CALLING ALL HASH AND WAX MAKERS!!!!!!!!!

D_Urbmon

D_Urbmon

Well-Known Member
Gquebed said:
Well then. How is it different? The process? What explained in your previous post does cover that....
Click to expand...
The process is entirely different. Gently sifted atop a 110 lpi screen to separate plant material from trichome heads and stalks, while on a 2nd screen (195lpi) the trichome heads are futher separated from the capitate stalks and micro pieces of plant matter with the use of static.

As opposed to thrashing a bunch of bud together with dry ice chunks using a single screen to separate, where a bunch of plant matter and a TON of capitate stalks get through along with the trichome heads.




It's clear you don't know the difference between a capitate stalk and a glandular trichome head or a cystolithic hair. It's all the same to you because your hash has all of it in copious amounts, with exception to glandular trichome heads.

and to quote a wise man.....
PKHydro said:
Do some research. You clearly have no fucking clue what your talking about.
Click to expand...
 
hyroot

hyroot

Well-Known Member
D_Urbmon said:
The process is entirely different. Gently sifted atop a 110 lpi screen to separate plant material from trichome heads and stalks, while on a 2nd screen (195lpi) the trichome heads are futher separated from the capitate stalks and micro pieces of plant matter with the use of static.

As opposed to thrashing a bunch of bud together with dry ice chunks using a single screen to separate, where a bunch of plant matter and a TON of capitate stalks get through along with the trichome heads.




It's clear you don't know the difference between a capitate stalk and a glandular trichome head or a cystolithic hair. It's all the same to you because your hash has all of it in copious amounts, with exception to glandular trichome heads.

and to quote a wise man.....
Click to expand...
.don't even bother with this guy. He is going to reply to this with some asenine foolish remark that will just frustrate you. He will probably insult you as well. He refuses to read. He has probably never grown or made anything ever.
 
D_Urbmon

D_Urbmon

Well-Known Member
Gquebed said:
Prove it. Put up a vid of dry sift and a vid of dry ice method and then explain how they are different....

You wont because anybody can see that the only difference is the ice andbthe violence of the shake vs the sift.

Same process...same result. Except one is faster and the other maybe somewhat purer, if the sift is gentler

Thats all. Particulate matter in both....
Click to expand...
I don't make videos. I already posted a macro photo of some 95%+ pure heads dry sift. You are welcome to post a macro photo of your equal purity dry ice hash, but we all know that it doesn't exist.
 
Gquebed

Gquebed

Well-Known Member
D_Urbmon said:
I don't make videos. I already posted a macro photo of some 95%+ pure heads dry sift. You are welcome to post a macro photo of your equal purity dry ice hash, but we all know that it doesn't exist.
Click to expand...
I never said anything about equal purity. Apparently you didnt read my original post correctly. You might want to....just to see what a fool youve been ...
 
Gquebed

Gquebed

Well-Known Member
D_Urbmon said:
I don't make videos. I already posted a macro photo of some 95%+ pure heads dry sift. You are welcome to post a macro photo of your equal purity dry ice hash, but we all know that it doesn't exist.
Click to expand...
Below is a copy pasty of most of my original post... tell where the term equal purity was used?

Awesome product all around.
Some will say their way is better and purer and they may be right.
BUT. Those ways are messy, time consuming and often dangerous. So the best bang for you buck and your time is dry ice....
 
D_Urbmon

D_Urbmon

Well-Known Member
Gquebed said:
Bullshit.
The process is basically the same so.... the result is basically the same. Dont be a moron.
Click to expand...
"result is basically the same" insinuates equal purity.

process and result are nowhere near "basically the same".


Keep trying.
 
hyroot

hyroot

Well-Known Member
Best dry sift there is by Cuban grower. His sift goes for $150 a gram. That's because he wins almost every cup he enters his dry sift

Notice how it's pure heads and no plant matter at all

Screenshot_2015-12-02-16-27-16.png

Macro shot of sift

Screenshot_2015-12-02-16-33-47.png
 
Last edited:
PKHydro

PKHydro

Well-Known Member
hyroot said:
He does. He runs Kimbo kush, cookies and cream, and ghost og. He slow dries his flowers for 4 weeks in a 50 degree room. Then cures his flowers for 4 months to 1 year in the same room before making dry sift.
Click to expand...
Labour of love, no wonder it's the best.
 
Gquebed

Gquebed

Well-Known Member
Interesting... you would do well at CNN or Fox.

Couple things... find a vid of the worst possible hack to demonstrate dry ice method, straight from flowers, and then compare that to a guy who is refining resin that was already seperated from flowers.... hardly a fair comparison... but then dont show that guys final product...show somebody elses???

If the dry ice resin was sifted twice you would get a more pure result too...

But thankks for proving the point i made about the process being basically the same...resin forced through a screen... same shit different pile...
 
hyroot

hyroot

Well-Known Member
Gquebed said:
Interesting... you would do well at CNN or Fox.

Couple things... find a vid of the worst possible hack to demonstrate dry ice method, straight from flowers, and then compare that to a guy who is refining resin that was already seperated from flowers.... hardly a fair comparison... but then dont show that guys final product...show somebody elses???

If the dry ice resin was sifted twice you would get a more pure result too...

But thankks for proving the point i made about the process being basically the same...resin forced through a screen... same shit different pile...
Click to expand...

You sift through multiple screens. To make a clean product.

With dry ice you use an extract bag with dry ice. and the dry ice breaks up the plant material to such fine grade that it's impossible to remove or refine with screens.

Not even close to being the same.

Again do some research.
 
D_Urbmon

D_Urbmon

Well-Known Member
Also I was lucky enough to get a response from cuban in chat on church one day.


If anyone was wondering he uses 61 lpi, 86 lpi, 125 lpi and 180 lpi but that's all he was willing to tell me. A bit different than the sizes Bubbleman sells. Of course these could be tuned for his grow methods and strains/ head sizes so it may give varying results for others.

I wish the guy would stop selling hash already so he could share his secrets with the world. Till then I respect that he doesn't want to give too much information because it's his occupation. Can't exactly expect him to give out the recipe to his secret sauce. :weed:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top