Bigoted comments from the right-wing website "Free Republic"

MidwesternGro

Well-Known Member
A bigoted conservative piece of shit made the following comment about gay people, in a thread titled "Tired of Whining Homosexuals" the meconium stated:

"They [gays] are just a particularly vicious substrata of the malcontent class, the same as the junkies, the criminals, the OWS kiddies. You can only loathe them while at the same time seeing their tragedy. Much like the eunuch class in ancient Asian societies, they are devious power-brokers, but the reality is most people secretly hate them even if they are publicly PC (just look at Alec Baldwin), that and the fact that they are so intrinsically twisted and abnormal.

11 posted on Tuesday, April 22, 2014 6:34:05 PM by Viennacon"


http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3147489/posts#11

Way to go!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
yeah cuz national socialism and government control of the market is so "right wing"

you daffy twit, mussolini's fascism is part of the marxist rainbow, it's one of dozens of flavours of socialism in circulation.

and yes, every one of them is LEFT WING
didn't you call me a socialist because i said i believe in private ownership of the means of production?

you are mccarthy in racist clownshoes.
 

Abiqua

Well-Known Member
You're one deluded commie. If that's your definition of a Democrat, then none exist and never have existed.
Jerry Brown seems to follow that path...just sayin. Feinstein? Why anyone would pick either "side" is comical to begin with. We are an oligarchy. Pretty much have been, since the day we "decided" to kill "Kennedy" and a new President, not elected, was chosen. Although it was long before that. Really started when the 1st Oligarchy tried to copy the Iroquois Confed, to keep em pacified. To each their own.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
You won't see liberals making comments like that. Only racist conservatives, some of whom publish racist newsletters like Ron Paul did. Ron Paul is a racist piece of shit.
http://www.salon.com/2013/12/04/martin_bashir_resigns_from_msnbc_over_controversial_sarah_palin_comment/

thisscreenname Dec 5, 2013
Yes, it's hard to avoid the obvious observation that, when it comes to Palin's mouth, the shit tends to flow in the other direction. But watch the clip: Bashir didn't say, as the headlines and Fox-News-ish stories have implied, that "someone should shit in Sarah Palin's mouth." He cited two historical anecdotes among the many true abominations of slavery and wrapped up by saying that if anyone was fit for such punishment, given the nonsensical and irresponsible comparison she made between the national debt and slavery, it would be her. If he'd said -- as many have -- that she should be tarred and feathered, nobody would have blinked an eye. I have no idea what Palin thought she meant when she said what she said, but Bashir was simply pointing out how grossly, offensively inappropriate her comment was. Now, I've thought Bashir was a sleazebag ever since I saw his Michael Jackson doc, but I don't think the way he expressed himself here was out of line at all.

3LikeReply
ChingarraSan Dec 5, 2013
I was under the impression that someone had already shit in Palin's mouth considering the shit that comes out of it. But wait, she is full of shit, that must be the reason shit spews from her mouth. Yup! Sarah! The half term governor of Alaska, and failed vice presidential candidate! Go Sarah GO! You do know where you can go, don't you Sarah!?

1LikeReply
Manny47 Dec 5, 2013
There was no shame in speaking the truth and showing your outrage with these buffoons, Mr. Bashir, that call themselves either journalists or reporters on the opposing network (Fart News Network.) The sheer hypocrisy and charlatans that these either ex-politician or Wall Street whores that come on air-to express corporate greed and boot licking personalities is quite offensive than a few words that righteous fools feel offended. The vast influence of military/corporate complex has really been more offensive to our common interests and will not be shared with open minded viewers. Even the MSNBC is owned by corporate controlled figures that have no face on this network either.

1LikeReply
Eric Arthur Blair Dec 5, 2013
I don't see what all the fuss is about. All he did was suggest that Palin eat her own turds...er...words.

2LikeReply
artpiece Dec 5, 2013
Kudos to Martin Bashir for having the courage for standing up to the plate and calling what we all see...(ahem, Mouth full of Shit Sara Palin)...

3LikeReply
jethro bodine Dec 5, 2013
i hope martin bashir creates his own blog, i would gladly pay to read his unfiltered words. Fuck msnbc for letting go alec baldwin and martin bashir

guestatguestdotcom Dec 5, 2013
Fox representatives have said things ten times worse and the never resign. Democrats always turn the other cheek.

2LikeReply
Uncleike Dec 5, 2013
Rush Limbaugh says something worse every day. Likewise O'Reilly, Beck, and those Fox couch clowns.

3LikeReply
WestchesterBill Dec 5, 2013
Hoisted on his own petard of faux rectitude. Priceless!

LikeReply
cosliberal1 Dec 5, 2013
While I do think Bashir was a bot over the top, his point was well made. This woman has s**t for brains, lies like a rug, talks s**t about anyone who doesn't worship her stupidity, and is generallt full of s**t. it only makes sense that someone place said substance in her mouth.

4LikeReply
monocogphil Dec 5, 2013
I see the corpulent keyboard cowboys are defending their whack-off queen.

"Sarah, Sarah..."


just from one salon dot com article about bashir's shit eating comments.

yeah lefties are so classy.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
awwwww, kkkynes is upset that people want sarah palin to eat her own shit after making an offensive comparison between slavery and the national debt.

too bad it doesn't compare at all to the racist remarks kynes has made himself, nor does it compare to the racist comments that make up a vast percentage of what you see after any foxnews or freerepublic article.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
To: Olog-hai
Giving even a fraction of an inch to the sodomites opens the door to abortion on demand and legalizing pedophilia. The fascists pushing the evil homosexual agenda are the same crowd of leftists that advocates the creation of baby killing factories.

4 posted on Tuesday, April 22, 2014 11:11:17 PM by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3147532/posts#4

Yep, sounds like a conservative to me.
Bigoted, racist comments from left-wing US Attorney General:

"In 2012, Attorney General Eric Holder made an eye-opening statement during an appearance at Columbia University. In backing racial preferences, he said he “can’t actually imagine a time in which the need for more diversity would ever cease. . . . The question is not when does [affirmative action] end, but when does it begin. . . . When do people of color truly get the benefits to which they are entitled?”

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/376358/raced-based-preferences-forever-john-fund/page/0/1
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Bigoted, racist comments from left-wing US Attorney General:

"In 2012, Attorney General Eric Holder made an eye-opening statement during an appearance at Columbia University. In backing racial preferences, he said he “can’t actually imagine a time in which the need for more diversity would ever cease. . . . The question is not when does [affirmative action] end, but when does it begin. . . . When do people of color truly get the benefits to which they are entitled?”

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/376358/raced-based-preferences-forever-john-fund/page/0/1
what's racist about that?
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Bigoted, racist comments from left-wing US Attorney General:

"In 2012, Attorney General Eric Holder made an eye-opening statement during an appearance at Columbia University. In backing racial preferences, he said he “can’t actually imagine a time in which the need for more diversity would ever cease. . . . The question is not when does [affirmative action] end, but when does it begin. . . . When do people of color truly get the benefits to which they are entitled?”

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/376358/raced-based-preferences-forever-john-fund/page/0/1
lulz.

"we need more diversity..." but only one type, to the exclusion of all else.
 

MidwesternGro

Well-Known Member
An unflushed conservative stinking up the punch bowl stated in a thread titled "Opposing Gay Marriage Doesn't Make You a Crypto-Racist" that:

"Neither one are natural. Though a white man marrying a black woman doesn’t mean they are going to hell like a pair of faggots.


8 posted on Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:27:10 PM by sipow"


http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3148384/posts#8

Racism and homophobia! Good job right-wingers!
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
Of course whites marrying blacks is unnatural. I'm nature the two lived hundreds, if not thousands of miles apart.

Only through technology, which is not nature, have the two groups been brought into enough contact to have any significant intermarrying.
 
Top