Clown Show

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Oh lord...let me guess, they didn't give you your boiled egg this morning

Good morning London. I don't need anyone to give me a boiled egg. I have my chickens trained to provide me with plenty of eggs. They are obedient little slaves.

I tell them if they don't like living in the chicken coop I built for them, they should try living on the farmstead next door. Those chickens have it far worse etc.

Do you see any parallels between that and how you have been trained ? Now go lay some eggs for your master.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Then why havent you admitted that you posted a lie? I mean the Hillary quote, not the white power group.
I didn't know it was a lie, much like how you view government in general.

If it was inaccurate and you can prove it, I'm happy to retract it, I'm more interested in being accurate than defending a lie.
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
I didn't know it was a lie, much like how you view government in general.

If it was inaccurate and you can prove it, I'm happy to retract it, I'm more interested in being accurate than defending a lie.
Yeah we are going to get into that game again huh? The burden of proof rests on me to prove she didn't say it?



This is why nobody listens to a word you say. You are without a moral compass.

Do your fucking due diligence you utter piece of crap.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Yeah we are going to get into that game again huh? The burden of proof rests on me to prove she didn't say it?



This is why nobody listens to a word you say. You are without a moral compass.

Do your fucking due diligence you utter piece of crap.

That wasn't very nice. My core philosophy springs from the idea that human interactions should arise from voluntary, peaceful and consensual means.

Could you tell me if your moral compass points there or what anchors your core philosophy ?

Before I accuse you of anything, I'll take your advice, so consider the question as an act of due diligence on my part.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
That wasn't very nice. My core philosophy springs from the idea that human interactions should arise from voluntary, peaceful and consensual means.

Could you tell me if your moral compass points there or what anchors your core philosophy ?

Before I accuse you of anything, I'll take your advice, so consider the question as an act of due diligence on my part.
Dont open an establishment to the public if you don't want to serve the publIc.

It's that simple.
 

Drowning-Man

Well-Known Member
In san Antonio Texas every business has a sign that state " we have the right to refuse service to anyone" so wierd, never seen a city like that saw more of those signs in one day than I did in my entire life
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
In san Antonio Texas every business has a sign that state " we have the right to refuse service to anyone" so wierd, never seen a city like that saw more of those signs in one day than I did in my entire life
If they're being abusive to staff, the property or other clients its a different story.

Otherwise the only color you should be thinking about is "green".
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Good morning London. I don't need anyone to give me a boiled egg. I have my chickens trained to provide me with plenty of eggs. They are obedient little slaves.

I tell them if they don't like living in the chicken coop I built for them, they should try living on the farmstead next door. Those chickens have it far worse etc.

Do you see any parallels between that and how you have been trained ? Now go lay some eggs for your master.
I went and had a great early lunch with my wife at the hospital, then I went and held newborn babies for an hour. I'm going to drop off some items at the public elementary school Friday and then attend a football game later that evening. I'm thinking of taking the family out to dinner on Sunday, if no one has other plans.
I'm so glad no one can just kick me out of any of these places due to the color of my skin. Why do you support such

ps. those nurses at the institution are trained to take care of you. Stop calling them chickens or slaves.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Dont open an establishment to the public if you don't want to serve the publIc.

It's that simple.
Obviously if a person or group of people own a property it's private property isn't it?

Obviously if a person wants to exclude somebody, then it's not open to (all of ) the public is it ?

Well, not by the choice of the property owner anyway. So how come out of one side of your pea brain you can believe that a thing such as private property can be owned, but then at the same time also be administered by a nonowner via a forcible edict....isn't that a contradiction ?

Your post above is a bit of a platitude, but doesn't address the contradictions I've brought up. I don't think you are capable of addressing them...it's that simple.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
In san Antonio Texas every business has a sign that state " we have the right to refuse service to anyone" so wierd, never seen a city like that saw more of those signs in one day than I did in my entire life

Who has a right to force another person to serve them or to interact with them ?

Do you ? Do I ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I went and had a great early lunch with my wife at the hospital, then I went and held newborn babies for an hour. I'm going to drop off some items at the public elementary school Friday and then attend a football game later that evening. I'm thinking of taking the family out to dinner on Sunday, if no one has other plans.
I'm so glad no one can just kick me out of any of these places due to the color of my skin. Why do you support such

ps. those nurses at the institution are trained to take care of you. Stop calling them chickens or slaves.

You are constantly claiming something about me which is in error.

I can support a persons right not to interact with another person or support their right to refuse to interact with somebody on an involuntary basis, while still thinking their reason(s) for refusing to interact isn't one I'd personally approve of.

For instance, I don't agree with people who overeat to the point of obesity, but I don't think I have a right to rip a cheeseburger out of their mouth or go to their property and steal their donuts or go to their property and force them to engage in trade with me.

That would be me forcing a human interaction on them, and none of us have any right to do that, yet we all have a right to defend our own body and justly acquired property wouldn't you agree?

The fact that you think you have a right to force somebody to interact with you, to use their body to serve you, people who would prefer not to, means you are willing to initiate force, to a person who isn't initiating force on you.

Do I think not associating with somebody due to their race is silly? Yes
Do I think a person who forces another person to interact with them is doing it wrong ? Yes
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
you are forcing yourself on us right now.
How did you get day-room privileges this time of day. Have you taken your afternoon meds ?
No, but as soon as I find my lighter that will get taken care of.

Enjoy the football game.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
No I agree I just thought it was curius that every business in town had that sign. Usually only see it in bad parts of town in other city's.

The way to end racism is for people to see others as individuals and not hold people responsible for the actions of somebody who isn't them, but shares their race.

I would not patronize a racists place of business, which is the only choice I should have. I don't have the right to make anyone associate with me or control another persons property. If a racist doesn't want my business, someone else will get it.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
You are constantly claiming something about me which is in error.

I can support a persons right not to interact with another person or support their right to refuse to interact with somebody on an involuntary basis, while still thinking their reason(s) for refusing to interact isn't one I'd personally approve of.

For instance, I don't agree with people who overeat to the point of obesity, but I don't think I have a right to rip a cheeseburger out of their mouth or go to their property and steal their donuts or go to their property and force them to engage in trade with me.

That would be me forcing a human interaction on them, and none of us have any right to do that, yet we all have a right to defend our own body and justly acquired property wouldn't you agree?

The fact that you think you have a right to force somebody to interact with you, to use their body to serve you, people who would prefer not to, means you are willing to initiate force, to a person who isn't initiating force on you.

Do I think not associating with somebody due to their race is silly? Yes
Do I think a person who forces another person to interact with them is doing it wrong ? Yes
You are constantly claiming something about me which is in error.

I can support a persons right not to interact with another person or support their right to refuse to interact with somebody on an involuntary basis, while still thinking their reason(s) for refusing to interact isn't one I'd personally approve of.

For instance, I don't agree with people who overeat to the point of obesity, but I don't think I have a right to rip a cheeseburger out of their mouth or go to their property and steal their donuts or go to their property and force them to engage in trade with me.

That would be me forcing a human interaction on them, and none of us have any right to do that, yet we all have a right to defend our own body and justly acquired property wouldn't you agree?

The fact that you think you have a right to force somebody to interact with you, to use their body to serve you, people who would prefer not to, means you are willing to initiate force, to a person who isn't initiating force on you.

Do I think not associating with somebody due to their race is silly? Yes
Do I think a person who forces another person to interact with them is doing it wrong ? Yes
No one is forcing anyone to open a public business. That is a choice one makes.
Why would you support a racist bigot ? Why do you not support civil rights ?
What if your son was in a bad car accident ( never would want this ) and he was taken to a hospital where he was told the doctor on ER call does not treat gays. Would you still say people should not be force to act at services open to the public.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
No one is forcing anyone to open a public business. That is a choice one makes.
Why would you support a racist bigot ? Why do you not support civil rights ?
What if your son was in a bad car accident ( never would want this ) and he was taken to a hospital where he was told the doctor on ER call does not treat gays. Would you still say people should not be force to act at services open to the public.
He needs to open a private club, then he can legally pick and choose members based on whatever retraded creed he wants.

Look it up, its a crazy technicality in most places around the world.
 
Top