Female Noob here. Have a ? about humidity!

MTgirl

Active Member
I think Im gonna claim to be a female n00b infuture if I need a question answered...10 pages in 2 days?! Just about humidity?! Jaysus lads, bit desperate for female attention??! J/k. ;)
It may have started about humidity, but it has evolved...jeez..... Now, if I had posted a pic of me right up front...we would have already been at 20 pages :lol::lol::lol: baaa dum bump!!!
 

riddleme

Well-Known Member
Medi...I felt, for a second, I was in college again LOL. Thank God I won't be tested on any on that 411:lol:... Thanks!

On another note, I was looking at the loner today and noticed how there were a few larger dark green leaves (I think you guys call em fan leaves) that seem to be preventing the lower leaves (more light green) from getting light. I kinda moved those fan leaves underneath the flowering ones, so that the ones which are more light green, could get more light. Is that ok?

Do you ever just remove/cut off these fan leaves completely, or just keep putting them down underneath the flowering ones?
I am probably one of the most outspoken members here when it comes to removing leaves from our plants, I want to share this little ditty from


[URL="https://www.rollitup.org/"]marijuana[/URL] Botany
An Advanced Study: The Propagation and Breeding of Distinctive Cannabis
by Robert Connell Clarke




Leafing is one of the most misunderstood techniques of drug Cannabis cultivation. In the mind of the cultivator, several reasons exist for removing leaves. Many feel that large shade leaves draw energy from the flowering plant, and therefore the flowering clusters will be smaller. It is felt that by removing the leaves, surplus energy will be available, and large floral clusters will be formed. Also, some feel that inhibitors of flowering, synthesized in the leaves during the long noninductive days of summer, may be stored in the older leaves that were formed during the noninductive photoperiod. Possibly, if these inhibitor-laden leaves are removed, the plant will proceed to flower, and maturation will be accelerated. Large leaves shade the inner portions of the plant, and small atrophied floral clusters may begin to develop if they receive more light.

In actuality, few if any of the theories behind leafing give any indication of validity. Indeed, leafing possibly serves to defeat its original purpose. Large leaves have a definite function in the growth and development of Cannabis. Large leaves serve as photosynthetic factories for the production of sugars and other necessary growth sub stances. They also create shade, but at the same time they are collecting valuable solar energy and producing foods that will be used during the floral development of the plant. Premature removal of leaves may cause stunting, because the potential for photosynthesis is reduced. As these leaves age and lose their ability to carry on photo synthesis they turn chlorotie (yellow) and fall to the ground. In humid areas care is taken to remove the yellow or brown leaves, because they might invite attack by fungus. During chlorosis the plant breaks down substances, such as chlorophylls, and translocates the molecular components to a new growing part of the plant, such as the flowers. Most Cannabis plants begin to lose their larger leaves when they enter the flowering stage, and this trend continues until senescence. It is more efficient for the plant to reuse the energy and various molecular components of existing chlorophyll than to synthesize new chlorophyll at the time of flowering. During flowering this energy is needed to form floral clusters and ripen seeds.

Removing large amounts of leaves may interfere with the metabolic balance of the plant. If this metabolic change occurs too late in the season it could interfere with floral development and delay maturation. If any floral inhibitors are removed, the intended effect of accelerating flowering will probably be counteracted by metabolic upset in the plant. Removal of shade leaves does facilitate more light reaching the center of the plant, but if there is not enough food energy produced in the leaves, the small internal floral clusters will probably not grow any larger. Leaf removal may also cause sex reversal resulting from a metabolic change.

If leaves must be removed, the petiole is cut so that at least an inch remains attached to the stalk. Weaknesses in the limb axis at the node result if the leaves are pulled off at the abscission layer while they are still green. Care is taken to see that the shriveling petiole does not invite fungus attack.


whole thing available here
http://www.mellowgold.com/portugese/...nabotany2.html

I wonder if the trend of pruning leaves would change if folks knew it could cause hermies???

Enjoy
 

riddleme

Well-Known Member
Medi...I felt, for a second, I was in college again LOL. Thank God I won't be tested on any on that 411:lol:... Thanks!

On another note, I was looking at the loner today and noticed how there were a few larger dark green leaves (I think you guys call em fan leaves) that seem to be preventing the lower leaves (more light green) from getting light. I kinda moved those fan leaves underneath the flowering ones, so that the ones which are more light green, could get more light. Is that ok?

Do you ever just remove/cut off these fan leaves completely, or just keep putting them down underneath the flowering ones?
Everyday here at RIU some one ask should I trim the leaves? here lately it seems more and more members are getting it and telling the new growers NO, which is a good thing!

What would you say if I said that those shaded leaves are actually more productive for the plant?

Before I explain, let me say that we tend to call the leaves of our beloved MJ plant FAN leaves cause they are shaped like a fan. But in reality there are two types of leaves SUN leaves (the ones in the light) and SHADE leaves (the ones in the shade). Also please understand that it is the leaves that make the bud, the buds do not use light the same way that the leaves do and a plant without it's leaves will not yield big buds, period!

Getting back to my statement about leaf production, here is a quote from a texas aggie site,,,,,,,



Research done in Florida in the late 1970's revealed an interesting phenomenon. Tropical plants grown in full sun have leaves (so called sun leaves) which are structurally different from the leaves of plants grown in shade (shade leaves). Sun leaves have fewer chloroplasts and thus less chlorophyll. Their chloroplasts are located deep inside the leaves and the leaves are thick, small and large in number. Shade leaves have greater numbers of chloroplasts and thus more chlorophyll, are thin, large and few in number. When plants are grown in strong light they develop sun leaves which are photosynthetically very inefficient. If these same plants are placed in low light, they must either remake existing sun leaves or drop their sun leaves and grow a new set of shade leaves which are photosynthetically more efficient.


Now armed with these two terms we can do a simple google for the term sun leaves versus shade leaves and get a whole bunch of great info

this quote is about trees but carries very important info with regard to how the different types of leaves help the plant,,,,,



Trees need tremendous amounts of water on a daily basis. Even though it may not rain every day, a trees' roots spread through the ground absorbing water. A mature oak tree needs 40-60 gallons of water every day. Trees have ways of conserving water, because water is very precious to a tree. One way in which a tree helps to conserve water is to develop two kinds of leaves. There are sun leaves and shade leaves. Sun leaves are small, with less surface area, which reduces the amount of exposure to the sun and wind. A shade leaf is large, with greater surface area, which increases the amount of area exposed to the sun. Remember, it is important for a tree to have its leaves exposed to the sun so that photosynthesis (food making) can take place, but not so much that it loses too much water.


And from the same site a bit of explanation,,,,,,,,



Every tree or plant has a daily need for water. The cell, as the basic unit of life, is 75% water. Therefore, if a tree is to live, its cells must have enough water. A tree loses water by a process known as evapo-transpiration. Evaporation of water is increased by heat and wind. Transpiration is the movement of water from the roots through the stem to the leaves where evaporational losses can be high. The leaves must have a continuous supply of water to avoid dehydration and to carry out photosynthesis.

The effect of heat and wind on leaf water loss is greatest at the top of the tree. A tree, or any other plant, has several strategies to reduce the inevitable loss of water. There is a waxy covering (cuticle) on the leaf to reduce desiccation. Stomata (leaf openings which are necessary for gaseous exchange, but do enhance evaporation) are concentrated on the underside of the leaf so as not to be directly exposed to the sun. Stomata guard cells close when evaporation conditions are most intense.
Shade leaves and sun leaves are different. Surface area is a key consideration in reducing water loss. The less surface area that is in contact with wind or heat, the less water is lost. In other words, small is good when in direct contact with the sun. When considering the entire set of leaves on the tree, one notices that some of the leaves receive direct exposure to the sun, and other leaves receive indirect sun because of shading by other leaves. Sun leaves are found on the top part of the crown. Shade leaves are found on the bottom part of the crown especially on the north side, and have a larger surface area. Determining a ratio between shade leaves and sun leaves on a tree helps a forester or arboriculturist determine its tolerance or intolerance to shade. A tree that has a high ratio of shade leaves to sun leaves indicates it is tolerant to shade. In other words, the tree does not mind growing in the shade and is a species that is able to grow as a sapling under a dense forest canopy.


There will be a few folks that will hollor that this info is not about MJ but it relates to all plants and is based in simle botany that applies to all plants

which leads us to my favorite quote,,,,,,,,,



Abstract.Light gradients were measured and correlated with chlorophyll concentration and anatomy of leaves in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Light gradients were measured at 450, 550 and 680 nm within thin (455 μm) and thick (630 μm) leaves of spinach grown under sun and shade conditions. The light gradients were relatively steep in both types of leaves and 90% of the light at 450 and 680 nm was absorbed by the initial 140 μm of the palisade. In general, blue light was depleted faster than red light which, in turn was depleted faster than green light. Light penetrated further into the thicker palisade of sun leaves in comparison to the shade leaves. The distance that blue light at 450 nm travelled before it became 90% depleted was 120 μm in sun leaves versus 76 μm in shade leaves. Red light at 680 nm and green light at 550 nm travelled further but the trends were similar to that measured at 450nm. The steeper light gradients within the palisade-of shade leaves were caused by increased scattering of light within the intercellular air spaces and/or cells which were less compact than those in sun leaves. The decline in the amount of light within the leaf appeared to be balanced by a gradient in chlorophyll concentration measured in paradermal sections. Progressing from the adaxial epidermis, chlorophyll content increased through the palisade and then declined through the spongy mesophyll. Chlorophyll content was similar in the palisade of both sun and shade leaves. Chloroplast distribution within both sun and shade leaves was relatively uniform so that the chlorophyll gradient appeared to be caused by greater amounts of chlorophyll within chloroplasts located deeper within the leaf. These results indicate that the anatomy of the palisade may be of special importance for controlling the penetration of photo-synthetically active radiation into the leaf. Changing the structural characteristics of individual palisade cells or their arrangement may be an adaptation that maximizes the absorption of light in leaves with varying mesophyll thickness due to different ambient light regimes.


Seems like every day I tell some one that plants do not see/react to light the same way we do, I hope that I have better explained for everyone now. Why it is so important to give your plants the proper spectrum of light as opposed to tons of lumens
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
It may have started about humidity, but it has evolved...jeez..... Now, if I had posted a pic of me right up front...we would have already been at 20 pages :lol::lol::lol: baaa dum bump!!!
I was only joking by the way, just thought it was funny that I read one thread about a new guy "complaining" he wasnt getting any help on his thread and then flicked to this one and it was 10 (now 11) pages in 2 days. Anyways welcome to Rollitup.org! :)
 

MTgirl

Active Member
Lol I am also a female newb, think i might add that part to my gow journal its lacking in views. you go Girl!
It worked for me, it SHALL work for you! After all, like I said earlier on this thread, "there ARE a lot of sausages on here" ;-)

I gotta give it to a lot of these guys...they have much more experience with growing weed than I do! Now, I can grow an 11" zucchini in a container...but actually posting a pic of it...I don't think I should go 'there'........LOL
 

MTgirl

Active Member
Hi there Riddle. Ok...I understand...had to read it twice, but I think I've got it. Translation, in lamen's terms: 1. DO NOT cut the shade leaves off, as they serve a 'higher purpose' in the scheme of things. 2. Don't fkn mess with the "natural" way in which the plant is growing. The shade leaves serve a purpose in relation to 'shielding' the lower leaves from excess heat, evaporation, radiation etc.

I am going to go move the leaves back to their original position and leave it the fck alone.
 

MTgirl

Active Member
I was only joking by the way, just thought it was funny that I read one thread about a new guy "complaining" he wasnt getting any help on his thread and then flicked to this one and it was 10 (now 11) pages in 2 days. Anyways welcome to Rollitup.org! :)
BTW I knew u were jk....:lol: Thanks...VERY glad to have found this site!!!
 

Bonzing

Active Member
Hi there Riddle. Ok...I understand...had to read it twice, but I think I've got it. Translation, in lamen's terms: 1. DO NOT cut the shade leaves off, as they serve a 'higher purpose' in the scheme of things. 2. Don't fkn mess with the "natural" way in which the plant is growing. The shade leaves serve a purpose in relation to 'shielding' the lower leaves from excess heat, evaporation, radiation etc.

I am going to go move the leaves back to their original position and leave it the fck alone.

hey hun , RiddleMe is just the best .. <--- go check all his threads then you wont have 1 question left to ask ..
 

MTgirl

Active Member
hey hun , RiddleMe is just the best .. <--- go check all his threads then you wont have 1 question left to ask ..
Yah....he has given me loads of good info! So has Medi1...and frmrboi too! A lot of thanks to RIU for creating this site...
 

Budluvin

Member
I can understand how you would be. ITs bollocks. it reminds me of when they increased the legal age for buying tobacco from 16 to 18. So everyone who was addicted already who were under 18 could no longer get there own.

pah, even if they wanted to stop it, am sure it would still happen.

Green away! :twisted:
 

MTgirl

Active Member
Yup, just like I heard someone comment in an article, "It's like trying to put the toothpaste back into the tube" What ticks me off the most is that we are supposed to be a free country...yeah right. I love the States and all and love living here. But, the govt. trying to dictate to me how I choose to medicate myself is against what I consider to be freedom. I have Crohn's disease. I am not someone who sits on the couch and gets high every day (nothing against those who do, of course LOL). When I get sick to the point of physical exhaustion from throwing up stomach bile, instead of going to the hospital for 4+ hours and getting an IV stuck into my arm to rehydrate me, get a shot that burns horribly which stops my stomach from producing acid, and in the end, my insurance company spending $1,000 for all of this??!! Now, if I could just smoke some weed and not have to go through all of that...what would any other so called "free" person rather do?

I hate to wish any harm on anyone, but just let one of those proponents of repealing the bill get Crohn's or Cancer etc. and see what it is like to be us.
 
Top