Ever think about growing? Here's why you SHOULD

see4 said:

Spam Advertising is a sure fire way to get banned. You are a quack. Your links are to bullshit anecdotal findings.

When you post a reference from the New England Journal of Medicine, or Harvard Review, I may start listening, until then, all you have done is provided this forum with useless spam advertising.

In the end. What is your point?

Click to expand...

Arcturon said:

Read the sources of at least 8 of the Clinical Studies and Case Reviews.
You will see reputable research organizations.

Read the studies. they perform tests based on direct evidence.
That is not anecdotal evidence.

Also, I got a message from potpimp, a moderator, that states that the information I have provided is from valid and reputable sources, and that posting the information is the right thing to do.

I am not advertising anything, as the studies provided are archived for reference and research purposes.

GTFO my thread, agent of disinformation.

Click to expand...

Claypipe said:

^^^^^^^^^^

Click to expand...

minnesmoker said:

Being a moderator makes your guardian angel no more accurate than you. Your studies are shit, your references are worse. You don't understand what linking to research proving your point means. I don't give a shit about how it affects a rat's asshole when applied as a salve. You are the spreader of misinformation. You are pushing soft science, and YOU are giving advice that could lead to people's death or an increase in negative affects caused by illness.

Your magical "hash oil" isn't magical. And, it's not what is discussed in most of the "studies" you've posted. Again, references to references to an abstract is not supporting your argument.

Like this:

THC may be psychologically addictive and causes increased presentation of mental disorders.*
Citation: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1124674/

Marijuana use by vulnerable youth increases odds of onset of depression:*
Citation: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC135489/

Marijuana extract (CBD) linked to reduction in lung cancer cell growth, and significantly reduced tumor mass in mice.
Citation: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22198381


These citations can all be followed, they give an abstract, the methods used, and the results. They are on topic, and are not from a pot forum, or youtube videos, but are published, pee-reviewed studies which have been found reliable enough to make it into the National Library of Medicine. Not a "research institute" with no accreditation, not a pro-marijuana board or website.

You claimed 100% cancer cure rate, from Hash oil. Now, prove it. Post UNBIASED PROOF of that, or YOU are the spreader of misinformation, and a propagandist of the worst kind, one which exploits the sick, the ill, the mentally deficient. You are no different than the voodoo surgeons of Mexico and the Bahamas that promise magical cures, but leave you for dead, instead.

I don't give a shit if you have studies showing that weed makes your dick glow purple in a good way, and increases I.Q. by 200%. Those weren't your initial claims, 100% cure was your claim.


*First two studies I could grab, there are a lot more. I'm just trying you how to cite a valid source.

Click to expand...

Arcturon said:

Obviously you didn't read any of the studies I posted.

A grip of them are from pubmed, where you got yours. Crawl back under your rock, troll.

Click to expand...

minnesmoker said:

Troll? I know how to spell and punctuate. You quoted me, now please read what you quoted. You have NOT posted that study showing hash oil cures cancer, in as little as 15 days.

See how I made a point, and then posted an ON TOPIC and RELEVANT study, as a citation, to prove the point? That's a citation.

Throwing 100 different "studies" up, and not a single one of them showing definitively that cancer is CURED 100% of the time, in as little as 15 days, is not proofing your argument. It's being another layman, armed with not quite enough knowledge trying to share their new-found "knowledge," but overstating it, in their enthusiasm.

I take medicinal cannabis, my dosage was set up by my original doctor, after consulting my neurologist and therapist. I take a consistent dosage, daily (the scale comes out, every time.) I'm a very bad person without my medication. I researched, I went out to HMS and looked at the labs, read the papers on cancer, and psychotic disorders caused by consumption of Cannabis. Since mine's a traumatic brain injury coupled with a genetic personality disorder, it's safe for me to take cannabis for my extensive body and brain damage. I'm pro-cannabis, hence my signing onto this board, and I'm pro-medical cannabis, hence my using it. I'm against crazy blanket statements that people with diminished capacity may read and act on. Such as my previous example of a mentally diminished psychotic with diabetic stopping anti-psychotics and insulin because "hash oil cures everything."

I'll apologize, if you feel I got a bit on the offense there, I'm really big on facts being facts, after proof. I'm also big on proper research, as it'll be the path that leads to legalization.

Click to expand...

minnesmoker said:

Troll? I know how to spell and punctuate. You quoted me, now please read what you quoted. You have NOT posted that study showing hash oil cures cancer, in as little as 15 days.

See how I made a point, and then posted an ON TOPIC and RELEVANT study, as a citation, to prove the point? That's a citation.

Throwing 100 different "studies" up, and not a single one of them showing definitively that cancer is CURED 100% of the time, in as little as 15 days, is not proofing your argument. It's being another layman, armed with not quite enough knowledge trying to share their new-found "knowledge," but overstating it, in their enthusiasm.

I take medicinal cannabis, my dosage was set up by my original doctor, after consulting my neurologist and therapist. I take a consistent dosage, daily (the scale comes out, every time.) I'm a very bad person without my medication. I researched, I went out to HMS and looked at the labs, read the papers on cancer, and psychotic disorders caused by consumption of Cannabis. Since mine's a traumatic brain injury coupled with a genetic personality disorder, it's safe for me to take cannabis for my extensive body and brain damage. I'm pro-cannabis, hence my signing onto this board, and I'm pro-medical cannabis, hence my using it. I'm against crazy blanket statements that people with diminished capacity may read and act on. Such as my previous example of a mentally diminished psychotic with diabetic stopping anti-psychotics and insulin because "hash oil cures everything."

I'll apologize, if you feel I got a bit on the offense there, I'm really big on facts being facts, after proof. I'm also big on proper research, as it'll be the path that leads to legalization.

Click to expand...

Cannabinoids and Neuroprotection in Global and Focal Cerebral Ischemia and in Neuronal Cultures -- Nagayama et al. 19 (: 2987 -- Journal of Neuroscience

Arcturon said:

Obviously you didn't read any of the studies I posted.
by the way, I said all cancers, not all patients.
A grip of them are from pubmed, where you got yours. Crawl back under your rock, troll.

Click to expand...

Arcturon said:

As I said, it cures all cancers, not all patients. If it cures all cancers, that does not mean it cures every patient.

Click to expand...

see4 said:

Stop running in circles. I get it, you have a bunch of links you can show us. Please point out exactly in one of those articles where it states Hash Oil cures cancer, and does it in 15 days. Lets concentrate ONLY on this point right now, once you prove this, we can move on to others. Until that, all that you say is debunked.

Click to expand...

Arcturon said:

That is the most ridiculous thing you've said all day. Nothing I have said can be debunked without proper research.

The cannabinoids present in the hash oil are used to cure the cancers.

The lab extractions of cannabinoids in some of these experiments was identical to the extraction process used for the hemp oil. Same extraction process + same variables = same experiment. In both, the results are the same, because the variables are the same. and the process is the same.

Click to expand...

see4 said:

No. If patient A has cancer, and patient B has cancer, what you are saying is that if patient A takes Hash Oil, they will be cured, and if patient B takes some other drug, they may or may not be cured.

Do not back peddle on your initial statement. That is what you are currently trying to do.

Click to expand...

Arcturon said:

What I'm saying is, if patient A takes hash oil, and a year left, they are much more likely to continue living, cured of the cancer. Now if patient B only has 3 or 4 weeks left, he will have a much lower chance of being cured in that short amount of time. No back peddling.

Click to expand...

see4 said:

That is what you are saying right now. But your original fact is still unfounded. You said, Hash Oil cures cancer. Period. That is not what you are saying now.

Click to expand...

see4 said:

That is what you are saying right now. But your original statement is still unfounded. You said, Hash Oil cures cancer. Period. That is not what you are saying now.

Click to expand...

Arcturon said:

Even if patient B's cancer is cured, his survival rate is much lower.

Click to expand...

see4 said:

No. If patient B's cancer is cured, his survival rate from cancer is 100%. That is the definition of cure.

Click to expand...