Doer
Well-Known Member
The earth is in a 23000 year wobble of the spin axis.
The Sun has variability that we are only beginning to measure. What is the 23K year Sun cycle?
Our earth orbit precesses. The moon is moving farther out. Our Solar System is
swinging thru dark energy and matter, they say. The hubris of anyone that claims to
have certain knowlege is only surpassed by
the tyranny of opinion the smuggly wield.
We are to go along with the Majority Bully?
I say, no. For those who don't slop at the
research grant trough, and still have an open
mind, let us consider the BEST study recently published. Doesn't surprise me that some see it as the latest data for man made global warming. Looking through funny colored glasses. Money Green. Luddites,
Carbon Credit traders.
Sure, if you don't read past wikipedia and the popular sources. Mostly, however, the
BEST study does not support MMGM.
BEST results found one-third of climate stations report a cooling, not a warming.
BEST concluded that land temperatures may be driven by the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) - a decadal phenomenon.
Based on this most recent temperature and CO2 information, some of which I have posted in another sub-forum.
" We can safely assume that the BEST researchers are no dummies.....that would explain their hedging comments that the human influence is 'overestimated' and that natural decadal oscillations may be driving temperatures instead of human CO2 emissions."
Other minority findings here.
http://www.c3headlines.com/global-cooling-dataevidencetrends/
Of course, you'll see character stabbing and mud slinging practiced against this, soon enough. The way of the gun, for all the vaulted snobbery.
The Sun has variability that we are only beginning to measure. What is the 23K year Sun cycle?
Our earth orbit precesses. The moon is moving farther out. Our Solar System is
swinging thru dark energy and matter, they say. The hubris of anyone that claims to
have certain knowlege is only surpassed by
the tyranny of opinion the smuggly wield.
We are to go along with the Majority Bully?
I say, no. For those who don't slop at the
research grant trough, and still have an open
mind, let us consider the BEST study recently published. Doesn't surprise me that some see it as the latest data for man made global warming. Looking through funny colored glasses. Money Green. Luddites,
Carbon Credit traders.
Sure, if you don't read past wikipedia and the popular sources. Mostly, however, the
BEST study does not support MMGM.
BEST results found one-third of climate stations report a cooling, not a warming.
BEST concluded that land temperatures may be driven by the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) - a decadal phenomenon.
Based on this most recent temperature and CO2 information, some of which I have posted in another sub-forum.
" We can safely assume that the BEST researchers are no dummies.....that would explain their hedging comments that the human influence is 'overestimated' and that natural decadal oscillations may be driving temperatures instead of human CO2 emissions."
Other minority findings here.
http://www.c3headlines.com/global-cooling-dataevidencetrends/
Of course, you'll see character stabbing and mud slinging practiced against this, soon enough. The way of the gun, for all the vaulted snobbery.