get all that from one photo.

I don't know what the laws in Texas say about open carry at a legal protest. I don't think the right to arm yourself for defense ends because you choose to conduct a formal protest. Did they have placards and march in a group chanting boorish platitudes? Did they stink like an Occupy Wallstreet sit in?

The actual intent of open carry laws are to make it known you don't have the right to be frightened or threatened by someone simply being in your presence with a firearm. Unless they are pointing it or making suggestive actions with it, people offended or scared by them are invited to fuck right off. Now, liberals and PIGS try to undermine the law rather than go through the process of trying to have it changed by claiming walking down the street with it is "brandishing" it, but, that's bullshit and even they know it.
It's hilarious watching you try to make this identical situation OK for white Christians but not OK for brown Muslims. That'd be a pretty good indication that you're using two separate standards for two different groups of people solely based on your personal prejudices of them
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
The irony is that he doesnt even realize that radical islam is absolutely less tolerant than the man in the picture.

If the roles had been reversed the christian woman would already be dead like tens of thousands of other christians in that part of the world.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
It's hilarious watching you try to make this identical situation OK for white Christians but not OK for brown Muslims. That'd be a pretty good indication that you're using two separate standards for two different groups of people solely based on your personal prejudices of them
What's hilarious is how you posed the question, answered it for me, rebutted the response you provided and are now bringing it up again to lecture me on a position I never took.

That ain't just a straw man, it's a Straw Titan.
 

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
What's hilarious is how you posed the question, answered it for me, rebutted the response you provided and are now bringing it up again to lecture me on a position I never took.

That ain't just a straw man, it's a Straw Titan.

Guard your crops!
On a scale from 1 to 10, where do your dogs sit? With 1 being a watch dog, 5 is a guard dog, and 10 is a man eater
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
What's hilarious is how you posed the question, answered it for me, rebutted the response you provided and are now bringing it up again to lecture me on a position I never took.

That ain't just a straw man, it's a Straw Titan.
I don't know what the laws in Texas say about open carry at a legal protest. I don't think the right to arm yourself for defense ends because you choose to conduct a formal protest. Did they have placards and march in a group chanting boorish platitudes? Did they stink like an Occupy Wallstreet sit in?

The actual intent of open carry laws are to make it known you don't have the right to be frightened or threatened by someone simply being in your presence with a firearm. Unless they are pointing it or making suggestive actions with it, people offended or scared by them are invited to fuck right off. Now, liberals and PIGS try to undermine the law rather than go through the process of trying to have it changed by claiming walking down the street with it is "brandishing" it, but, that's bullshit and even they know it.
So then if a group of armed Muslim men decided to protest Christianity outside a church, all this would apply to them, too, right?
 

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
So sad to see every liberal jew and atheist I chat with defend Islam while attacking Christianity. I try to make sense of it. Really I do. You know, see shit from their prospective.

For some reason, what it always breaks down to is... Liberals simply want to attack the majority, until they become the new majority.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
So sad to see every liberal jew and atheist I chat with defend Islam while attacking Christianity. I try to make sense of it. Really I do. You know, see shit from their prospective.

For some reason, what it always breaks down to is... Liberals simply want to attack the majority, until they become the new majority.
When has anyone in this thread "defended Islam"?

I was pointing out the glaring hypocrisy of the view that it's all good allowing an armed white Christian to terrorize Muslims outside a mosque, but totally terrorism if an armed brown Muslim protests Christianity outside a church...
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
That picture was taken in Irving TX

So how bout if this guy was following you around outside church?




You would piss yourself

So why does the Christian douchebag in the picture in the OP think it's OK to do the exact same thing to a Muslim outside a mosque in America?

It's literally the exact same situation except with the religions reversed
Because no one tries to stop the right wing assault rifle touting douchebag from walking around a mosque parking lot- in IRVING, TEXAS.

It's assholes like these who insist the United State continues to provide support for Israel crimes against humanity in the Palestinian 'conflict', aka slow motion displacement, depopulation and outright genocide.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
I didn't get all that from one photo.

I don't know what the laws in Texas say about open carry at a legal protest. I don't think the right to arm yourself for defense ends because you choose to conduct a formal protest. Did they have placards and march in a group chanting boorish platitudes? Did they stink like an Occupy Wallstreet sit in?

The actual intent of open carry laws are to make it known you don't have the right to be frightened or threatened by someone simply being in your presence with a firearm. Unless they are pointing it or making suggestive actions with it, people offended or scared by them are invited to fuck right off. Now, liberals and PIGS try to undermine the law rather than go through the process of trying to have it changed by claiming walking down the street with it is "brandishing" it, but, that's bullshit and even they know it.
The NRA backed gun control in response to the Black Panthers going into police stations armed and holding press conferences
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
In order:

I like Texas.

I wouldn't be anywhere near a church, for any reason.

I would be concerned, that guy has a fully automatic AK47 and is illegal to open carry, unlike the perfectly legal semi-automatic in the first post.

I haven't pissed myself in 40+ years, unlikely.

Because he is open carrying a legal firearm and not breaking any laws?

No, they're not. See above.
aren't you the same guy who complained for years and years and years about a black man outside a polling station in philadelphia who was unarmed?

now you want us to believe that it is not a concern to you when white men are toting assault rifles outside of mosques?

i guess i can believe that you are racist and bigoted like that.
 
Top