Is Obama more likely to start a war with Iran than Romney

[desert dude]

Personally, I don't want a war with Iran. If Obama is likely to start a war, that is a VERY good reason to not vote for him.


Chuck Schumer says that Obama is far more likely than Romney to attack Iran, in concert with Israel:


“He has made it clear that he will not support a nuclear Iran. He has made clear that the policy of containment is not a good policy. And I’ll tell you this on Iran, and I’ve said this to a couple of Romney supporters who agree, that if the sanctions fail, and military action is warranted, a re-elected President Obama is far more likely to launch that kind of military action, probably in concert with Israel, than would Mitt Romney. Because Mitt Romney will be new, he’ll have a whole domestic agenda.”


http://dailycaller.com/2012/09/12/schumer-a-re-elected-obama-far-more-likely-than-romney-to-launch-military-attack-on-iran/

 

[mr2shim]

Yes because democrats just love starting wars. History definitely is against them. When did opinions = fact? I must have missed that memo.

 

[UncleBuck]

OMFG.

did you miss romney's acceptance speech, DEAsert dude?

jesus fucking christ.

 

[mr2shim]

OMFG.

did you miss romney's acceptance speech, DEAsert dude?

jesus fucking christ.

Clearly did.

 

[Carne Seca]

Wait... what?

For the last three years all we've been hearing is how O'Bama is pro-Muslim (even accused of being a secret Muslim himself) and anti-Israel. Now he's going to side with Israel and attack a Muslim country?

 

[mr2shim]

Just for you desert dude

"Every American is less secure today because [President Barack Obama] has failed to slow Iran's nuclear threat," Romney said. "In his first TV interview as president, he said we should talk to Iran. We're still talking, and Iran's centrifuges are still spinning."

Romney campaign co-chair and former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty, known as a relative moderate, told Foreign Policy magazine this week that he would support Congress authorizing war with Iran.

http://ed.msnbc.com/_news/2012/08/31/13579195-did-mitt-romney-declare-war-on-iran?lite

 

[UncleBuck]

blustering and blundering.

 

[mr2shim]

Wait... what?

For the last three years all we've been hearing is how O'Bama is pro-Muslim (even accused of being a secret Muslim himself) and anti-Israel. Now he's going to side with Israel and attack a Muslim country?

Idiots will be idiots. Flip flop like a fish out of water. So long as their side is up.

 

[Samwell Seed Well]

thread fail. one star

 

[mr2shim]

thread fail. one star

I'm sure desert dude is thinking up some half witted attempt at being right.

 

[UncleBuck]

I'm sure desert dude is thinking up some half witted attempt at being right.

he'll point out that his pet dog thinks it's more likely under obama, thus convincing his self righteous ass that he is right.

 

[Carne Seca]

Idiots will be idiots. Flip flop like a fish out of water. So long as their side is up.

Do they really think the American public is that stupid? oh.... never mind.... don't answer that..

 

[desert dude]

Yes because democrats just love starting wars. History definitely is against them. When did opinions = fact? I must have missed that memo.

This is a quote from a Democratic leader, Chuck Schumer, one of the biggest douche bags on the planet but that is a different topic.

You disagree with Schumer?

 

[Samwell Seed Well]

I'm sure desert dude is thinking up some half witted attempt at being right.

ya right after he huffs some red white and blue paint and molest a lawn gnome

 

[timbo123]

WAR? Good gawd y'all what is it good for? Absolutely nothing... say it again.

 

[desert dude]

This is a quote from a Democratic leader, Chuck Schumer, one of the biggest douche bags on the planet but that is a different topic.

You disagree with Schumer?

<edit> My personal opinion is that Obama and Romney are about equally likely to start a war with Iran.

 

[UncleBuck]

This is a quote from a Democratic leader, Chuck Schumer, one of the biggest douche bags on the planet but that is a different topic.

You disagree with Schumer?

no, chuck schumer speaks for all of us. he is actually secretly the president.

didn't you know that?

i heard some guy at a bus stop rambling somewhat incoherently, but i heard him mention he is a republican and fucks dogs. thus you fuck your dog. the homeless guy speaks for all.

 

[desert dude]

no, chuck schumer speaks for all of us. he is actually secretly the president.

didn't you know that?

i heard some guy at a bus stop rambling somewhat incoherently, but i heard him mention he is a republican and fucks dogs. thus you fuck your dog. the homeless guy speaks for all.

I would agree that a bum rambling at a bus stop is about as reliable as Schumer, or most Democratic Senators, so you have a point.

 

[UncleBuck]

I would agree that a bum rambling at a bus stop is about as reliable as Schumer, or most Democratic Senators, so you have a point.

i was illustrating your logical fallacy, dog fucker.

don't forget the peanut butter, you dishonest race baiting dog fucking piece of shit.

 

[Samwell Seed Well]

This is a quote from a Democratic leader, Chuck Schumer, one of the biggest douche bags on the planet but that is a different topic.

You disagree with Schumer?

why woudl you blame the hurricane that prevented the GOP convetion from going off withotu a hitch on bill nye, i heard some GOP on fox blaming the evolution theory adn Bill nye. .. shame on you leave bill nye out of this