Alcohol ‘directly causes’ seven forms of cancer, new study warns

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member



Alcohol consumption increases the risk of some cancers, says a new report and now Cancer Care Ontario says it needs to do more to educate the public. Crystal Goomansingh reports.




Alcohol ‘directly causes’ seven forms of cancer, scientists out of New Zealand are warning in a new study that suggests drinking even low to moderate amounts is risky.

The medical community often talks about a “link” between cancer and drinking – this is a major upgrade linking the two.

“An association means there is a relationship of some kind between the two variables. A causal association means there is evidence that alcohol consumption directly causes cancer,” the researchers, out of Otago University in New Zealand, explain.

“There is strong evidence that alcohol causes cancer at seven sites in the body and probably others,” they wrote in their study, published Friday in the journal Addiction.

READ MORE: A daily glass of wine? Canadian study says it’s good to be true

The more you drink, the more your risk increases, they warn.

“For all these there is a dose-response relationship.” They say there isn’t a safe level of drinking either: “a considerable burden is experienced by drinkers with low to moderate consumption.”

The seven cancers tied to booze, according to the study, are:

  • Liver
  • Colon
  • Rectum
  • Breast
  • Larynx
  • Esophagus
  • Oropharynx
The study also points to growing evidence that alcohol could cause:

  • Skin
  • Prostate
  • Pancreatic cancer
The study was led by Dr. Jennie Connor and is based on a review of major research and meta-analyses that zeroed in on alcohol and cancer. Some of the research came out of the World Cancer Research Fund, the American Institute for Cancer Research, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (the IARC already classifies alcohol as ‘carcinogenic to humans).

READ MORE: Alcohol often an overlooked cancer risk, Cancer Care report warns

Connor and her team learned that many of these studies found a link. How strong the ties were depended on the cancer, too: mouth, pharynx and esophagus were most affected.

For these cancers, there is a “well-recognized interaction” of alcohol with smoking, multiplying risk, they explained.

They say, overall, 5.8 per cent of all cancers can be attributed to alcohol.

If consumers quit drinking, the causal association tapers out, which props up their findings, the researchers say.

Those who give up on booze could even end up with the same risk levels as “never drinkers” after 20 years.

“This raises the question of why alcohol affects some cancers and not others, and whether this undermines the conclusion that ‘alcohol causes cancer,’” they concede.

READ MORE: Online alcohol calculator shows just how much you’re drinking

But they say the mechanisms behind why alcohol causes cancer is “not well understood” for now.

The Distilled Spirits Council disagreed with the findings, though.

“To declare that alcohol definitively causes cancer based upon cherry-picked epidemiology articles lacks scientific credibility,” Dr. Sam Zakhari, senior vice president of scientific affairs at the organization, said in a statement.

“Based on my own 40-year career as a biomedical scientist,…the science regarding cancer and alcohol consumption is far from settled. In fact, the existing epidemiological studies do not demonstrate causation, nor do they account for the multitude of contributing factors,” he said.

In 2014, Cancer Care Ontario warned that alcohol is an overlooked risk factor for cancer, just like smoking, tanning or an unhealthy diet.

“Alcohol drinking has been normalized in our society and so much so that we don’t think of it as a risk factor for chronic diseases, especially cancer,” Dr. Linda Rabeneck, CCO’s vice-president of prevention and cancer control, said.

“This is an opportunity to show that it’s a modifiable risk factor and there are people who are diagnosed with cancers that we can relate to alcohol,” she told Global News.

Read Connor’s full findings here.

[email protected]
 

Indacouch

Well-Known Member
If this is the least bit true my uncle is the luckiest guy I know ....I'm talking brandy in his corn flakes bad ....worthless as all hell but not a lick of cancer ...
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
View attachment 3738967 Looks like booze needs some warning labels, maybe some child proof packaging, ect, ect... HC will get right on it - protect the children.... (please insert sound of crickets.....) :spew:
Plain packaging...and only sold by mail order. And for gods' sake get those wine and beer brewing kits the hell out of grocery stores, little Johnny doesn't need to be exposed to that when he's buying his Fruit Loops! Think of the horrific outcome if a parent were to brew a batch of beer while children are present.
 
Top