6 On 6 Off 6 On 6 Off Lighting Schedule, Ever Tried?

sogalax

Well-Known Member
Its ben dun and it worked, I think the thread had time machien in the title,can't remember the posters name, he had a avatar from the movie stepbothers


Well in checked I was wrong and I can't spell,anywhoo it was 6/12,time machine
 

tstick

Well-Known Member
I am a strict convert for the Gas Lantern Lighting Technique now that I've tried it on my last three runs. The schedule is as follows:

12 ON

5.5 OFF

1 ON

5.5 OFF

repeat

This makes it possible to keep the plants in vegetative growth while providing only 13 total hours ON -as opposed to running the traditional 18/6 schedule. I have found no appreciable difference for vegetative growth.

Then, when it comes to flipping to flower, I just remove that 1-hour ON period.

There is also something called the Diminishing Light Schedule, too...Basically, when you flip to flower, you run a couple weeks of 12/12, then you start to add an extra hour of darkness over a period of time, until you end up at something like 9 hours ON right before harvest. I have not tried this technique....yet.
 

Billy the Mountain

Well-Known Member
This makes it possible to keep the plants in vegetative growth while providing only 13 total hours ON -as opposed to running the traditional 18/6 schedule. I have found no appreciable difference for vegetative growth.
...
You may not notice it, but they'll certainly grow slower getting 28% less light
That could be a positive, depending on your objectives
 

tstick

Well-Known Member
You may not notice it, but they'll certainly grow slower getting 28% less light
That could be a positive, depending on your objectives
Yes, they may be getting 28% less light, but the results speak for themselves at the end. I thought the same thing....less light = less photosynthesis = slower growth. However, after using this technique, I get equivalent results at harvest. Keep in mind, the flower cycle is the same. Honestly, I've found that when I flip to flower by removing that 1-hour ON, the plants seem to really accelerate into the flowering mode. I have read that the Gas Lantern Technique may possibly increase the flowering hormones by keeping them right on the edge of flowering. and then, when the flip is made, they just start dumping that hormone like crazy. I don't know for sure, but, experience has always been my best teacher and this technique ended up being a keeper for me.
 

medman111

Member
About 20 years ago there was a high times mag where people where doing 6 on 12 off, the yields were less per cycle but annually were greater than normal. The flower cycle time was greatly reduced .
 

bk78

Well-Known Member
Hey!!! This us awesome. It's similar to something I invented called "The Devil's Light Cycle" its 6hrs:ON. 2hrs:OFF. 6hrs:ON. 2hrs:OFF. 6hrs:ON. 2hrs:OFF. For a total 18hrs of light and 6hrs darkness within a 24hr period. This causes a marked increase in vegative growth.
Are you that Joe Petrie hack?
 

growdoe420

New Member
Love how nobody has tried it but know all about it...smh...know it alls....can't stand them
Oh I definitely tried it but my version is 6hrs on / 2hrs off. 6hrs on / 2hrs off. Etc etc, and I have noticed increase in vegative growth. But it's nothing compared to the 12hrs on /5hrs off. 2hrs on /5hrs off, for veg growth.Then use as little as 8hrs on and 16hrs off for flower and see a harvest in about 20percent less time. Not to mention that the oil production is much higher due to the extra 4hrs of night time, bc a lot of the oil and phytochromes are produced at night. Not during photosynthesis. Also there's an advantage to be spoken of in the plants themselves having much lower levels of stress due to the more natural light cycle. Nowhere on this planet can you find 16 to 18hrs of direct sunlight, thus no plant that evolved here will have the million year old genetic code, which finds such long hours condusive. In fact they're more likely to be highly stressed and exhausted from being over worked. This method uses 20% less time and 20% less energy, not to mention it gives you a little stealthiness when it comes to the Electric company who are looking for a certain 12 on 12 off pattern in energy usage.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
Oh I definitely tried it but my version is 6hrs on / 2hrs off. 6hrs on / 2hrs off. Etc etc, and I have noticed increase in vegative growth. But it's nothing compared to the 12hrs on /5hrs off. 2hrs on /5hrs off, for veg growth.Then use as little as 8hrs on and 16hrs off for flower and see a harvest in about 20percent less time. Not to mention that the oil production is much higher due to the extra 4hrs of night time, bc a lot of the oil and phytochromes are produced at night. Not during photosynthesis. Also there's an advantage to be spoken of in the plants themselves having much lower levels of stress due to the more natural light cycle. Nowhere on this planet can you find 16 to 18hrs of direct sunlight, thus no plant that evolved here will have the million year old genetic code, which finds such long hours condusive. In fact they're more likely to be highly stressed and exhausted from being over worked. This method uses 20% less time and 20% less energy, not to mention it gives you a little stealthiness when it comes to the Electric company who are looking for a certain 12 on 12 off pattern in energy usage.
Try googling circadian rhythm.
 

Billy the Mountain

Well-Known Member
Oh I definitely tried it but my version is 6hrs on / 2hrs off. 6hrs on / 2hrs off. Etc etc, and I have noticed increase in vegative growth. But it's nothing compared to the 12hrs on /5hrs off. 2hrs on /5hrs off, for veg growth.Then use as little as 8hrs on and 16hrs off for flower and see a harvest in about 20percent less time. Not to mention that the oil production is much higher due to the extra 4hrs of night time, bc a lot of the oil and phytochromes are produced at night. Not during photosynthesis. Also there's an advantage to be spoken of in the plants themselves having much lower levels of stress due to the more natural light cycle. Nowhere on this planet can you find 16 to 18hrs of direct sunlight, thus no plant that evolved here will have the million year old genetic code, which finds such long hours condusive. In fact they're more likely to be highly stressed and exhausted from being over worked. This method uses 20% less time and 20% less energy, not to mention it gives you a little stealthiness when it comes to the Electric company who are looking for a certain 12 on 12 off pattern in energy usage.
You should ditch the foil hat and learn at least a little something about basic plant science.
 

medman111

Member
Its easy to let one or two anecdotal experiences become truth, Im guessing hes confusing stretch for growth. Hey as long as hes happy and hes got smoke he enjoys then god speed.
 

Amaximus

Well-Known Member
Has anyone ever read, heard of or seen anything about this. Any thoughts or opinions on it?

6 hours on then 6 off, then 6 on then 6 off in a 24 hour day mimicking hopefully 2 days. What would it achieve? Maybe flower quicker..?! Would they hermie? Would it confuse them so much that they stay in veg or would it initiate the onset of flowering much quicker??

What do ya reckon????
Whatever happened to newworldicon? That guy what such a fucking imbecile.

It's a shame the admins removed the newworldicon holocaust quote from my signature. It was amazing.
 
Top