"Carbon dioxide global Climate change" is a hoax and fraud

Grandpapy · Mar 31, 2017

SneekyNinja said:
You act like a Trump supporter, you're given facts but concoct your own narrative.

So please, feel free to wallow in your own ignorance.

Can you see why your "New Party" has only 3 supporters?

Lol, a party promoted by a dumb-dumb, a racist and a rapist.

Is the volcano dormant or extinct or still active? The Yellowstone Volcano is still active.

How Much Notice Before Yellowstone's Supervolcano Erupts?
www.yellowstonepark.com/yellowstone-supervolcano/

https://www.google.com/search?q=is+yellowstone+active?&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

Are Corporations people? if so are they Dem, Repub, socialist, liberal, christian, Buddhist?

Shouldn't they have their own party, say the Bawndo party?

SneekyNinja · Mar 31, 2017

Grandpapy said:
Is the volcano dormant or extinct or still active? The Yellowstone Volcano is still active.

How Much Notice Before Yellowstone's Supervolcano Erupts?
www.yellowstonepark.com/yellowstone-supervolcano/

https://www.google.com/search?q=is+yellowstone+active?&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

Are Corporations people? if so are they Dem, Repub, socialist, liberal, christian, Buddhist?

Shouldn't they have their own party, say the Bawndo party?

My word...

Volcanos have 3 states.

Extinct: No magma chamber. Dead.

Dormant: Has magma chamber. Surrounding area likely has geological activity. Not actively erupting and hasn't erupted in at least 10,000 years.

Active: Erupting.

"Active" in the sense on that website is the same as the difference between the scientific use of "theory" and it's common use.

If Yellowstone was active in the sense that a vulcanologist would use that word, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

Grandpapy · Mar 31, 2017

err, the volcanic "Activity" is causing hydro, thermal and gaseous, and geological "Eruptions".

But yea, it's dormant.

SneekyNinja · Mar 31, 2017

Grandpapy said:
err, the volcanic "Activity" is causing hydro, thermal and gaseous, and geological "Eruptions".

But yea, it's dormant.

Listen, I'm just using the terms that vulcanologists use.

You know, the dudes that study volcanos?

I'll trust them over what some internet gaylords say, you probably should too.

(FYI, you're doing the exact same thing that stupid Republican climate deniers do.)

Time for bed, try learn something while I'm sleeping.

Grandpapy · Mar 31, 2017

Is the volcano still active?
Yes. The park’s many hydrothermal features attest to the heat still beneath this area. Earthquakes—1,000 to 3,000 per year—also reveal activity below ground. The University of Utah Seismograph Station tracks this activity closely.

Who tells Volcanologist of Seismic Activity?
Oil Industry needs restraint, not Volcanoes.

SneekyNinja · Mar 31, 2017

Grandpapy said:
Is the volcano still active?
Yes. The park’s many hydrothermal features attest to the heat still beneath this area. Earthquakes—1,000 to 3,000 per year—also reveal activity below ground. The University of Utah Seismograph Station tracks this activity closely.

Who tells Volcanologist of Seismic Activity?
Oil Industry needs restraint, not Volcanoes.

I'm one of the most active proponents for solar that there is, tapping a volcano is retarded for a multitude of reasons.

But that doesnt change the fact that the actual definition for an active volcano is one that has erupted in the last 10,000 years (also known as the Holocene era).

I can give you 1000 sources from a multitude of universities, dictionaries and almost every other type of reference there is that show this to be the case... but you're hanging onto what is written on one website who was probably using "lay terms" to explain to the general public?

Grandpapy · Mar 31, 2017

SneekyNinja said:
I'm one of the most active proponents for solar that there is, tapping a volcano is retarded for a multitude of reasons.

But that doesnt change the fact that the actual definition for an active volcano is one that has erupted in the last 10,000 years.

I can give you 1000 sources from a multitude of universities, dictionaries and almost every other type of reference there is that show this to be the case... but you're hanging onto what is written on one website who was probably using "lay terms" to explain to the general public?

Well calling an idea mentally challenged is debatable, we have been doing it for hundreds of years. I'm not sure of the method you have in mind.

Perhaps you have something to gain?

"the Big Three were more interested in convincing CARB members that electric vehicles were not technologically and commercially viable."

^^^Whats retarded is our addiction to oil.

SneekyNinja · Mar 31, 2017

Grandpapy said:
Well calling an idea mentally challenged is debatable, we have been doing it for hundreds of years. I'm not sure of the method you have in mind.

Perhaps you have something to gain?

"the Big Three were more interested in convincing CARB members that electric vehicles were not technologically and commercially viable."

^^^Whats retarded is our addiction to oil.

Read back in this thread.

One of the right wingers said they wanted to directly tap the magma chamber in Yellowstone for geothermal power.

I said why would you tap a dormant volcano like that because removing energy could result in chemical/pressure changes that could cause it to become active (ie erupt).

Ttystick came along and said "Ugh, Yellowstone isn't dormant, its active!".

That's where the whole active versus dormant debate in this thread came from, his misunderstanding of the difference between dormant and extinct.

Grandpapy · Mar 31, 2017

A right winger? Damn, he was good. I was the one distracted from the problem at hand.

SneekyNinja · Mar 31, 2017

Grandpapy said:
A right winger? Damn, he was good. I was the one distracted from the problem at hand.

But if we can't even use the correct terms in our discussions how can we claim any sort of credibility when debating the right wingers about the subjects that do matter?

I still say solar is key though btw. Large (and ever increasing) energy output per m2.

We could just put them everywhere, side of the streets (no, not solar roadways cos that's a complete fail), along the center divide on the freeway.

Water desalination, energy production, electric car charging.

The amount of power you could store in batteries in the footprint of a modern power station is insane too.

ttystikk · Mar 31, 2017

SneekyNinja said:
But if we can't even use the correct terms in our discussions how can we claim any sort of credibility when debating the right wingers about the subjects that do matter?

I still say solar is key though btw. Large (and ever increasing) energy output per m2.

We could just put them everywhere, side of the streets (no, not solar roadways cos that's a complete fail), along the center divide on the freeway.

Water desalination, energy production, electric car charging.

The amount of power you could store in batteries in the footprint of a modern power station is insane too.

Solar roofing; keeps the house cool while generating power; power generation is even matched to times of highest usage.

"NO BRAINER"

SneekyNinja · Mar 31, 2017

ttystikk said:
Solar roofing; keeps the house cool while generating power; power generation is even matched to times of highest usage.

"NO BRAINER"

That's a decision the individuals need to make based on cost or whatever (some people just don't do "long term" well) but there's really no excuse for the Federal Govt not to utilise public property better to produce solar energy.

(Id argue the Feds should offer a 100% tax credit for the public to purchase them but that's just me).

I'm surprised the military hasn't invested heavily in it considering their constant paranoia.

LittleMan80 · Apr 8, 2017

Here is my take: There is a baseline of basic needs. Those would be keeping the water pollution free, low emissions, recycling, safe disposal of pollutants, gas. I'm sure I missed a couple things, but that's mainly it. Doesn't anyone notice that the government NEVER scales back on anything? They want more money and to get more they have to impose new laws. If the government can make you believe that something fake is a problem, then their fix is easy and they can make an endless amount of money off of it. Lots of people believe in global warming, but those same people don't think it will ever affect them. Also, if carbon dioxide is so bad for the planet, why do greenhouse growers buy co2 generators to double plant growth? Just think that is in a greenhouse where your in a confined environment. Outside you are NOT. We don't live in a bubble.

Why did the left change it from Global Warming in 2014 to Climate Change? Why is climate change politicized? Why did all those climate fighting companies, like Solyndra go belly up after getting millions in subsidies from the government? Those same companies should do awesome now in the private market since Trump has scaled back on everything, right? Prior to 2014, has anyone heard the words Polar Vortex? The left created that to make you think winter is caused by global warming. Anyone remember when the liberals ship got stuck in the ice? One of the ways they have always sought to convince you that the world is warming is not the climate where you live, but rather where you aren’t, where you can’t see what is really happening. So they tell you the ice is melting at the North Pole and the South Pole. And then they publish pictures, which are fraudulent pictures of poor little polar bears stranded on three square feet of ice that you are told used to be the North Pole. The left is able to promote this because the media rams it down our throats. But from the election, we all know the media isn't always right. Also, NOAA was caught changing temperatures in the early 1900s just so that they could promote that global warming is happening.

I'm not going to link up where I got all my information from, but anyone who questions it just search...for example "NOAA caught changing data" "global warming activists ship stuck" Solyndra wasting taxpayer money goes out of business" Obama green companies fail" "Electric car motors have coal in them"

The left has this "herd mentality" where no one can think for themselves. I've read comments like people saying now that Trump has scaled back on the EPA that thousands of species of animals are now going to die. Lmao!

UncleBuck · Apr 8, 2017

LittleMan80 said:
I'm not going to link up where I got all my information from

that's OK, we know you got it from a flat-earther blog and that your penis is remarkably tiny and unsatisfying to men and women.

LittleMan80 · Apr 8, 2017

UncleBuck said:
that's OK, we know you got it from a flat-earther blog and that your penis is remarkably tiny and unsatisfying to men and women.

Haha if you only knew who I really am. You'd feel lucky to have any of my throwbacks. I'm really not short. Quite the opposite in fact and hung. Why would anyone put their real info on a site like this?

UncleBuck · Apr 8, 2017

LittleMan80 said:
Haha if you only knew who I really am. You'd feel lucky to have any of my throwbacks. I'm really not short. Quite the opposite in fact and hung. Why would anyone put their real info on a site like this?

your tiny penis insecurity is glaring and obvious.

SneekyNinja · Apr 8, 2017

LittleMan80 said:
Here is my take: There is a baseline of basic needs. Those would be keeping the water pollution free, low emissions, recycling, safe disposal of pollutants, gas. I'm sure I missed a couple things, but that's mainly it. Doesn't anyone notice that the government NEVER scales back on anything? They want more money and to get more they have to impose new laws. If the government can make you believe that something fake is a problem, then their fix is easy and they can make an endless amount of money off of it. Lots of people believe in global warming, but those same people don't think it will ever affect them. Also, if carbon dioxide is so bad for the planet, why do greenhouse growers buy co2 generators to double plant growth? Just think that is in a greenhouse where your in a confined environment. Outside you are NOT. We don't live in a bubble.

Why did the left change it from Global Warming in 2014 to Climate Change? Why is climate change politicized? Why did all those climate fighting companies, like Solyndra go belly up after getting millions in subsidies from the government? Those same companies should do awesome now in the private market since Trump has scaled back on everything, right? Prior to 2014, has anyone heard the words Polar Vortex? The left created that to make you think winter is caused by global warming. Anyone remember when the liberals ship got stuck in the ice? One of the ways they have always sought to convince you that the world is warming is not the climate where you live, but rather where you aren’t, where you can’t see what is really happening. So they tell you the ice is melting at the North Pole and the South Pole. And then they publish pictures, which are fraudulent pictures of poor little polar bears stranded on three square feet of ice that you are told used to be the North Pole. The left is able to promote this because the media rams it down our throats. But from the election, we all know the media isn't always right. Also, NOAA was caught changing temperatures in the early 1900s just so that they could promote that global warming is happening.

I'm not going to link up where I got all my information from, but anyone who questions it just search...for example "NOAA caught changing data" "global warming activists ship stuck" Solyndra wasting taxpayer money goes out of business" Obama green companies fail" "Electric car motors have coal in them"

The left has this "herd mentality" where no one can think for themselves. I've read comments like people saying now that Trump has scaled back on the EPA that thousands of species of animals are now going to die. Lmao!

Electric cars have coal in them?

By the same logic so do pencils...

The difference is coal is for burning.

Tl;Dr You're a dumbass.

LittleMan80 · Apr 8, 2017

UncleBuck said:
your tiny penis insecurity is glaring and obvious.

Lol...You liberals are too easy to figure out. One innuendo after another hoping for one person to question themselves and EVERY response is personal. Your quite obvious IMMEDIATELY going for the small penis comment and unsatisfying to men and women. Your the one overcompensating. I let my actions speak for themselves. Your just a keyboard warrior lol. But hey. Your welcome to the insults. Keep em' coming. I g2g build my bunker. The apocalypse is coming since Donald scaled back on the EPA. Just like in 1999 with Y2K. Stock up on water and food.

twostrokenut · Apr 8, 2017

ttystikk said:
I'm short

Somehow we all knew this already.

UncleBuck · Apr 8, 2017

LittleMan80 said:
Lol...You liberals are too easy to figure out. One innuendo after another hoping for one person to question themselves and EVERY response is personal. Your quite obvious IMMEDIATELY going for the small penis comment and unsatisfying to men and women. Your the one overcompensating. I let my actions speak for themselves. Your just a keyboard warrior lol. But hey. Your welcome to the insults. Keep em' coming. I g2g build my bunker. The apocalypse is coming since Donald scaled back on the EPA. Just like in 1999 with Y2K. Stock up on water and food.

does it physically hurt to be so stupid?

"Carbon dioxide global Climate change" is a hoax and fraud

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member