Hee, hee, hee, for sure I'm the master of nothing, and not even well versed on the subject of hash, beyond minor personal experimentation starting in the 60's and reading Robert Clarke, et al, but I think we are not in disagreement, as much as saying two different things.
Regardless of tradition and what works best in the hands of the gifted master, I'm saying that if you continue to press kif in the palm of your hand, with your thumb, it will turn to putty, with no more than body or compressive heat.
The definition that you posted, didn't make that clear, nor did clearly state that if external heat was not applied, the product was not hashish, so I see it as ambiguous, as opposed to erroneous.
Heat may make it a faster process, and any number of other nuances apply to make it primo, but my statement was focused specifically on "required" vis a vis "good practice."
In context, the original question was, "After making bubble hash can you turn into a real form of hash with heat and compression?" Your point is well taken that you can't make traditional Hashish from bubble, which was what I was alluding to with my "define hashish" comment, and on which we agree.
Are you saying that you can't make putty out of kif just by kneading it in the palm of your hand with your thumb, or that I can't make a hash puck using a hydraulic press and die with no heat, or simply that the product would not be traditional hashish?