Full On Lagalization

stumpjumper

Well-Known Member
"Township Attorney Dennis McLain said the smell is so extreme that one neighbor has been physically sickened, it has disturbed neighbors’ sleep and prevented them from opening their windows on warm days over the summer."

What a crock of shit. How can someone become physically sick, and not be able to sleep from the smell of marijuana?
One work... AK47... shit stinks to high hell and has came real close to making me puke..
 

tricloud

New Member
I read the entire bill also but i did find a couple discrepancies. The main being that they want to keep track of how much weed the patients are purchasing and only allowing 2.5 oz's every 10 days. That's probably enough for most folks but it's not enough for everybody. I guess if you need Simpson oil etc you have to trust who makes it cause you won't be able to buy the material to make your own from a dispensary.

The other issue is that meds will need to be tested for various things. Not sure how that's going to work.

Other than that the bill doesn't look so bad.
 

Murfy

Well-Known Member
that restriction-

is only for provision centers. it exempts patients and caregiver transfer from the provision center regulations. this bill is a dream.
 

tricloud

New Member
that restriction-

is only for provision centers. it exempts patients and caregiver transfer from the provision center regulations. this bill is a dream.
I understand the intent but it's still going to be limiting to some people who really need more than 2.5 oz's every 10 days.
 

Timmahh

Well-Known Member
The MMM ACT is wrote in such a way, there is ZERO Time Definitions. They can NOT LIMIT one to any number of days, length of time, nor time limits. IT is NOT Authorized and SHOULD NOT be allowed to enter into law.......

the only Time that is Codified is "TIME OF INCIDENT Leading to ARREST". Leave it that way.
 

tomcatjones

Active Member
the allowance of local authorities and municipalities to regulate and impose fees ... will draw the line..

who is in and who is out. big money vs the little guys.


we passed this and a cottage industry arose.. are we going to let that die?


that is my largest beef..

as well as a few other things.. lack of support for pt rights.. where is this in it?

a) (1) Any criminal defendant who is eligible to use
marijuana pursuant to Section _____ may request that the court
confirm that he or she is allowed to use medical marijuana while he
or she is on probation or released on bail.
(2) The court's
decision and the reasons for the decision shall be stated on the
record and an entry stating those reasons shall be made in the
minutes of the court.
(3) During the period of probation or release on bail, if a
physician recommends that the probationer or defendant use medical
marijuana, the probationer or defendant may request a modification of
the conditions of probation or bail to authorize the use of medical
marijuana.
(4) The court's consideration of the modification request
authorized by this subdivision shall comply with the requirements of
this section.
(b) (1) Any person who is to be released on parole from a jail,
state prison, school, road camp, or other state or local institution
of confinement and who is eligible to use medical marijuana pursuant
to Section _________ may request that he or she be allowed to use
medical marijuana during the period he or she is released on parole.
A parolee's written conditions of parole shall reflect whether or
not a request for a modification of the conditions of his or her
parole to use medical marijuana was made, and whether the request was
granted or denied.
(2) During the period of the parole, where a physician recommends
that the parolee use medical marijuana, the parolee may request a
modification of the conditions of the parole to authorize the use of
medical marijuana.
(3) Any parolee whose request to use medical marijuana while on
parole was denied may pursue an administrative appeal of the
decision. Any decision on the appeal shall be in writing and shall
reflect the reasons for the decision.
(4) The administrative consideration of the modification request
authorized by this subdivision shall comply with the requirements of
this section.



that is from SB 420 in cali.. passed a DECADE ago. 2003....

why can't we pay attention and follow some thing like that?
 
Top