Avoiding the question

N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
You have said as such.
Click to expand...
He has never said that London, you are being disingenuous. Rob has clearly stated on numerous occasions that government should not impose force on association. Why are you misunderstanding the argument?

Let me ask you a Question: Do you oppose government (local, state and federal) imprisoning blacks 5 times more often than whites?
 
sheskunk

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
your stance supports these actions. You feel if a person owns a business he should be allowed to pick and chose who he wishes to serve, even if the business is open to the public. You have said as such. Why would you support someone kicking out a paying customer due to the color of skin.
Click to expand...

Do you support gay rights? If so, would that make you yourself gay?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
He has never said that London, you are being disingenuous. Rob has clearly stated on numerous occasions that government should not impose force on association. Why are you misunderstanding the argument?

Let me ask you a Question: Do you oppose government (local, state and federal) imprisoning blacks 5 times more often than whites?
Click to expand...
so why do you support making it legal to kick people out of stores based solely on their skin color?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
so why do you support making it legal to kick people out of stores based solely on their skin color?
Click to expand...
Why do you support making it legal to force people to serve others ? That seems awfully similar to the same tactics used by prohibitionists and slave owners.

You fail to discuss that you advocate forced human relations and that I do not.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
was anyone ever forced to open a public store rather than a private store?

you always avoid that one.
Click to expand...
No, I've answered it.

The answer is yes. People are forced to have both. The existence of a coercive authority that sets and (re)defines what private property is from the very onset is self evident.

I'm sorry that your comprehension skills are lacking and you fail to see the gun in the room.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
your stance supports these actions. You feel if a person owns a business he should be allowed to pick and chose who he wishes to serve, even if the business is open to the public. You have said as such. Why would you support someone kicking out a paying customer due to the color of skin.
Click to expand...
You presented two different ideas above and combined them into one. One I can endorse, the other (racial discrimination) I don't endorse, but I have no right to make the other person do anything different as their actions are confined to their own body and their own property.

A person can believe you have a right to chose your own interactions on a consensual basis and control their own property. That is one thing.

What a person does with their property in the sense of who they invite to use it or who they seek relations with, is another thing.


My mom thinks I have the right to smoke weed, because she knows I own my body. She doesn't mean she wants me to smoke weed or that she does. A lady in her 80s can figure it out....you can't. Very telling.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Watch as the scarey dude from Colorado tries to hurt my feels with every post I make, he's got a huge man crush on me.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
then name one person who has been forced to open a public store rather than a private one.

name the store and its location.

thanks, spaMBLA.
Click to expand...
Wendy's, 4th stall on the left in the mens room. Force was definitely involved. Some poor fucker had to clean that shit up, can you believe it?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
nope, no wendy's store has been forced to be a public store rather than a private one.

try again, spaMBLA.
Click to expand...

Silly you. The fact that your government has defined Wendy's must be one or the other is self evident that force is involved. You might recall that your government doesn't ask politely, they back up all their "suggestions" with a threat of force for noncompliance.

So, Mr. Poopy Pants you see, force is involved, it's very evident, if you lift your eyes from those boots you are licking you might even see it.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Silly you. The fact that your government has defined Wendy's must be one or the other is self evident that force is involved. You might recall that your government doesn't ask politely, they back up all their "suggestions" with a threat of force for noncompliance.

So, Mr. Poopy Pants you see, force is involved, it's very evident, if you lift your eyes from those boots you are licking you might even see it.
Click to expand...
again, you did not answer the question.

name one person who has been forced to open a public store rather than a private one.

name the store and its location.

thanks, spaMBLA.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
I can name one:

Comcast Corporation
Comcast Center
1701 JFK Boulevard
Philadelphia, PA 19103

Used to be a private business, now it's a public utility.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top