The Freedom To Be Fat..Does Government Have The Right To "Outlaw" Unhealthy Foods?

Doer

Well-Known Member
I have no reason to believe otherwise. You are fighting to accelerate the #1 cause of death in America. Heart Disease. Explain that.
He is not. But, he is protected by the 9th Amendment, to eat as he damn well please.

Just as we have the right to be disgusted about that.
 

burgertime2010

Well-Known Member
Plenty of foods are not legal for health concerns. So anti-health and anti-health care mentality both govern the thought process. The right to smoke cigs at 13 should apply, or take meds that have serious side effects, or hurt himself however. There are not choices for kids and the poor. If people want to eat shit.....so be it. But to call this responsible is bullshit. Govt allows people to spend tax dollars on fast food....I do not see the logic.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Let me just remind you guys that it wasn't too long ago that the government was encouraging us all to substitute margarine (transfats) for butter, now they want to ban transfats. They told me coffee was bad for me, then good for me, then bad, now good again I think, I have lost count.

I subscribe to the "nobody gets out alive" philosophy and refuse to let anybody dictate what I eat. Offer all the friendly advice you want but screw your demands.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
well, when one posts a false statement..you never know what schuylaar will do:mrgreen:
the Food Lion expose was NOT FRAUD, nor was it Libel. it was FACTUAL, and anyone who has ever worked in a grocery store knows it.

and here i am defending the Mainstream Press.

who would have thunk it?

truth is important, and even Frontline gets it right every now and then, purely by accident.

Frontline did not fabricate the Regional GM for Food Lion climbing into a dumpster to reclaim rotten discarded lettuce for sale, nor did they dub in somebody else's voice saying "peel off the black leaves and we can sell it" nor did they falsify the tapioca pudding debacle where the store training manager told the Undercover to "stir it up so the old stuff is mixed in" (the "old stuff" being ROTTEN AND MOULDY!)

a wall of copy/paste from an un-attributed source doesnt make the truth into a lie.
 

burgertime2010

Well-Known Member
Let me just remind you guys that it wasn't too long ago that the government was encouraging us all to substitute margarine (transfats) for butter, now they want to ban transfats. They told me coffee was bad for me, then good for me, then bad, now good again I think, I have lost count.

I subscribe to the "nobody gets out alive" philosophy and refuse to let anybody dictate what I eat. Offer all the friendly advice you want but screw your demands.
A lot of you have given up and that's fine. The right to eat crap, do drugs, and commit suicide I stand for. I believe in the right to ones own body.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Let me just remind you guys that it wasn't too long ago that the government was encouraging us all to substitute margarine (transfats) for butter, now they want to ban transfats. They told me coffee was bad for me, then good for me, then bad, now good again I think, I have lost count.

I subscribe to the "nobody gets out alive" philosophy and refuse to let anybody dictate what I eat. Offer all the friendly advice you want but screw your demands.
and no one wore hazmat suits in OR's or labs before 1984..the margarine?..i haven't seen that since low-sodium bread my grandma used to buy:spew:
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
the Food Lion expose was NOT FRAUD, nor was it Libel. it was FACTUAL, and anyone who has ever worked in a grocery store knows it.

and here i am defending the Mainstream Press.

who would have thunk it?

truth is important, and even Frontline gets it right every now and then, purely by accident.

Frontline did not fabricate the Regional GM for Food Lion climbing into a dumpster to reclaim rotten discarded lettuce for sale, nor did they dub in somebody else's voice saying "peel off the black leaves and we can sell it" nor did they falsify the tapioca pudding debacle where the store training manager told the Undercover to "stir it up so the old stuff is mixed in" (the "old stuff" being ROTTEN AND MOULDY!)

a wall of copy/paste from an un-attributed source doesnt make the truth into a lie.
how many grocery stores have employed you in the past and what was your title at those stores?
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Plenty of foods are not legal for health concerns. So anti-health and anti-health care mentality both govern the thought process. The right to smoke cigs at 13 should apply, or take meds that have serious side effects, or hurt himself however. There are not choices for kids and the poor. If people want to eat shit.....so be it. But to call this responsible is bullshit. Govt allows people to spend tax dollars on fast food....I do not see the logic.
But, it is so simple. There is no law about being reasonable or responsible outside the laws. Nor is there any need to explain ourselves to anyone.

You said responsible as a straw dog. Propose it as correct and judge the ones you think are not. The 9th A is quite specific.

We are not required to act or not in any way at all, according to your opinion. That is tyranny of opinion, in the rule of law.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
how many grocery stores have employed you in the past and what was your title at those stores?
i worked for 3 different grocery stores, and i was variously a stocker, bagboy, deli service, maintenance and cashier.

Food Lion's misdeeds were horrifying, but only unexpected in their order of magnitude, not their classification.

relabeling old shit with new expiration dates? yep, ordered to do so frequently
turning expired meat into "gourmet selections" by adding a shake of mesquite seasoning or adobo spice? yeah, common as dirt.
using produce which should be discarded in prepackaged salads? please. that was Day One.
improper storage of "product" in a manner which guarantees spoilage, then covering the spoilage with "marinades"? shit, i could tell you horror stories.

Food Lion just took it to revolting extremes.
 

burgertime2010

Well-Known Member
But, it is so simple. There is no law about being reasonable or responsible outside the laws. Nor is there any need to explain ourselves to anyone.

You said responsible as a straw dog. Propose it as correct and judge the ones you think are not. The 9th A is quite specific.

We are not required to act or not in any way at all, according to your opinion. That is tyranny of opinion, in the rule of law.
I know the law, I get it. Can't take people bitching about self-inflicted disease and others bitching about why costs might be high. I am just looking out for people and their wallets....I wont be paying in to O-care, so it is not my problem but it is for the greater good.....that is a fact.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
i worked for 3 different grocery stores, and i was variously a stocker, bagboy, deli service, maintenance and cashier.

Food Lion's misdeeds were horrifying, but only unexpected in their order of magnitude, not their classification.

relabeling old shit with new expiration dates? yep, ordered to do so frequently
turning expired meat into "gourmet selections" by adding a shake of mesquite seasoning or adobo spice? yeah, common as dirt.
using produce which should be discarded in prepackaged salads? please. that was Day One.
improper storage of "product" in a manner which guarantees spoilage, then covering the spoilage with "marinades"? shit, i could tell you horror stories.

Food Lion just took it to revolting extremes.
are you a writer ie; screen plays etc.?
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
I know the law, I get it. Can't take people bitching about self-inflicted disease and others bitching about why costs might be high. I am just looking out for people and their wallets....I wont be paying in to O-care, so it is not my problem but it is for the greater good.....that is a fact.
Perhaps it is for the greater good....or not. Just your opinion. I believe the 9th A. is far, far, the greater good. Whereas these ideas of FACT, are a clear erosion of those 9th A. personal liberties.

So, perhaps not a fact at all. Just opinion. Save of from the do-gooders. :)
 

burgertime2010

Well-Known Member
Perhaps it is for the greater good....or not. Just your opinion. I believe the 9th A. is far, far, the greater good. Whereas these ideas of FACT, are a clear erosion of those 9th A. personal liberties.

So, perhaps not a fact at all. Just opinion. Save of from the do-gooders. :)
Same logic as tobacco and alcohol, same health concerns......why are these products exempt. Or why cant kids smoke??? Just saying personal liberties in this area are eroded and its not different how? I believe in the 9th but you all are going to be paying for this and it's avoidable largely. I get lumped in with these irresponsible people, I try to warn them, and I am an asshole. So be it, at the very least I know not to stop caring.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
The freedom to associate or disassociate. The freedom to be left alone if you leave others alone. The freedom to ingest whatever I'd like. The freedom to travel unmolested.
The freedom to open a business and not be forced to seek permission. The freedom to have clean floors at Wendy's.
I once went to a Costco and there was a big turd on the floor in the restroom. It was the first time seeing such a thing. Disgusting! Maybe.. My god, it was probably Buck!
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Same logic as tobacco and alcohol, same health concerns......why are these products exempt. Or why cant kids smoke??? Just saying personal liberties in this area are eroded and its not different how? I believe in the 9th but you all are going to be paying for this and it's avoidable largely. I get lumped in with these irresponsible people, I try to warn them, and I am an asshole. So be it, at the very least I know not to stop caring.
Kids do smoke and drink. So I guess these laws don't work either. And I don't mind paying for freedom.

PS - I do not care one bit. Do-gooders bring in these laws that do no good.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
My Dad was just saying back in his day, any drunk was shunned. Drinking was considered a low life activity. But, they all smoked.

He stopped smoking and drinking on his own, but now drunks are a common fixture but smoking is way down.

DUI is only frowned upon. Blowing smoke can get you hurt.

Do-good laws, do not.
 

burgertime2010

Well-Known Member
Kids do smoke and drink. So I guess these laws don't work either. And I don't mind paying for freedom.

PS - I do not care one bit. Do-gooders bring in these laws that do no good.
But they do exist. At some level, the public realizes certain needs for change. This is just precedent. I am not asking you to care or give away anything, just talkin.
 

burgertime2010

Well-Known Member
My Dad was just saying back in his day, any drunk was shunned. Drinking was considered a low life activity. But, they all smoked.

He stopped smoking and drinking on his own, but now drunks are a common fixture but smoking is way down.

DUI is only frowned upon. Blowing smoke can get you hurt.

Do-good laws, do not.
I like beer and tobacco and don't use them much but I want that freedom and I like that there is an age restriction
 
Top