conservatives concerned that Lindsay Graham is gay

Is Lindsey Graham a compromised homosexual
Lindsey Graham is accused of being a closeted homosexual by both the right and the left. However, the real question is whether or not his homosexuality is being used to blackmail him.
Washington DC insiders believe that Larry Flint spent $1 million to obtain compromising photographs of Lindsey Graham and think those pictures are being used to blackmail him.
Lindsey Graham made a name for himself by attacking Bill Clinton. His reputation for being hard on Clinton propelled him from the House to the Senate. Yet once in the Senate he became a big government leftist and champion of open borders.
Larry Flint had offered a one million dollar reward for compromising photographs of any of the politicians involved in having Bill Clinton impeached for the Monica Lewinsky scandal. In 2010, Flint announced he had evidence that a prominent Republican Senator was secretly homosexual. DC insiders immediately assumed it was Graham.
Flint promised to out the Senator in two months if he didn’t come out of the closet on his own. Flint reneged on this promise.
Others have pledged to provide evidence that Lindsey Graham is homosexual as well, but always renege
http://topconservativenews.com/2014/03/is-lindsey-graham-a-compromised-homosexual/

or he could be metro..

Hey, if it gets him out of office, let's help spread the rumor.

Maybe he could go to work for Apple and be Tim Cook's butt-boy?

Democrats are all gay.

Republicans are all repressed super-gays.

White people are gay.

Black people are gay.

Brown people are gay.

Asian people are gay.

<Insert other colour here> are gay.

Gay people are gay.

Straight people are gay.

EVERYONE IS FUCKING GAY!!!!

Now...can we all stop obsessing about where consenting adults put their dicks/beavers?

Seriously, if they're not fucking your asshole, why does anyone even care?

"Now...can we all stop obsessing about where consenting adults put their dicks/beavers?

Seriously, if they're not fucking your asshole, why does anyone even care?"

Just as soon as there is no more benefit in using this as a culture war issue to separate the fools from their votes, this will no longer be an issue. And no sooner.

Lindsay Lohan is going to hell to be anally fucked by the infamous musselman homosexual, Barack Hussein Obama! That about covers it.

Harrekin said:

Democrats are all gay.

Republicans are all repressed super-gays.

White people are gay.

Black people are gay.

Brown people are gay.

Asian people are gay.

<Insert other colour here> are gay.

Gay people are gay.

Straight people are gay.

EVERYONE IS FUCKING GAY!!!!

Now...can we all stop obsessing about where consenting adults put their dicks/beavers?

Seriously, if they're not fucking your asshole, why does anyone even care?

Click to expand...

The problem comes in when you vote against something that you yourself are in the closet about. No problem being gay, but don't then go vote for a ban on gay marriage.

desert dude said:

Just as soon as there is no more benefit in using this as a culture war issue to separate the fools from their votes, this will no longer be an issue. And no sooner.

Click to expand...

tell that to your hero and savior rend pawl who is desperately hoping that states see the error of their ways and start re-illegalizing marriage equality.

UncleBuck said:

tell that to your hero and savior rend pawl who is desperately hoping that states see the error of their ways and start re-illegalizing marriage equality.

Click to expand...

Source?

Harrekin said:

Source?

Click to expand...

are you playing dumb or are you really this dumb?

do you really need me to cite rend pawl's views favoring and absolutely hoping for state to re-illegalize marriage equality?

that bigotry can win back over the hearts and minds of people?

are you really this fucking stupid?

UncleBuck said:

are you playing dumb or are you really this dumb?

do you really need me to cite rend pawl's views favoring and absolutely hoping for state to re-illegalize marriage equality?

that bigotry can win back over the hearts and minds of people?

are you really this fucking stupid?

Click to expand...

You made the claim, back it up.

I think Rand Paul is a loser, he's just slightly less of a loser than most so if you cite a primary source then I'll concede the point.

Harrekin said:

You made the claim, back it up.

I think Rand Paul is a loser, he's just slightly less of a loser than most so if you cite a primary source then I'll concede the point.

Click to expand...

ok, you're ignorant then. does not surprise me.

http://reason.com/blog/2013/05/13/rand-paul-assures-evangelicals-that-he-d

“If we’re to say each state can decide, I think a good 25 or 30 states still do believe in traditional marriage, and maybe we allow that debate to go on for another couple of decades and see if we can still win back the hearts and minds of people,” he said.

"Win back the hearts and minds of people"? What does that even mean? That if we give the country enough time, a majority of voters will change their minds about extending equal protection to same-sex couples, and revoke it? And that would be a good thing?

UncleBuck said:

ok, you're ignorant then. does not surprise me.

http://reason.com/blog/2013/05/13/rand-paul-assures-evangelicals-that-he-d

“If we’re to say each state can decide, I think a good 25 or 30 states still do believe in traditional marriage, and maybe we allow that debate to go on for another couple of decades and see if we can still win back the hearts and minds of people,” he said.

"Win back the hearts and minds of people"? What does that even mean? That if we give the country enough time, a majority of voters will change their minds about extending equal protection to same-sex couples, and revoke it? And that would be a good thing?

Click to expand...

He advocates for each state to determine their own laws related to marriage and encourages people to try influence it using their own personal opinions.

Isn't that what a representative democracy is about?

So still waiting for a source that says he wants it changed back.

Id actually advocate for the Govt not to restrict any 2 consenting adults from marriage.

Harrekin said:

He advocates for each state to determine their own laws related to marriage and encourages people to try influence it using their own personal opinions.

Isn't that what a representative democracy is about?

Click to expand...

we live in a constitutional republic. that means you don't get to vote on other people's rights.

Harrekin said:

So still waiting for a source that says he wants it changed back.

Click to expand...

"maybe we allow that debate to go on for another couple of decades and see if we can still win back the hearts and minds of people"

UncleBuck said:

we live in a constitutional republic. that means you don't get to vote on other people's rights.




"maybe we allow that debate to go on for another couple of decades and see if we can still win back the hearts and minds of people"

Click to expand...

So you encourage ending all debate that doesn't fall in line with your viewpoint?

Wanna talk about this thing called facism?

Harrekin said:

You made the claim, back it up.

I think Rand Paul is a loser, he's just slightly less of a loser than most so if you cite a primary source then I'll concede the point.

Click to expand...

Same-sex marriage[edit]
Paul personally opposes same-sex marriage, but he believes the issue should be left to the states to decide.[40][41] He has said he thought that the Supreme Court's ruling in Windsor v. United States, which struck down the portion of the Defense of Marriage Act that defined marriage at a federal level (as between a man and a woman), was appropriate.[42]
In April 2013, in an interview with the National Review, he said, "I’m an old-fashioned traditionalist. I believe in the historic and religious definition of marriage,” and “That being said, I’m not for eliminating contracts between adults. I think there are ways to make the tax code more neutral, so it doesn’t mention marriage. Then we don’t have to redefine what marriage is; we just don’t have marriage in the tax code.”[43]

Harrekin said:

So you encourage ending all debate that doesn't fall in line with your viewpoint?

Wanna talk about this thing called facism?

Click to expand...

you can debate it all you want, but you can't let people decide to take away fundamental rights because they feel like they should.

that's probably closer to fascism than granting equal protection of the law and civil rights.

ChesusRice said:

Same-sex marriage[edit]
Paul personally opposes same-sex marriage, but he believes the issue should be left to the states to decide.[40][41] He has said he thought that the Supreme Court's ruling in Windsor v. United States, which struck down the portion of the Defense of Marriage Act that defined marriage at a federal level (as between a man and a woman), was appropriate.[42]
In April 2013, in an interview with the National Review, he said, "I’m an old-fashioned traditionalist. I believe in the historic and religious definition of marriage,” and “That being said, I’m not for eliminating contracts between adults. I think there are ways to make the tax code more neutral, so it doesn’t mention marriage. Then we don’t have to redefine what marriage is; we just don’t have marriage in the tax code.”[43]

Click to expand...

So he's personally opposed but wouldn't legislate on it, he'd leave it to the States.

Seems pretty consistent to me.

EDIT: He's still a dip-shit, but at least not a hypocritical one.

Harrekin said:

So he's personally opposed but wouldn't legislate on it, he'd leave it to the States.

Seems pretty consistent to me.

Click to expand...

rend pawl hopes to change "hearts and minds" to squash civil rights and equal protection of the law.

seems like a fucking bigot to me, no wonder you love him so much.

Libtards gotta smear.