White people, particularly men:

UncleBuck said:

and all you had to do was put people through actual slavery, instead of normal taxpaying jobs like americans now do.

it was so racist against whites for us yanks to free those slaves of yours. you must feel so persecuted.

Click to expand...

Keeping people from seceding is always wrong.

All people should be free to chose their associations. Abraham Lincoln, the racist bigot didn't think that was a good thing though did he?

Courageous slaves "seceded" from situations where they were not able to self determine. That is a good thing.

It seems alot of irony goes right over your (meat) head, when on one hand you support the freedom of some people, but champion the force used by the Union to hold other people in an association they clearly wanted to end.

Poor oppressed Robroy is a slave who is being raped because government forces him to sell things to paying customers who enter his business in public.

Segregation is really freedom.

abandonconflict said:

Poor oppressed Robroy is a slave who is being raped because government forces him to sell things to paying customers who enter his business in public.

Segregation is really freedom.

Click to expand...

Should black shop owners have a right to refuse service to a skin head?

Harrekin said:

Should black shop owners have a right to refuse service to a skin head?

Click to expand...

Should my aunt be referred to as my uncle if she has balls?

Rob Roy said:

Keeping people from seceding is always wrong.

All people should be free to chose their associations. Abraham Lincoln, the racist bigot didn't think that was a good thing though did he?

Click to expand...

i can literally go to any white supremacy website and find people spewing the same rhetoric as you nearly verbatim.

you are aware that the very first reason they cited for seceding was so that they could continue the institution of slavery, right?

good job on endorsing the enslavement of blacks, spaMBLA.

Harrekin said:

Should black shop owners have a right to refuse service to a skin head?

Click to expand...

being a white supremacist is a choice.

having a certain skin color is not.

but eloquent defense of the racists, tiny dancer.

4'11''.

abandonconflict said:

Should my aunt be referred to as my uncle if she has balls?

Click to expand...

I suppose that would depend on how your aunt self identifies, it's really none of my business how he/she/they live their life.

Now, given weve determined a white person shouldn't discriminate against others in their shop, should Jewish people be allowed refuse service to a person with a Hitler-esque mustache?

Harrekin said:

should Jewish people be allowed refuse service to a person with a Hitler-esque mustache?

Click to expand...

people have 100% full control over their facial hair, short stuff.

no one has control over what skin color they are born with.

once again, eloquent defense of racism, tiny dancer.

4'11''.

Rob Roy said:

Keeping people from seceding is always wrong.

All people should be free to chose their associations. Abraham Lincoln, the racist bigot didn't think that was a good thing though did he?

Courageous slaves "seceded" from situations where they were not able to self determine. That is a good thing.

It seems alot of irony goes right over your (meat) head, when on one hand you support the freedom of some people, but champion the force used by the Union to hold other people in an association they clearly wanted to end.

Click to expand...

Southern states wanted to seceded in order to expand slavery, is that a good thing ?

londonfog said:

Southern states wanted to secede in order to expand slavery, is that a good thing ?

Click to expand...

in 1860, the south was responsible for 75% of all US exports. Its no wonder they didn't want that to end. Hard to let go of something that had been practiced the previous 6,000 years.

You made a career out of assisting others in the murder of people? Is THAT a good thing?

londonfog said:

Southern states wanted to seceded in order to expand slavery, is that a good thing ?

Click to expand...

Oh yeah, the Southern Democrats, right?

abandonconflict said:

Poor oppressed Robroy is a slave who is being raped because government forces him to sell things to paying customers who enter his business in public.

Segregation is really freedom.

Click to expand...

Nice try. Except, you failed to address what I've said and you've erroneously tried to re-frame my position, again. You do that a lot when you are unable to refute a point. Maybe you'll grow out of it, maybe not.

Forced integration is NOT freedom is it? No, it isn't.

Human beings shouldn't be forced to segregate or integrate by other people. The individuals involved can and should make those choices.

You advocate forcing people into relationships, I do not. Can you refute that, I don't think you can

londonfog said:

Southern states wanted to seceded in order to expand slavery, is that a good thing ?

Click to expand...

Expanding slavery is a horrible idea. I am an abolitionist and think human slavery needs to be abolished, don't you?

If a person or state wanted to secede for other reasons and they were forcibly prevented from leaving, how is that not like enslaving the person that wished to leave?

In other words if you are held in an association you don't want to be in by force we agree that is wrong, correct?

UncleBuck said:

people have 100% full control over their facial hair, short stuff.

no one has control over what skin color they are born with.

once again, eloquent defense of racism, tiny dancer.

4'11''.

Click to expand...

Should people be made to serve or associate with others under threat of force?



I bet you won't answer that question.

Rob Roy said:

Forced integration

Click to expand...

Who is forced to have their private clubs made into advertised businesses with their wares available to the public?

abandonconflict said:

Who is forced to have their private clubs made into advertised businesses with their wares available to the public?

Click to expand...

The fact a person must make a declaration of private property into one of two classes that a third party has decided exist is self evidence that force is present.

abandonconflict said:

Should my aunt be referred to as my uncle if she has balls?

Click to expand...

How thick is her mustache?

Rob Roy said:

The fact a person must make a declaration of private property into one of two classes that a third party has decided exist is self evidence that force is present.

Click to expand...

Property rights come from government and are only made possible by force in the first place. To hide behind this in order to discriminate is not to remain neutral as you say but relies on force.

Inb4 pedophilia is described as consensual.

abandonconflict said:

Property rights come from government and are only made possible by force in the first place. To hide behind this in order to discriminate is not to remain neutral as you say but relies on force.

Inb4 pedophilia is described as consensual.

Click to expand...

Aren't you in some exotic foreign country? Why are you even here? Shouldn't you be training people to dive. Your lies are so transparent. Show me that plane ticket. lol

abandonconflict said:

Property rights come from government and are only made possible by force in the first place. To hide behind this in order to discriminate is not to remain neutral as you say but relies on force.

Inb4 pedophilia is described as consensual.

Click to expand...

What is property and who can own it?