Come watch crybabies cry about gay rights!

OddBall1st · May 31, 2015

Padawanbater2 said:
No it's not. There is nothing wrong with gay people or the sex they have, and the fact that the majority of Americans agree with that is what upsets you

Because two consenting adults share feelings, they get to share government incentives, yep

You wouldn't know the definition of marriage if it bit your bigoted self in the ass

Marriage was defined by ancient tribal leaders, even in biblical teachings, for millennia before your bigoted ass came along. Why are you trying to redefine marriage as one man one woman? Why are you trying to break biblical tradition that we've had for thousands of years?

But in the Government incentive, it is clearly defined as a man and woman. Gays feel left out and want in,...and to change the incentive to include them. Sorry, I got a problem with that.

Padawanbater2 · May 31, 2015

OddBall1st said:
But in the Government incentive, it is clearly defined as a man and woman. Gays feel left out and want in,...and to change the incentive to include them. Sorry, I got a problem with that.

"But in the Government incentive, it is clearly defined as a white man and a white woman. Blacks feel left out and want in,...and to change the incentive to include them. Sorry, I got a problem with that."

OddBall1st · May 31, 2015

Padawanbater2 said:
No it's not. There is nothing wrong with gay people or the sex they have, and the fact that the majority of Americans agree with that is what upsets you

Because two consenting adults share feelings, they get to share government incentives, yep

You wouldn't know the definition of marriage if it bit your bigoted self in the ass

Marriage was defined by ancient tribal leaders, even in biblical teachings, for millennia before your bigoted ass came along. Why are you trying to redefine marriage as one man one woman? Why are you trying to break biblical tradition that we've had for thousands of years?

I can find just as many people who agree with you as disagree with you,...so there is merit.

Second sentence, our difference. I don`t have to share your opinion.

As to your last paragraph, What did they conclude? Why does that matter with the Federal Marriage incentive ?

OddBall1st · May 31, 2015

Padawanbater2 said:
"But in the Government incentive, it is clearly defined as a white man and a white woman. Blacks feel left out and want in,...and to change the incentive to include them. Sorry, I got a problem with that."

No it is not. It is written Man and Woman. There is no mention of skin color because it has no relative significance. Until you came along.

Padawanbater2 · May 31, 2015

OddBall1st said:
I can find just as many people who agree with you as disagree with you,...so there is merit.

Second sentence, our difference. I don`t have to share your opinion.

As to your last paragraph, What did they conclude? Why does that matter with the Federal Marriage incentive ?

No you can't. People who oppose federally recognized gay marriage are a small minority in America, something in the 20% range, people who support it is pushing the 70% range

You're bitching about changing the "traditional definition of marriage" while trying to change the actual traditional definition of marriage... Irony at its best

Padawanbater2 · May 31, 2015

OddBall1st said:
No it is not. It is written Man and Woman. There is no mention of skin color because it has no relative significance. Until you came along.

Quote where it says "one man and one woman" in any federally recognized document

OddBall1st · May 31, 2015

Padawanbater2 said:
No you can't. People who oppose federally recognized gay marriage are a small minority in America, something in the 20% range, people who support it is pushing the 70% range

You're bitching about changing the "traditional definition of marriage" while trying to change the actual traditional definition of marriage... Irony at its best

Again, the traditional definition, (you have yet to describe) has no barring on the United States definition when it comes to Federal incentives.

Padawanbater2 · May 31, 2015

OddBall1st said:
Again, the traditional definition, (you have yet to describe) has no barring on the United States definition when it comes to Federal incentives.

If it has no bearing, then why are you complaining about me "trying to change the traditional definition of marriage" while you're trying to change the actual traditional definition of marriage as outlined by the motherfucking bible, bitch?

OddBall1st · May 31, 2015

Padawanbater2 said:
If it has no bearing, then why are you complaining about me "trying to change the traditional definition of marriage" while you're trying to change the actual traditional definition of marriage as outlined by the motherfucking bible, bitch?

Because you are trying to impose that traditional marriage definition that you still have not stated upon me. The text is written for me, not them, but now,...it has to change,...maybe, cry louder or something....say you`re equal some more, they are listening.

When you get your way, should they write another, will you cry again ?

Padawanbater2 · May 31, 2015

OddBall1st said:
Because you are trying to impose that traditional marriage definition that you still have not stated upon me. The text is written for me, not them, but now,...it has to change,...maybe, cry louder or something....say you`re equal some more, they are listening.

When you get your way, should they write another, will you cry again ?

Jiberish. Learn English, the American language!

Your opposition makes the supreme court decision that much more juicy! I love that fucks like you hate it! I hope you feel it, deep down, philosophically!

The world is telling you to go fuck yourself

UncleBuck · May 31, 2015

OddBall1st said:
I did chose my wife.

but you could have just as easily chosen a dude?

OddBall1st · May 31, 2015

UncleBuck said:
but you could have just as easily chosen a dude?

Butt didn`t. Wouldn`t have kids to love and support. You know, somebody gotta like women or all man becomes extinct.

It`s either stay with nature or become test tube parentless sheep. I don`t want your mom named Pyrex....

UncleBuck · May 31, 2015

OddBall1st said:
Butt didn`t.

so you were ambivalent about whether to have sex with men or women for the rest of your life?

OddBall1st · May 31, 2015

UncleBuck said:
so you were ambivalent about whether to have sex with men or women for the rest of your life?

Nope.

OddBall1st · May 31, 2015

Buck, please don`t say your wife chose you,....I can`t imagine why.....

UncleBuck · May 31, 2015

OddBall1st said:
Nope.

so you preferred homosexual relations but decided to live a lie and marry a woman?

OddBall1st · May 31, 2015

Padawanbater2 said:
Jiberish. Learn English, the American language!

Your opposition makes the supreme court decision that much more juicy! I love that fucks like you hate it! I hope you feel it, deep down, philosophically!

The world is telling you to go fuck yourself

Sooo, about that traditional biblical definition ??

OddBall1st · May 31, 2015

UncleBuck said:
so you preferred homosexual relations but decided to live a lie and marry a woman?

Nope.

UncleBuck · May 31, 2015

OddBall1st said:
Sooo, about that traditional biblical definition ??

like abraham, jacob, david, and solomon, who all had multiple wives?

UncleBuck · May 31, 2015

OddBall1st said:
Nope.

so you were attracted to having sex with little boys, but decided to live a lie and marry your wife instead?

Come watch crybabies cry about gay rights!

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member