New activist funding plan.

GregS

Well-Known Member
These are my recent thoughts on protecting ourselves as best we can under the law while finding the resources to advocate on our own behalf. There is a lot to it, and I wonder how best to do this. There are documents and plenty of ideas that necessarily depend on each other.


The basic premise is that we have seen graphically over the last week the failings of sec. 4, and that consensus is growing that sec. 8 is the only real protection we have. I have tried twice to discuss sec. 8 provisions and its authority on the MMMA forums recently, and another member started another thread that went on for a good dozen pages, only to have several dozen pages of text and a few hundred posts censored. The management t here does not even permit the topic.


I have devised a patient/caregiver agreement that any patient, by token of registry or in that they have had a doctor state that medical use can help, can enter into with any person, with or without registry, who they care to designate as their caregiver as long as that person meets requirements (not a drug felon, over 21, &c). There are also supporting documents that are a part of that. I have lawyers looking at everything and am anxious to find whether this has a good chance help people avoid conviction under sec. 8 in that it is intended to prove that a physician has stated..., and that the patient and caregiver are engaged in medical use to treat or alleviate the patients condition. Those are two of the three elements necessary to succeed in a sec. 8 action. All that would remain is to ensure that reasonable quantities are involved, and are no more than necessary to ensure an uninterrupted supply.


This is the contract:

Patient/Caregiver Agreement to Engage in the Medical Use of Marijuana

I,______________________________________, swear and affirm that I am a patient under the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act, Initiated Law 1 of 2008.

__
Dr._____________________________, a physician authorized under Part 170 of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.17001 to 333.17084, or an osteopathic physician under Part 175 of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.17501 to 333.17556, license I.D. number____________________, and dated___________________________has stated that in the physician's professional opinion, and after having completed a full assessment of the patient's medical history and current medical condition made in the course of a bona fide physician-patient relationship, that I am likely to receive therapeutic or palliative benefit from the medical use of marihuana to treat or alleviate the debilitating medical condition or symptoms associated with the debilitating medical condition (copy attached) .

or:

__A registry card
duly issued by the State of Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) , number______________________(copy attached), has been issued to me which attests to a physician's recommendation that in the physician's professional opinion, and after having completed a full assessment of my medical history and current medical condition made in the course of a bona fide physician-patient relationship, I am likely to receive therapeutic or palliative benefit from the medical use of marihuana to treat or alleviate the debilitating medical condition or symptoms associated with the debilitating medical condition.

I hereby designate_______________________________ as my caregiver under that law, and agree to conform with the Act in the medical use of marijuana.

I,______________________________________, swear and affirm that I am at least 21 years of age and have agreed to assist with the above named patient's medical use of marijuana. I have not been convicted of any felony within the past 10 years and have never been convicted of a felony involving illegal drugs or a felony that is an assaultive crime as defined in section 9a of chapter X of the code of criminal procedure, 1927 PA 175, MCL 770.9a.

Signed this date:____________________________

Patient sign here:_____________________________

Signed this date:___________________________


Caregiver sign here:________________________________

/s/_________________________________

Print Notary Name:_____________________________________

Notary public, State of Michigan, County of _____________________.

My commission expires: __________________.

Acting in the County of ___________________.


Supporting documents are here: https://sites.google...attredirects=0, and here
https://sites.google...?attredirects=0

I have been to the Genessee County Club. It operates as a farmers' market. I understand Joe Cain continues to operate the same way Anyone with a card is permitted to rent vendor space and sell to anyone with a card regardless of registry connection. Those people are not protected by the law in any way and can be put in prison. I am proposing that the agreement mentioned above be offered to vendors in garden markets to establish a pt/caregiver relationship between any patient and any qualified person as their caregiver in order to offer the caregiver sec. 8 protection. Under these provisions, sec. 8 permits any patient to have any number of caregivers, and any caregiver to have any number of patients. The agreements will be required to be notarized with the necessary supporting documents attached.

Farmers' markets have been successful, and I am unaware that anyone has ever been arrested for participating as a caregiver without benefit of registry affiliation there. If anyone is aware of any, please speak now. Nonetheless there is cause for concern that the police will at some point enforce that.


This is where I think it gets interesting. If we were to operate farmers' markets and permit vendors just as are already allowed, we would offer these contracts for use by vendors to find protection under the AD. A premium in the form of a legal defense can, I think, be offered for a price; I'm thinking maybe a couple of hundred dollars a year. That money would go toward defending any cases that arise from this as long as the party has paid and entered into the plan, protecting those patients and caregivers, and dismissal is required as long as the parties do not have an unreasonable amount between them. If enough money can be generated, it can be used for other initiatives, for instance taking LARA to court over the recent changes. We are also serious in pitching in on an appeal for Carruthers in that dogshit decision. It would remain to be seen whether vendors would see the value in having a ready defense if they need one, and those payments can be considered contributions toward our activist objectives.


Money to operate these farm markets would come from vendor rents and any other other income stream the proprietor would devise. I would expect to hire and pay a staff. A notary would be on hand while the market is open. Commissions are easy and cheap to come by.


I am seeking comment from people I respect. Times are getting desperate, and desperate measures are arguably required. That said, sec. 8 has proven the one unassailable part of the law, and I think a viable way to take the fight to the government. I am ambivalent only in that something might go wrong and someone be convicted, and am trying to calculate that risk. I have taken this to a couple of attorneys, and they are too interested to dismiss the idea out of hand, but are being cagey as lawyers are wont to be. After five years, there has been no effective continuing participatory activism. To my thinking that is in large part because we have not had the money to do things right. This is the first idea I have come across that has the potential to do that. Lawyers, while they will be asked to perform some of their work in this regard pro bono,will nonetheless be compensated fairly, which cannot happen without an adequate treasury. People who travel to do our work would be paid expenses, putting boots on the ground where they are needed. There are any number of ways to get the bang for the buck.

In addition to this I would plan on every day, garden variety fund raising.

This is a departure from MMMA policy and would likely require a separate organization. Because of their aversion to all things section 8, and their vehemence in arguing against it, there are differences too deep to permit anything else.
 

Dr. Bob

Well-Known Member
So now the truth comes out. A scheme not to protect patients, but to line your own pockets.

The truth will set you free. At least you are showing your true colors and motivations, I hope the patients and caregivers see this clearly before they risk jail on your 'affidavit' section 8 defense.

Dr. Bob
 

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
So now the truth comes out. A scheme not to protect patients, but to line your own pockets.

The truth will set you free. At least you are showing your true colors and motivations, I hope the patients and caregivers see this clearly before they risk jail on your 'affidavit' section 8 defense.

Dr. Bob
That's a pretty bold accusation Bob. I don't know Greg other than what he's posted on here, but he doesn't strike me as the type that would knowingly send people to prison just to make a buck.

As far as Greg's section 8 concept goes, I will give it a look with an open mind. The protections we thought we had are being stripped away, so I tip my hat to him for at least spending the time to come up with alternatives.
 

VaporTrail

Active Member
Whats wrong Doc worried that silver spoon you've been eating with wouldnt be so silver anymore?. Greg sure seems like he truly cares about patients and caregivers. You on the other hand are a money grubbing Whore.:peace:
 

Dr. Bob

Well-Known Member
That's a pretty bold accusation Bob. I don't know Greg other than what he's posted on here, but he doesn't strike me as the type that would knowingly send people to prison just to make a buck.

As far as Greg's section 8 concept goes, I will give it a look with an open mind. The protections we thought we had are being stripped away, so I tip my hat to him for at least spending the time to come up with alternatives.
I stand by what I said. All this section 8 talk (over the objections of people that actually work with section 8 and the courts) was just a smoke screen to set up a farmers market. I bet he isn't going to be one of the vendors arrested for selling to non-registry connected patients.

Then don't always charge the owners. They charge the counter people that actually handle the cannabis. Right or wrong, they are the ones going through the court system.
 

buckaroo bonzai

Well-Known Member
As far as Greg's section 8 concept goes, I will give it a look with an open mind..

sec 8 is the only thing we really have for protections......mercy of the court and you have to ""prove"" your case

same thing we had before there was an mmj law-

only now they call it sec8--

.....the lawyers pulling everyone around by their dicks on roller skates helped design this perfectly for themselves at our expense

i mean what did we have before the [fake]law....??

sec8 means if you have a 'card' you can now purchase your legal defense at a 'semi' discount[not]...from the lawyers who designed this under the new mmj law that is really an illusion if you think you have protections from prosecution from a little plastic 100$ card-


any push back now is a day late and a dollar short of what we really needed to protect the law we voted for-

do you know how hard it is to change a law once its 'codified'...??

we would be better as a community to start over with a new constitutional ammendment law--
and not complete legalization that would help lawyers corporations and dispensaries distribution folks more than the little guy[us]

again the ONLY thing the corporations need to have access to the markets is for us to legalize it then they will have a mandate to change the rules and give them all the benefits

they have hundreds of mmj products ready to market that they have spent millions$$developing....how do you think the basement growers will stand up to that??


decriminalization would be the best approach IMO ....with minimal fines and civil infraction tickets

of course if you want to be a big player you could still take your chances it would just be easier and not as dangerous if everyone had 'some' rights and protections as far as mmj is concerned.....


it would be nice to see an 800lb go-rilla in the legislature wrestling with them

mayb we could call it the '800lb go-rilla' effort-
 

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
sec 8 is the only thing we really have for protections......mercy of the court and you have to ""prove"" your case

same thing we had before there was an mmj law-

only now they call it sec8--

.....the lawyers pulling everyone around by their dicks on roller skates helped design this perfectly for themselves at our expense

i mean what did we have before the [fake]law....??

sec8 means if you have a 'card' you can now purchase your legal defense at a 'semi' discount[not]...from the lawyers who designed this under the new mmj law that is really an illusion if you think you have protections from prosecution from a little plastic 100$ card-


any push back now is a day late and a dollar short of what we really needed to protect the law we voted for-

do you know how hard it is to change a law once its 'codified'...??

we would be better as a community to start over with a new constitutional ammendment law--
and not complete legalization that would help lawyers corporations and dispensaries distribution folks more than the little guy[us]

again the ONLY thing the corporations need to have access to the markets is for us to legalize it then they will have a mandate to change the rules and give them all the benefits

they have hundreds of mmj products ready to market that they have spent millions$$developing....how do you think the basement growers will stand up to that??


decriminalization would be the best approach IMO ....with minimal fines and civil infraction tickets

of course if you want to be a big player you could still take your chances it would just be easier and not as dangerous if everyone had 'some' rights and protections as far as mmj is concerned.....


it would be nice to see an 800lb go-rilla in the legislature wrestling with them

mayb we could call it the '800lb go-rilla' effort-

sec8 means if you have a 'card' you can now purchase your legal defense at a 'semi' discount[not]...from the lawyers who designed this under the new mmj law that is really an illusion if you think you have protections from prosecution from a little plastic 100$ card-


I regret signing up for my card. I feel like I'm past the point of no return now though. We're all on a list up in Lansing now, and dropping out of the program and continuing to grow seems like the worst of all possible scenarios to me.


decriminalization would be the best approach IMO ....with minimal fines and civil infraction tickets


100% agree with you here buck. I have nightmares about big pahrma/big tobacco/big business monopolizing this if it were 100% legal. The best case scenario to me would be a LEGIT medical program, and decriminalize possession for recreational use. Best of both worlds imo.
 

Cory and trevor

Well-Known Member
So now the truth comes out. A scheme not to protect patients, but to line your own pockets.

The truth will set you free. At least you are showing your true colors and motivations, I hope the patients and caregivers see this clearly before they risk jail on your 'affidavit' section 8 defense.

Dr. Bob
You are such a fucktard! your true colors are fucking yellow and pink.
 

Cory and trevor

Well-Known Member
GODDAMN IT BOB! I try and avoid you at all cost but you're always there. talking shit about helping patients but denying them access just like the court system, the law enforcement sector and our wonderful AG. You also have a tactless way of sounding like a 5th grade teaching taking somebody's yo-yo away in front of the class while you spout off your shitty opinions. they are opinions you present as fact and its insane. you do far more harm than good drop the ban hammer I'm on a nut; fuck bob. I wish to Christ we could meet unintentionally somewhere private.....for a conversation of course. face to face you'd never dare use the tone you pull off on here. so goddamn abrasive and with such an instigators flare for dramatic. FUCK YOU DUDE FOR REALS!
 

slumdog80

Well-Known Member
After making comments like that I have to agree with the consensus
here and tell you to go play Dr.

Greg comes off like a really good guy and in this for the right reasons.
I have always read all of his posts thoroughly, and learned a lot.

I am interested if I end up getting my card. I would absolutely donate money
if you were running the show regardless.
 

Cory and trevor

Well-Known Member
OH YEAH; Greg. Bob had me twisted up for a minute. Dude, I like the form, I think it looks great but I am no lawyer or court official. I'd use the thing and the farm market is the one model almost everyone seems to be behind. Access to meds that's what we are about. If Rick Simpson limited himself to 5 patients where would we be? The best need to be providing for the most possible. Anyone wanting to help would see it this way.
 

GregS

Well-Known Member
Another point in fact:

These contracts can be used between individuals, and are not required to only be available through the proposed garden markets. I would like to see markets operate on this fund raising model throughout the state.

And thanks everybody for the generous comments.
 

GregS

Well-Known Member
And participants to the agreement can have a plate of cookies AND a quart of marinara made with herb.
 

GregS

Well-Known Member
After making comments like that I have to agree with the consensus
here and tell you to go play Dr.

Greg comes off like a really good guy and in this for the right reasons.
I have always read all of his posts thoroughly, and learned a lot.

I am interested if I end up getting my card. I would absolutely donate money
if you were running the show regardless.
A card is not necessary sd. That said, I anticipate requiring any voting members in any organization that comes out of this to be a patient by token of a statement by a qualified physician that the individual meets the requirements of sec. 8.
 

buckaroo bonzai

Well-Known Member

sec8 means if you have a 'card' you can now purchase your legal defense at a 'semi' discount[not]...from the lawyers who designed this under the new mmj law that is really an illusion if you think you have protections from prosecution from a little plastic 100$ card-


I regret signing up for my card. I feel like I'm past the point of no return now though. We're all on a list up in Lansing now, and dropping out of the program and continuing to grow seems like the worst of all possible scenarios to me.


decriminalization would be the best approach IMO ....with minimal fines and civil infraction tickets


100% agree with you here buck. I have nightmares about big pahrma/big tobacco/big business monopolizing this if it were 100% legal. The best case scenario to me would be a LEGIT medical program, and decriminalize possession for recreational use. Best of both worlds imo.

the 'penial gland' regulates common sense and left/right brain function--

looks like yours is working fine stow--:mrgreen:

....and i guess your from canada so you can 'clearly' see what will happen if legalization efforts succeed here-
(somthing the lawyers here are foaming at the mouth for)

A card is not necessary sd..
finally some truth for the masses.....yeah a dr rec is all thats needed for a sec8 def-(not bob)

which is all we really have now anyway--
....just like before the law except with a couple mmj clauses thrown in-

you now have to prove your medical neccessity/needs in front of the magistrate and pray and hope you are not in oakland co or some other 'dumbfukistan' area where 63%voted yes but 0% are doing anything to protect what isnt left....

.(guilty until YOU can pay a lawyer$$$$$$and prove >>your innocence)

(i wonder if we could get a discussion going of this on other[3ma]websites...??)

oh thats right they have 'co-opted' the largest mmj sites here and are still spreading their rhetoric.....(lawyers/legs/steakholders)

all though if you want to keep signing up for the card it would be helpful in some cases (??) as 'stow' pointed out we are all allready on the lists--and dont forget they are using a percent of the $ to hire more LEO and keep us all in check in fear and confused-

3.5million went to new law enforcement and overtime for MSP-all from the mmj registry program$$$

anyone know about 'operation gardenplot--rex84'.....??

--the fema camp continuity of govt plan where they feel all the mmj people would give the govt the most trouble and dissent and have designs to 'pluck' mmj folks first and send them off to fema camps in case of mass civil uprisings.....??

--it all statred out of the civil disobedience from the 60/70s ....they are ready for it now-


imo opinion its time to start over-jm2c

we missed our 'protest' window and the folks helping with this dialectic did a fine job keeping that from happening and materializing.....(cpu)


i still think we should all get out our pitchforks and rakes and march on lansing--
 
Top