20 states & Obamacare!

doublejj · Nov 17, 2012

As of today 20 states are refusing to set-up the required provisions of Obamacare. What are they thinking? The Fed's will do it for them & only cost them Federal money's.
Those states that had started working on healthcare-exchanges as soon as Obamacare passed, have arranged deals much cheaper than the 'one-size-fits-all' Fed plan. :wall:

Also, by making it so 'all alike' from the start only, paves the way for 'Universal Health Care' down the road. They just made it 20 times easier!.lol! ;-)

sync0s · Nov 17, 2012

They're thinking: "Why did we ever go along with the 17th amendment?" You know, the same question that Colorado and Washington will be asking themselves shortly.

Mr Neutron · Nov 17, 2012

Sounds like 20 states full of terrorists. Better drone the shit out of them before the sentiment spreads.

Fungus Gnat · Nov 17, 2012

The feds should setup singlepayer systems in those states for the LOL's.

nitro harley · Nov 17, 2012

doublejj said:
As of today 20 states are refusing to set-up the required provisions of Obamacare. What are they thinking? The Fed's will do it for them & only cost them Federal money's.
Those states that had started working on healthcare-exchanges as soon as Obamacare passed, have arranged deals much cheaper than the 'one-size-fits-all' Fed plan.

Also, by making it so 'all alike' from the start only, paves the way for 'Universal Health Care' down the road. They just made it 20 times easier!.lol!

I like the words "cheaper....and...healthcare"..in the same sentence.....I can't wait ...I hope it is true.....right now my health care is not cheap......It is just under 600.00 per month.....and I had to get that through the state.......hopefully I don't find out later on that what I do have is cheap................nitro..

HotCheetos · Nov 17, 2012

Maybe if the legislation wasn't a complete cipher about the laws and requirements and just what exactly an "exchange" would be the states would go along with it? I can't blame governments for not blindly signing off on something that is not written down yet.

ChesusRice · Nov 18, 2012

HotCheetos said:
Maybe if the legislation wasn't a complete cipher about the laws and requirements and just what exactly an "exchange" would be the states would go along with it? I can't blame governments for not blindly signing off on something that is not written down yet.

Written out and clearly defined
http://www.healthcare.gov/law/features/choices/exchanges/index.html

Mr Neutron · Nov 19, 2012

If the federal government can take away your property without consent and then make you buy something under penalty of a tax... the "land of the free and home of the brave" is gone.

20 states & Obamacare!

doublejj

Well-Known Member

sync0s

Well-Known Member

Mr Neutron

Well-Known Member

Fungus Gnat

Well-Known Member

nitro harley

Well-Known Member

HotCheetos

Well-Known Member

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member

Mr Neutron

Well-Known Member

Similar threads