If I could justify the expense to myself id be interested in learning to do a closed loop extraction kind of thing, solvents aside. I really wish the CO2 tech was up to par, everything I seem is usually gooey and parallels a classic bubble bag hash in potency at around %70 THC, but with many less contaminates. Usually tastes pretty funky too, even if could bring myself to go out and just drop the G's tomorrow don't know if id go that route... yet...
Define up to par. I've personally extracted, as well as sampled the funky CO2 lawn clipping tasting SCFE CO2 concentrates as well, but am starting to run into samples by others that fly in the face of that past standard.
They were extracted and then fractionated off on decompression, so as to separate the monoterpenes from the cannabinoids and both from the longer chain molecules.
The longer chain molecules were discarded and enough of the original monoterpenes added back, so as to provide flavor and taste to the high 90's percentile cannabinoids fraction. It makes a concentrate that in a blindfold test, would get top marks, but isn't as purdy to gaze upon as BHO.
It doesn't look like a piece of stained glass, like a pristine BHO statter, or have the curb appeal of the best BHO/Propane waxes, but the aroma and flavor are excellent and the effects are outstanding.
The bigger issue, is the cost of the equipment to do that, as well as the cost to operate and maintain, in conjunction with how long it takes, as compared to quality BHO extractions.
BHO/Propane systems simply have the capacity to produce greater volumes of prettier product, with excellent aroma and taste, and good to excellent effects, using low toxicity solvents, with a cheaper equipment investment, and that have residual solvent levels below levels of concern for those simple saturated Alkane solvents.
Said another way, it is a more cost effective extraction method, that currently better meets market whims and demands.
You can further fractionally distill BHO to achieve similar effects to the fractionated CO2, but that adds to the cost of the BHO, at which point the costs are probably closer together.