CDx Life Presents MyDx - The First Handheld Device to Instantly Test Cannabis Samples

TonightYou

Well-Known Member
Dude you touched a nerve when I caught your bs on google to begin with. I don't think you know electronics based on your stupid rambling....
... and you would have gotten away with it If it weren't for those meddling kids!

Really why so defensive? I haven't even gotten home and stoned yet. You should see the research I can do while stoned
 

rrouse

New Member
I keep repeating myself oh a dummy ...


... and you would have gotten away with it If it weren't for those meddling kids!

Really why so defensive? I haven't even gotten home and stoned yet. You should see the research I can do while stoned
 

TonightYou

Well-Known Member
You do, like a broken record. avoiding the questions that are pertinent to this project. Why can't you answer them?

Come on cdx life mydx, can't you actually demo a working project? Can't you discuss the issues that I and others brought up? If it isn't a scam, surely you have answers.
 

rrouse

New Member
We have made prototypes. There are pictures on indigogo campaign ... this I have answered. The data isn't posted this I am trying to get resolved, period.

Isn't this the answer to your question if not what spell out clearly and I will try to answer. Come on man you are wasting my time now because I have answered this over and over again I don't know what you are asking now I guess


You do, like a broken record. avoiding the questions that are pertinent to this project. Why can't you answer them?

Come on cdx life mydx, can't you actually demo a working project? Can't you discuss the issues that I and others brought up? If it isn't a scam, surely you have answers.
 

TonightYou

Well-Known Member
So you have a nicely machined box, a mock up of a GUI for a smart phone, and a picture of an off the shelf prototype board?

Got it! You have no actual product. See, that wasn't too hard
 

rrouse

New Member
Sure I get this argument from time to time and some people think differently this is ok and we keep going forward ... full steam ahead

So you have a nicely machined box, a mock up of a GUI for a smart phone, and a picture of a prototype board?

Got it! You have no actual product.
 

TonightYou

Well-Known Member
Sure I get this argument from time to time and some people think differently this is ok and we keep going forward ... full steam ahead
hey if it ever becomes a real product in a year (I doubt it), and it worked I'd be buying it.

This was a fantastic opportunity to engage the community you seem to primarily be focused on (why I don't know, there's a much larger market in the science and school community you seem to ignore), and prove your device but you blew it. Instead you were defensive of honest questions and evasive at every opportunity.
 

rrouse

New Member
I answered the questions and you made your conclusion. I thought achieved this. Oh well ... if you want ask more I am still here ... spending my Friday talking to Mr. Ganga ... pretty surreal.


hey if it ever becomes a real product in a year (I doubt it), and it worked I'd be buying it.

This was a fantastic opportunity to engage the community you seem to primarily be focused on (why I don't know, there's a much larger market in the science and school community you seem to ignore), and prove your device but you blew it. Instead you were defensive of honest questions and evasive at every opportunity.
 

TonightYou

Well-Known Member
Does the WSJ know you are misrepresenting them? I'm sure they'd love to know you are using their brand to gain legitimacy
 

TonightYou

Well-Known Member
I answered the questions and you made your conclusion. I thought achieved this. Oh well ... if you want ask more I am still here ... spending my Friday talking to Mr. Ganga ... pretty surreal.
You are trying to do damage control, hence why you are here. I know the game.
 

rrouse

New Member
haven't read the article send me the link ... I will try to understand but you know the press can embellish things so please understand. I don't always believe what I read too

Does the WSJ know you are misrepresenting them? I'm sure they'd love to know you are using their brand to gain legitimacy
 

rrouse

New Member
but this isn't the question I thought I kept avoiding... which you keep hounding me on

haven't read the article send me the link ... I will try to understand but you know the press can embellish things so please understand. I don't always believe what I read too
 

TonightYou

Well-Known Member
haven't read the article send me the link ... I will try to understand but you know the press can embellish things so please understand. I don't always believe what I read too
It was a hired PR firm....I'm sure you saw the invoice, or used a credit card.
 

rrouse

New Member
Mr. Ganja, I honestly do not know what you are talking about. Right now I am building a printer and trying to reason with you which appears to be impossible. If you want to go over the details of this article send me the link... you seem to be pretty paranoid I guess

You are trying to do damage control, hence why you are here. I know the game.
 

TonightYou

Well-Known Member
I honestly want to know:
How far in development is it?
Do you even have a machine that is comparable to what is currently in production?
Why $20k? that's chump change for a start up that is apparently this far along.
Why are you loose on dates?
Why do you mention R and D, you should be passed that if you were having a product go out to market in less than a year.
What's the tolerance?
How reliable is it?


Those should be pretty easy questions to answer.
 

TonightYou

Well-Known Member
Mr. Ganja, I honestly do not know what you are talking about. Right now I am building a printer and trying to reason with you which appears to be impossible. If you want to go over the details of this article send me the link... you seem to be pretty paranoid I guess
I despise con artists and vapor ware, especially in a community I care about. You may have good intentions, but from your posts thus far, I'm not seeing it
 

rrouse

New Member
Here are your answers

I honestly want to know:
How far in development is it?
I have answered this ... its been a product of about 1 year of focused research and a product of years of research through our parters.

Do you even have a machine that is comparable to what is currently in production?
Yes but this depends on perspective. The electronics is functional this exists (aka the reader). The Indigogo compaign is for supporting custom sensors.

Why $20k? that's chump change for a start up that is apparently this far along.
Well this will be used to support the sensor manufacturing costs. Keep in mind those special printers I sell cost around $80K. So there is a bit of overhead to set up a focused lab to make this initial sensors.

Why are you loose on dates?
This sort depends on many variables but one big one is the amount of money we will be able to invest into venture. Also some RandD is going too and this takes time due to unforeseeable issues.

Why do you mention R and D, you should be passed that if you were having a product go out to market in less than a year.
We are in RandD still there is nothing wrong with that and I hope can be successful in having the crowd support it and it be used for other scientific endeavors. Crowd sourced science can be a good thing if done right we want to do it right that is why its important I addressed your bantering. If we are not being cool then I want to understand why and explain this to my colleagues.

What's the tolerance?
We probably are not there yet but industry standard for assay developing in small sensors like this is around 5% and we have realized this in our evaluation process.

How reliable is it?
We are not there yet and this can be sometimes a subjective perception. Just like how you say we have no product.

Those should be pretty easy questions to answer.
 

TonightYou

Well-Known Member
Generic answers. so you don't even have the sensors... which is what makes the machine work.

And 20k isn't going to be able to offset those costs, come on! Look at other electronic crowd sourced projects. So from your own answers now, no you don't have a tested machine to read terpenoids, thc, thcv, cbd, and it is +/- 5%...

This is the root of my concern this is a scam, or at best an ill advised failed startup which won't materialize a promised device.

Thank you for your responses.
 

rrouse

New Member
No we do have the prototype sensor for cannabis and have data for this which I am trying to get disclosed. We also have a general sensor this is well characterized and was developed a long time ago which we want to support. And we want to make other sensors for these additional applications.

There are some sensor format electronics needed to meet the small device design specs.

But I guess we have about 100 people signed up, so that's a relatively small batch for manufacture. In this aspect I like the Indigogo thing since we can focus on meeting these orders support this small group. Then learn how to manufacture at a larger scale.

Yes we are a small startup trying to find our way the best we can ... that's how it rolls I guess

Generic answers. so you don't even have the sensors... which is what makes the machine work.

And 20k isn't going to be able to offset those costs, come on! Look at other electronic crowd sourced projects. So from your own answers now, no you don't have a tested machine to read terpenoids, thc, thcv, cbd, and it is +/- 5%...

This is the root of my concern this is a scam, or at best an ill advised failed startup which won't materialize a promised device.

Thank you for your responses.
 

rrouse

New Member
This is highly irresponsible ... I think you are an asshole I maybe civil but you are a total asshole for the record

I despise con artists and vapor ware, especially in a community I care about. You may have good intentions, but from your posts thus far, I'm not seeing it
 
Top