The most belivable conspiracy theory

Witch one as the most chance of being a real conspiracy?

  • 9/11

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • JFK assassination

    Votes: 12 44.4%
  • Fake moon landing

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • Princess Diana aranged accident

    Votes: 2 7.4%
  • Roswell

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • AIDS a manifactered virus

    Votes: 3 11.1%
  • The OP is an idiotic scaremonger

    Votes: 4 14.8%

  • Total voters
    27
  • Poll closed .

Zaehet Strife

Well-Known Member
I do not side with either, i am unconvinced. But this does look pretty fishy. Tower 7 was not hit by a plane, nor was it damaged by either of the other two towers.

[video=youtube;Atbrn4k55lA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Atbrn4k55lA[/video]
 

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
I do not side with either, i am unconvinced. But this does look pretty fishy. Tower 7 was not hit by a plane, nor was it damaged by either of the other two towers.

[video=youtube;Atbrn4k55lA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Atbrn4k55lA[/video]

It was the fire duh. LOL
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
I do not side with either, i am unconvinced. But this does look pretty fishy. Tower 7 was not hit by a plane, nor was it damaged by either of the other two towers.

[video=youtube;Atbrn4k55lA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Atbrn4k55lA[/video]
your statement is quite true.

wtc 7 was hit by no planes, nor was it dmaged by the fall of either tower. this is inescapable.

it was however hit by several hundred tonnes of flaming rubble ejected from the tower when it was hit by the plane. this rubble knocked a hole in the side bigger than a football pitch. this flaming rubble started numerous fires which ignited the diesel fuel stored for the regional emergency management center for most of new england (lol irony) this resulted in the building's collapse
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
your statement is quite true.

wtc 7 was hit by no planes, nor was it dmaged by the fall of either tower. this is inescapable.

it was however hit by several hundred tonnes of flaming rubble ejected from the tower when it was hit by the plane. this rubble knocked a hole in the side bigger than a football pitch. this flaming rubble started numerous fires which ignited the diesel fuel stored for the regional emergency management center for most of new england (lol irony) this resulted in the building's collapse
I have never heard of the diesel fuel theory before, diesel fuel doesn't burn hot enough to even soften steel. Seems illogical.
 

Zaehet Strife

Well-Known Member
your statement is quite true.

wtc 7 was hit by no planes, nor was it dmaged by the fall of either tower. this is inescapable.

it was however hit by several hundred tonnes of flaming rubble ejected from the tower when it was hit by the plane. this rubble knocked a hole in the side bigger than a football pitch. this flaming rubble started numerous fires which ignited the diesel fuel stored for the regional emergency management center for most of new england (lol irony) this resulted in the building's collapse
Links please bro.
 

Fergman

Member
Building 7.... the only building of its size to be destroyed by fire alone. That building came straight down to the ground just like the twin towers. Even to this day I remember saying " It looks like they demo'ed them!!!"

Even if it soften the steel, do you see the building falling the way it did? Those building were in freefall from the beginning they started to fall. If you could just burn a skyscraper and it will fall straight down, then why do you demo it?

Why did they rush to clean up the site and send all of the metal to China to be melted down instead of our steel plants?

9/11 just doesn't add up to me.

Also, look at the videos of the building coming down. Look at the middle of the building as it falls and you will see the middle falling first before the walls. Thats because the building " bones" were broken beforehand. Same thing they do when they demo a building.

This is what I believe at least. Never believed a word they said once I saw them come down on live TV. Horrible day.......
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Building 7.... the only building of its size to be destroyed by fire alone. That building came straight down to the ground just like the twin towers. Even to this day I remember saying " It looks like they demo'ed them!!!"

Even if it soften the steel, do you see the building falling the way it did?
The towers fell from the top down. Once one floor let go, the others could not "stop the freight train".
Those building were in freefall from the beginning they started to fall. If you could just burn a skyscraper and it will fall straight down, then why do you demo it?
Because burning it from the inside is not a reliable way to get the result. A controlled implosion using the right charges has a much higher chance of going right ... and you can time it.
Why did they rush to clean up the site and send all of the metal to China to be melted down instead of our steel plants?
Do we still have steel mills that could accept the scrap? cn
9/11 just doesn't add up to me.
 

Moses Mobetta

Well-Known Member
Building 7.... the only building of its size to be destroyed by fire alone. That building came straight down to the ground just like the twin towers. Even to this day I remember saying " It looks like they demo'ed them!!!"

Even if it soften the steel, do you see the building falling the way it did? Those building were in freefall from the beginning they started to fall. If you could just burn a skyscraper and it will fall straight down, then why do you demo it?

Why did they rush to clean up the site and send all of the metal to China to be melted down instead of our steel plants?

9/11 just doesn't add up to me.
While working on a 12 story hotel, we had some weather come up - winds and rain, not a hurricane mind you. Several days before there was a huge drywall delivery, the drywall, portable toilets and other items in the buildings top floors was blown out onto cars in a parking lot a block away. I am still amazed at those bldg's coming straight down the way they did. Controlled? Seems suspicious at the very least. You ever notice Bush before the trade centers and then how he appeared afterward, seemed very different to me. Still an idiot just different.
 

Fergman

Member
Because burning it from the inside is not a reliable way to get the result. A controlled implosion using the right charges has a much higher chance of going right ... and you can time it.
Do we still have steel mills that could accept the scrap? cn
Well, burning the towers and building 7 brought them straight to the ground and yes we still have steelmills. Also, the damage was done about the 70th floor. ( give or take) If fire was the factor, I would see the top half breaking loose before the whole thing would come down the way it did.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Well, burning the towers and building 7 brought them straight to the ground and yes we still have steelmills. Also, the damage was done about the 70th floor. ( give or take) If fire was the factor, I would see the top half breaking loose before the whole thing would come down the way it did.
It came down the way all stack buildings do when they collapse
And that is essentially what the world trade center towers were
Stack slab construction
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Building 7.... the only building of its size to be destroyed by fire alone. That building came straight down to the ground just like the twin towers. Even to this day I remember saying " It looks like they demo'ed them!!!"

Even if it soften the steel, do you see the building falling the way it did? Those building were in freefall from the beginning they started to fall. If you could just burn a skyscraper and it will fall straight down, then why do you demo it?

Why did they rush to clean up the site and send all of the metal to China to be melted down instead of our steel plants?

9/11 just doesn't add up to me.

Also, look at the videos of the building coming down. Look at the middle of the building as it falls and you will see the middle falling first before the walls. Thats because the building " bones" were broken beforehand. Same thing they do when they demo a building.

This is what I believe at least. Never believed a word they said once I saw them come down on live TV. Horrible day.......
the big ass hole in the building combined with fire precludes the "fire alone" statement. several hundred metric tons of concrete and steel falling form a thousand feet up smacked the building around like a prison bitch, lit in on fire and caused it to fall down.


thus there is a massive impact event, serious structural damage, fire, and then more fire, electrical transformers bowing out, causing more explosions, more fire, and eventually gravity took over and the building slumped into itself.

skyscrapers dont totter and fall over like a drunk at last call, they collapse into themselves. even large buildings destroyed by artillery shelling, bomb strikes and the nuclear blasts in japan fell down, they didnt tip like trees and crush the rest of the town under them. buildings dont have THAT kind of fibrous longitudinal strength like trees do. they break and fall straight down with only minor lateral movement. the only exception is strong earthquakes which sometimes tip over shitty large buildings the way 9-11 conspiracy believers imagine.

controlled demolition is performed for the same reason cars are stripped before they get crushed. it's more efficient and cheaper to put a few charges in a pre-weakened building stripped of all it's valuables than to just give some dumbass a tanker full of diesel and a backfiring torch. that would be retarded. if the buildings had been prof3essionally demolished with preset charges designed to implode the towers (as is theorized by loose change versions 1-9, 9/11 truth.com, and the "jews did it" faction of the troofers et al) then there would have been little to no damage to any building which was not set with charges. the only way the troofer conspiracy works is:

Tower 1: destroyed as a false flag op to enabler the war in iraq by bush, cheney and newt gingrich

Tower 2: a gracenote to help ensure the false flag operation's success. (one building is insufficient to raise the level of rage in america,, plus like pringles,, once you pop, you cant stop.)

WTC 7: part of a second clearly independent though remarkably coincidental operation to destroy the FCC and SEC investigations int lehman brothers, goldman sachs, bernie madoff and the illuminati plans for one world government.

The Pentagon: They were asking for it.

The people on the planes: as they were merely "Little Eichmens", their deaths were in a noble cause to further the aims of the one world government illuminati lizard people,, and the nephilim in their plans to destroy all orgone ray weapons in new york and new jersey as prelude to their invasion... obviously.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
While working on a 12 story hotel, we had some weather come up - winds and rain, not a hurricane mind you. Several days before there was a huge drywall delivery, the drywall, portable toilets and other items in the buildings top floors was blown out onto cars in a parking lot a block away. I am still amazed at those bldg's coming straight down the way they did. Controlled? Seems suspicious at the very least. You ever notice Bush before the trade centers and then how he appeared afterward, seemed very different to me. Still an idiot just different.
high winds can pick up any light object (like sheetrock and honeyhuts) and throw them like tumbleweeds. if you ever get down in LA around october you can get on a bicycle and ride from camarillo to port hueneme (about 20 miles of almost flat road) without pedaling. the santa ana winds can strip trees bare of leaves, pull shiungle roofs off wood frame buildings and send a dropped $20 into the next county before you can say "aww fuck"

concrete and steel are much harder to move than sheetrock and honeyhuts, and they only co-operate with being moved if the direction they are moving is Down.

also,, were the honeyhuts full? i hope so
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
The towers fell from the top down. Once one floor let go, the others could not "stop the freight train". Because burning it from the inside is not a reliable way to get the result. A controlled implosion using the right charges has a much higher chance of going right ... and you can time it.
Do we still have steel mills that could accept the scrap? cn
those bildings used spray on asbestos fire insulation. in the US it is a class A carcinogen and treated like nuclear waste. sending it to another country is the only way,, you cant even store it. if they hadnt busted it up, and shipped it out they would have faced even more lolsuits from every jackhole with a sore throat for their "mesothelioma"
 

PeyoteReligion

Well-Known Member
Wow for sure thought the princess Diana one was a lock for sure. I don't even know if it's even a legit conspiracy theory. Guess like canna I just don't really care. And I don't find any of the other ones plausible. Just theories.

*climbs back into bushes*
 

Moses Mobetta

Well-Known Member
high winds can pick up any light object (like sheetrock and honeyhuts) and throw them like tumbleweeds. if you ever get down in LA around october you can get on a bicycle and ride from camarillo to port hueneme (about 20 miles of almost flat road) without pedaling. the santa ana winds can strip trees bare of leaves, pull shiungle roofs off wood frame buildings and send a dropped $20 into the next county before you can say "aww fuck"

concrete and steel are much harder to move than sheetrock and honeyhuts, and they only co-operate with being moved if the direction they are moving is Down.

also,, were the honeyhuts full? i hope so
I'm familliar with the Santa Anna winds. Also felt bldg's move-sway under winds, seen men thrown around like cottonballs. Been in construction 30 years and have seen concrete columns and structures fall over sideways. It's amazing more people weren't killed when those bldg's collapsed. As for those shitters that was just nasty.
 
Top