base nutrients grow

BASE NUTRIENTS OR THE WHOLE NUTRIENT LINE

  • BASE NUTES

    Votes: 18 72.0%
  • USE BASE AND ALL THE OTHER NUTES

    Votes: 7 28.0%

  • Total voters
    25

homebrewer

Well-Known Member
your report is from 2001.

homebrewer... it is impossible to over fertilise a plant. the burnign you see is necrosis caused by a K deficiency. this is common knowledge now. what they taught ten years ago they do not teach today... because it is wrong for the most part.
My link is from a University and yours is still missing. Where is your link?
 

skunkushybrid01

Well-Known Member

skunkushybrid01

Well-Known Member
ScienceDaily (May 29, 2009) — While proving a long-held theory that suberin blocks water and nutrient absorption in plants, a Purdue University scientist learned more about manipulating the substance to better feed plants.

It has long been believed that suberin, a waxy substance between some plant cells, acts as a barrier for the movement of water in a plant's roots. David E. Salt, a professor of plant molecular physiology, discovered a mutant form of the plant Arabidopsis- enhanced suberin 1 or ESB1 - with twice as much suberin as wild varieties, giving him a way to test the theory.
Salt also discovered which pathways particular nutrients use to get into a plant's shoots based on suberin concentration. By adjusting the amount of suberin in roots, Salt said plants could be engineered to allow for easier absorption of beneficial nutrients.
"This is the first time that the dogma in the textbooks has been tested genetically. It's been known for a long time that this material exists in the cell, but there's been no genetic proof to show what it does," Salt said. "We now have another tool in our toolbox to manipulate how plants take up water and mineral nutrients."
Using the plant with twice the amount of suberin, Salt showed that the plant activated a defense mechanism to keep from wilting. Since suberin was restricting water absorption, the plant allowed less transpiration, or evaporation of water from the leaves.
To further prove the theory, Salt was able to cut shoots off the wild-type plants and graft them onto mutant roots, and vice versa. The nutrient compositions in the shoots changed, reflecting the effect suberin in the roots had on the plants' absorption ability.
"You put a mutant root onto a wild-type shoot and the elemental composition in the wild-type shoot starts to look like a mutant shoot," Salt said. "We saw the same thing with water loss."
Some nutrients use a symplastic route, moving through cells' cytoplasm to gain access to the plant. Others use an apoplastic route, moving through the outer cell walls. The suberin acts as a filter, blocking some water from passing through cell walls. The more suberin, the more difficult it is for nutrients to pass through the cell walls.
"Just like animals, plants want to select the things they take in," Salt said. "They want a certain amount of potassium or a certain amount of nitrogen. This allows them to choose how much they get."
In Salt's experiments, the plants with more suberin had less calcium, manganese and zinc in their leaves, meaning a significant amount of those nutrients pass apoplastically through the root. Sodium, sulfur, selenium, molybdenum and arsenic showed higher concentrations, meaning they are generally absorbed symplastically.
The plants with more suberin - which decreased transpiration - used the water they were able to absorb more efficiently. Salt said plants could be genetically engineered for specific amounts of suberin so they would more easily absorb beneficial nutrients and use less water in a more efficient manner.
The National Science Foundation funded Salt's research. The next step is to determine the role of the ESB1 gene in suberin biosynthesis.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090522154506.htm
 

homebrewer

Well-Known Member
Where in your links does it specifically say that you cannot over-fertilize a plant? Where does it specifically state that nutrient toxicities do not exist?
 

skunkushybrid01

Well-Known Member
Where in your links does it specifically say that you cannot over-fertilize a plant? Where does it specifically state that nutrient toxicities do not exist?

All the way through... you just need toknow what you're reading. There is a direct quote from Salt himself in my last post....

if you still don't get it yet there is nothing more i can do... it's all there for you if you know what you're reading. I cannot teach a chimp to tango in 5 minutes, so i have no patience for this childish bullshit.
 

homebrewer

Well-Known Member
All the way through... you just need toknow what you're reading. There is a direct quote from Salt himself in my last post....

if you still don't get it yet there is nothing more i can do... it's all there for you if you know what you're reading. I cannot teach a chimp to tango in 5 minutes, so i have no patience for this childish bullshit.
Again, WHERE does it specifically state that you cannot over-fertilize a plant??? You're incorrectly drawing your own conclusions from an article that speaks nothing of nutrient toxicities or high salinity.

We're all waiting for your cut-and-pasted quote.
 

burrr

Active Member
Skunky, thats kinda funny. You can take an article about suberin, and its role in water and nutrient uptake, then come to the conclusion that you cant over fertilize a plant! I skimmed over the two links, and dude, plants have varying levels of suberin. This explains why some plants will get nitrogen toxicity at low levels of feeding, and others can take heavy doses.

"it is impossible to over-fertilize a plant" is one of the most ignorant things I've seen someone try to pass off as fact. It will end up in somebodys sig line for sure.
 

burrr

Active Member
You have to read all of the sentences, not just the ones you like.

The suberin acts as a filter, blocking some water from passing through cell walls. The more suberin, the more difficult it is for nutrients to pass through the cell walls.
 

skunkushybrid01

Well-Known Member
LOL.

this place has gone right down hill... or maybe just those with intell;igence and that know how to read properly are keeping out of it. I can't put this any clearer, even in salt's own words from 2009 this is not enough for you... here they are again. it says it all perfectly:

"Just like animals, plants want to select the things they take in," Salt said. "They want a certain amount of potassium or a certain amount of nitrogen. This allows them to choose how much they get."

can you read that? Just like animals, just like we choose what we eat and the amounts we choose to do so...


the difference here is that you fucking idiots just want to argue... how can you continue to argue when it makes perfect logical sense? I have grown plants in 4.0 in DWC, LOL... i have grown seedlings in a 3.2EC concentration... you dickheads are so ignorant you don't even deserve to hear the results. fucking morons.
 

burrr

Active Member
You are a fucking idiot! The role of suberin is to allow plants to have some control on the nutes they absorb. They have not yet created the mutant pot plant yet, with elevated suberin levels. Until then, we can still burn our plants. You are creating your own conclusions, not the one that is real.
 

skunkushybrid01

Well-Known Member
the elevated suberin test plant was just to test the theory.... the theory was already in place but there was no proof. the mutant plant provides that proof. plants increase suberin levels depending ont he nutrients they need to absorb... no need to be a mutant.

LOL. keep skimming maybe in a year or two you will have skimmed enough to finally get it.

You guys don't even deserve this info... i highly regret sharing it with you. Luckily there are plenty of other people reading that will understand what i've written here, even if it's ina few years. whatever... one day you will climb out of the box and realisation will dawn.
 

burrr

Active Member
Well, all of you folks that are worthy of this info, go ahead and feed the hell outa your plants with some 20-20-20.

In the real world, we know that plants can over feed.
DR Salt even mentions specifically that some hydroponic corn had almost no suberin, and that mangroves living in salt water have extreme concentrations of suberin. You act like you've made some great new discovery, but nute burn is old news.

http://www.usu.edu/cpl/research_hydroponics3.htm#removal


MANAGING NUTRIENTS BY MASS BALANCE During the past 12 years, we have managed nutrients in closed hydroponic systems according to the principle of "mass balance," which means that the mass of nutrients is either in solution or in the plants. We add nutrients to the solution depending on what we want the plant to take up.

Plants quickly remove their daily supply of some nutrients while other nutrients accumulate. This means that the concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium can be at low levels in the solution (0.1 mM or a few ppm) because these nutrients are in the plant, where we want them. Maintaining a high concentrations of nutrients in the solution can result in excessive uptake that can lead to nutrient imbalances.

For example, the water removed from solution through transpiration must be replaced and it is necessary to have about 0.5 mM phosphorous in the refill solution. If the refill solution was added once each day, the phosphorous would be absorbed by the plant in a few hours and the solution phosphorous concentration would be close to zero. This does not indicate a deficiency, rather it indicates a healthy plant with rapid nutrient uptake. If the phosphorous level is maintained at 0.5 mM in the recirculating solution, the phosphorous concentration in the plant can increase to 1% of the dry mass, which is 3 times higher than the optimum in most plants. This high phosphorous level can induce iron and zinc deficiency (Chaney and Coulombe, 1982).

Feeding plants in this way is like the daily feeding of a pet dog, some dogs would be far overweight if their food bowls were kept continuously full.
 

skunkushybrid01

Well-Known Member
Not a new discovery, i've been talking about this since september 2009...

Your paper is from 2003 and based on tests where nutrients are forced into plant cells in petri dishes. these results are wrong because the paknts were not tested in a live setting... this sort of shit is exactly a part of the basis for old skool teachings on nutrient take up. try finding something post 2009, of scientific value that says the same thing.

DR Salt even mentions specifically that some hydroponic corn had almost no suberin, and that mangroves living in salt water have extreme concentrations of suberin.
obvioulsy th emangroves in SALT WATER would have elevated levels of suberin. suberin blocks the passage of salts LOL. If a plant has a low amount of suberin potential then it will have a low salt tolerance.... FFS!
 

homebrewer

Well-Known Member
LOL.

this place has gone right down hill... or maybe just those with intell;igence and that know how to read properly are keeping out of it. I can't put this any clearer, even in salt's own words from 2009 this is not enough for you... here they are again. it says it all perfectly:

"Just like animals, plants want to select the things they take in," Salt said. "They want a certain amount of potassium or a certain amount of nitrogen. This allows them to choose how much they get."

can you read that? Just like animals, just like we choose what we eat and the amounts we choose to do so...


the difference here is that you fucking idiots just want to argue... how can you continue to argue when it makes perfect logical sense? I have grown plants in 4.0 in DWC, LOL... i have grown seedlings in a 3.2EC concentration... you dickheads are so ignorant you don't even deserve to hear the results. fucking morons.
It astounds me that you're drawing the conclusions that you are from that quote. Your quote and cited reference in no way indicates that ratios and feeding levels don't mean anything nor should any halfway intelligent person interpret them as meaning you cannot burn a plant. The 'info' you've posted on this site borders on trolling as this reminds me of our last conversation where you thought AK47 meant 'afghan kush, done in 47 days' and that cindy 99 was the 99th generation of cindy :lol:.


Quotes found here: https://www.rollitup.org/newbie-central/307962-produce-weed-43-days-93.html

AK47 stands for Afghan Kush 47, a double entendre in that it hits like a machine gun and can also be taken at 47 days. In fact i remember when serious were first talking about this strain and they wanted to distance themselves away from the kalshnikov, and even themselves said it was named so because it can be taken at just 47 days flower.
Serious Seeds stole the name... every European knows that AK stands for Afghan Kush and that it flowers in 47 days.
that's why they call it cinderella... but the 99 comes from the 99th generation. They noticed that with each generation the Cindy would just get stronger and stronger. It wasn't until C88 that the bro's finally felt they were getting the holy grail they were looking for. they hit it at 99
Here's a suggestion for you, stay in the newbie area because they're the only people on this site dumb enough to believe the drivel that spews from your keyboard.
 

skunkushybrid01

Well-Known Member
LOL...

AK47 does stand for being done in 47 days... You're just a noob that has no idea what Afgan Kush is really all about. yes i got confused on the breeding thing witht he C99...

can't we stick to one subject? it's like arguing with my gf. everywhere i go you're there determined to try and win an argument with me.... LOL. You actually go through old threads, as i haven't been here in months, you sad fuck. stick to the subject in hand.
 

skunkushybrid01

Well-Known Member
OK dickheads... from the .pdf i asked you to download and read.... from the introduction and very first sentence:
The plant root is a specialized organ that allows uptake of water
and selective uptake of solutes from the soil environment, to
support normal plant growth and development.
I've even emboldened the operative word for you.... it permeates throughout the whole paper. it's actually the sole basis of the paper. read it.... actually read it. LOL
 

burrr

Active Member
I too can cut and paste from that article.
Using this mutant, we were able to uncover the
importance of suberin in sealing connections between
root cells to regulate water movement through the plant
and accumulation of various essential and nonessential
minerals in leaves, including sodium, sulfur, potassium,
calcium, manganese, zinc, arsenic, selenium, and molybdenum.


Bullet point of this presentation: nitrogen and phosphorus did not make the list of filtered elements.
These articles just explain the role of suberin, it never says that having some suberin will make them nute proof!

Here, we present
direct genetic evidence establishing that suberin in the roots plays a critical role in controlling both water and mineral ion
uptake and transport to the leaves.
 

skunkushybrid01

Well-Known Member
I too can cut and paste from that article.
Using this mutant, we were able to uncover the
importance of suberin in sealing connections between
root cells to regulate water movement through the plant
and accumulation of various essential and nonessential
minerals in leaves, including sodium, sulfur, potassium,
calcium, manganese, zinc, arsenic, selenium, and molybdenum.


Bullet point of this presentation: nitrogen and phosphorus did not make the list of filtered elements.
These articles just explain the role of suberin, it never says that having some suberin will make them nute proof!

Here, we present
direct genetic evidence establishing that suberin in the roots plays a critical role in controlling both water and mineral ion
uptake and transport to the leaves.


Those quotes only prove my point.... do you miss words deliberately?

Using this mutant, we were able to uncover the importance of suberin in sealing connections between root cells to regulate water movement through the plant and accumulation of various essential and nonessential minerals in leaves, including sodium, sulfur, potassium, calcium, manganese, zinc, arsenic, selenium, and molybdenum.

It is all nutrients, it simply depends upon the consistency of the suberin.
 
Top