Chris Bartkowicz marijuana-grow case moves forward, could net mandatory 60 year term.

MacGuyver4.2.0

Well-Known Member
​The February arrest of Highlands Ranch marijuana grower Chris Bartkowicz, as well as his subsequent indictment, has been a rallying point for local medical-marijuana activists -- and it will continue to be so for months to come. The judge at a two-day hearing has allowed the case, which could net Bartkowicz a mandatory sixty-year sentence, to move forward.
Bartkowicz was arrested shortly after showing off his crop to a 9News reporter. Local Drug Enforcement Administration personnel saw a website piece about the interview and raided his home, which was less than 1,000 feet from a school. That and Bartkowicz's past convictions on marijuana-related charges add immeasurably to the prison jolt he could receive, notes his attorney, Joseph Saint-Veltri.
According to Saint-Veltri, the federal mandatory minimum sentence for cultivation of marijuana within 1,000 feet of a school is five years -- but that's multiplied by Bartkowicz's previous criminal history. According to the government's indictment papers, he's facing a minimum sixty-year sentence -- meaning U.S. District Judge Philip Brimmer's only discretion would be to tack on additional time, up to life in prison, not lessen it.
"Some would say this was not a crime of violence," Saint-Veltri notes. "Some would say many other people are doing what Bartkowicz is accused of doing and aren't being prosecuted at all, much less being subjected to a mandatory minimum sentence of sixty years."

​This week's hearing dealt in part with Saint-Veltri's contention that Bartkowicz's arrest was illegal because he was coerced into signing search-consent forms and waiving his right to remain silent. The prosecution argues that the search and Bartkowicz's subsequent questioning was consensual.
During the hearings, testimony cast a light on exactly what "consensual" might mean under these circumstances. On the day in question, Bartkowicz and a companion, Enoch Crago, hopped into Crago's Dodge pickup with the intention of driving to Home Deport to buy security doors. But before they could begin this journey, they were surrounded by multiple vehicles and five or six DEA personnel outfitted in full raid gear.
Crago said in court that the DEA staffers on site drew weapons, but prosecution witnesses denied that, saying their sidearms stayed hosltered. However, they confirmed the use of lights and sirens.
Despite this display of force, Judge Brimmer didn't agree with Saint-Veltri that Bartkowicz's signing of the documents had been coerced in a legal sense -- but neither did he call it consensual. Rather, at the end of the two-day hearing, Brimmer ruled that the Channel 9 story constituted the equivalent of an investigative tip that justified the feds' subsequent actions -- although he tossed some statements Bartkowicz made before inking a Miranda waiver.

Where's that leave Bartkowicz?
Saint-Veltri says the trial is slated for November 1, with pre-trial hearings scheduled two weeks prior. At that time, Saint-Veltri will make seven separate arguments to dismiss the indictment against his client.

They include suggesting that the sixty-year sentence would constitute cruel and unusual punishment and pointing out that a Justice Department memorandum directing federal authorities to defer to local laws in the fourteen states that have approved medical marijuana was never explained to the grand jury that indicted Bartkowicz.
Saint-Veltri also cites selective prosecution, noting that the Channel 9 piece that led the DEA to Bartkowicz also had information about other growers who the agency never bothered to investigate.
Oh, yes: Saint-Veltri also says "we've invited the Attorney General of the state of Colorado" -- John Suthers, who's no fan of current medical marijuana laws -- "to join us in litigating the Tenth Amendment issue" involving state's rights. Simply put, the prosecution argues that Colorado's Amendment 20, which legalized medical marijuana here, should have no bearing whatsoever on the case against Bartkowicz, because it's trumped by federal drug laws that treat marijuana as illegal at all times, no matter the use.
Whether Judge Brimmer agrees to exclude all reference to Colorado's constitution and other laws governing medical marijuana in the state will have a major impact on Bartkowicz's chances to avoid spending the next six decades in stir.
 

Dinosaur Bone

Active Member
Is this the guy with a grow-op in a [satanic] covenant controlled neighborhood, in a mid million dollar house?? The one that bragged about making more than his neighbors??

Seriously, rule of thumb.... if you live amongst NIMBY's that cannot tolerate a nieghbor with a clothesline... then likely they wont tolerate a grow-op.

Likely the DA lives in a covenant controlled neighborhood, and is friends with the type of vile and filthy lawyers who write HOA covenants. That issue should be investigated by the defense to see if there is a conflict of interest.
 

Sneezy

Well-Known Member
you now i dont feel bad for the guy! he was running a stupid illegal op and took it to the tv and let them see his illegal activities! now had he been with in his legal limit on the plants and whatnot and was still going through this i wouldnt have issue! live with in the law and you have a leg to stand on, step out side of that law and you are on your own!
 
you now i dont feel bad for the guy! he was running a stupid illegal op and took it to the tv and let them see his illegal activities! now had he been with in his legal limit on the plants and whatnot and was still going through this i wouldnt have issue! live with in the law and you have a leg to stand on, step out side of that law and you are on your own!

+1 REP. We have same problem locally!
 
yeah, this guy is a dipshit. Way over his limits, flaunting it, and tip toeing on the feds feet.

I hope he doesn't get 60 years but he's a dumb ass for advertising...
 

BadDog40

Well-Known Member
you now i dont feel bad for the guy! he was running a stupid illegal op and took it to the tv and let them see his illegal activities! now had he been with in his legal limit on the plants and whatnot and was still going through this i wouldnt have issue! live with in the law and you have a leg to stand on, step out side of that law and you are on your own!

You know he was illegal how? Because the DEA says so? Maybe you should apply for a job with them since you are so much against 'illegal' grows.
 

Sneezy

Well-Known Member
224 marijuana plants for 12 registered patients (all had the 6 count limit), but i guess you dont understand how the law works :)

lets do a little basic math 12 x 6 = hmmmm not 224 (just in case you cant count baddog the accurate count would have been 72 plants)

edited for accurate info!
 

researchkitty

Well-Known Member
Any link to the news video? Scoured the web for a few minutes but didnt find anything not even on youtube. The statements as transcribed where he's hoping to profit in the hundreds of thousands or where he said he's living the life would be funny to watch him say.

I feel bad for the guy, but the greed and "look at me I grow weed" attitude was pretty silly. Another +1 for Toronto growers eh? :)

Did the DEA arrest him because of the plant quantity, or because they knew there was plants and didnt care what it was they were gonna get it?
 

BadDog40

Well-Known Member
224 marijuana plants for 12 registered patients (all had the 6 count limit), but i guess you dont understand how the law works :)

lets do a little basic math 12 x 6 = hmmmm not 224 (just in case you cant count baddog the accurate count would have been 72 plants)

edited for accurate info!

Once again, how do you know those patients didnt have higher plant count recommendations? Regardless, most of the people on this board are illegal, do you advocate 60 years in prison for those people too? Did you never touch marijuana until A20?
 

Sneezy

Well-Known Member
actually i stopped smoking pot oh 15 or 16 years before i got my license then took up the MJ once i found out its medicinal properties and i never said i wish him 60 years but If i were him i would have keep my nose clean and the tv news out.

but here are my words of advice! if you are illegal keep your nose clean and live in the underground and keep people out of your business, but if you are out pushing that you are a legal grow and out yourself on the news in front of the world with all the knowing that you arent within the lines of the law then you deserve what you get!

and i highly doubt that his patients had edible recs or he would have somewhere between 300 and 600 plants as most docs that are writing for edibles are running 25 or 50 plants at a shot, so again i highly doubt that he was within the legal bounds of the law!

but how do you know that he was within the limits of the law? i Know a handful of dispensary owners and first they wouldnt let the news in unless they know they are completely legit and have nothing to hide (in fact i know that one of my good friends had a visit from leo sometime back and walked away scott free because they were legit and had nothing to hid) if you are legal you have a leg to stand on! if you arent you end up like this Poor SOB that could have save himself a major headache and serious prison time!

if you are illegal keep it underground with no one knowing and you are the better! but invite the tv crews in and you are just asking for trouble (leo and the likes love the morning news with dognuts and coffee didnt you know?)
 

SoCoMMJ

Well-Known Member
Even if you are legal in regard to CO law, any single plant is still a felony under federal law.

I may be a wuss, but I like to fly low and not make a big fuss regardless of legality. :)
 

iscrog4food

Active Member
Bottom line... if your growing STFU about it. Also by him going on national TV he is fucking over the rest of us who actually are doing it legit. I can hear the soccer moms now! Keep it low key and no one really cares, but start flaunting it and see how quickly the feds are knoking on your door.
 

MacGuyver4.2.0

Well-Known Member
Right above the applicant's signature line on the CO MMJ Registry Aplication Form is a statement in BOLD letters:

WARNING! THE USE, POSSESSION, DISTRIBUTION, AND MANUFACTURE OF MARIJUANA REMAINS A FEDERAL CRIME IN COLORADO, AND POSSESSION OF A REGISTRATION CARD PROVIDES NO PROTECTION WHATSOEVER AGAINST FEDERAL CRIMINAL PROSECUTION.

So regardless of whether *anyone* is 'legal' in Colorado or not, the Feds can bust anyone who *thinks* they are legal by the state laws. Sucks, but the state is *not* going to stick up for you by following the 'law' when the feds come knocking. All the state (and its politicians) care about is getting your money, end of story.
 
Does anyone understand why if there are 14 states with MMJ policies set up how can the federal govt still list herb as a schedule 1 drug??? It would seem to me if that many states accepted medicinal use along with countless lab tests proving its medicinal benefits would be a good platform in court. They say a Schedule 1 drug has no medicinal benefits but this can be argued now. I feel bad for the guy because I've seen so many people putting him down all over the internet for growing too many blah blah he's a criminal, but why is that such a bad thing. I believe most people on this site are breaking at least some laws. It's all about being free to do as you wish as long as you aren't impeding on anyone else.
 

colonuggs

Well-Known Member
what do you bros think the Feds are going to do to people in Cali.... trying to make it legal for all over 21.....

This guy wasnt on national TV....it was local news ...he said he thought he was legal otherwise he woould have never gone on TV...Alot of people dont really understand the legal points
 

TreeOfLiberty

Well-Known Member
He's going to have NOTHING when he gets out of prison.That nice $500,000 house he lived in,gone. He'll probably be without a vehicle as well. I don't pity him, for his bragging which was a foolish thing to do, even if he would've had 72 plants instead of 224, his ass would still be facing some prison time because the demonic Feds would've still went after him. He may as well had extended both middle fingers on the news interview and said "Fuck you DEA" , because he put his own self in front of their cross hairs.

His case reminds me a lot of the Modesto ,California dispensary owner Luke Scarmazzo who made a video of his self dealing weed like a thug gangster rapper, in the video Luke held up his middle fingers and said FUCK THE FEDS, even though Chris Bartkowicz didn't intentionally mean to make his self a target and believed he was legal, going on a news channel and claiming how much money your making that will be aired nation wide is going to incite DEA emotions to start yelling "REGULATORS...LET'S MOUNT UP !"

Chris Bartkowicz should not be doing time, but he should've known that his news interview was going to taunt the DEA into coming after him, even though it was a softer form of taunting, even though he had no idea of the fallout repercussions, while Scarmazzo was really trying to intentionally taunt. I've watched the Bartkowicz news interview a few times, and when he talks about the money he's bringing in....you can see his face light up and see that sly grin. Whenever someone brings up Bartkowicz' name, I can't help but to flash back in thought to the Scarmazzo video "Business Man" and what he got Scarmazzo.

When the people forget about partisan politics and use the 10th amendment to secede from the Union , it will end the power of the Feds.There will NEVER be change until there's a secession. One state seceding and the rest would fall in line, The Seceded States Of America :) ,secession would bring about legalization far faster than any other action, then cases like Bartkowicz would be non-existent.
 

SwiftGrow

Active Member
I dont care about his plant recommendations or patients he should have never talked to 9 news or let a camera crew in his house. I feel bad for his customers/patients or whatever you wanna call them because they had to go find new caregivers and probably ended up going to some crappy dispensary because there are very few good ones that actually care. Hes really getting screwed because he was next to a school from what I see. I hope he doesnt get too much time in jail its more a crime of ingorance. I imagine barkowits had some knowledge of the laws and thought everything he was doing was legal. It is easy to over look something as easy as being too close to a school most only keep track of state laws and he is being proscuted in federal court.

Barkowits is a good example of why you need to do your research and know your laws. If you comply with state and local laws and regulations as a medical patient than you will have no problems with the FEDS. The FEDs and Local law enforcement in colorado have been told as long as MMJ caregivers and patients are complying with local and state laws that law enforcement including the FEDs will leave them alone. This was announced in denver a few months ago and also by the Obama administration. As far as what will happen after our next president well shit who knows.

Anyway I hope Barkowitz gets some leanency but at the same time has learned his lesson about keeping thing quiet and within the restraint of all local and state policies.

Best of Luck and Luck is Silent
 
Top