100 US combat troops going to Uganda

dukeanthony

New Member
There has been over 34,000 deaths here in Mexico since Calderon ramped up Mexico's War on Drugs, maybe the US should send some non-intervening combat troops down here, too. Or how about Syria, they're killing their people, too. Or how about North Korea... or Myanmar...
Congress approves it
Its Ok
Ask Ron Paul
 

beardo

Well-Known Member
There has been over 34,000 deaths here in Mexico since Calderon ramped up Mexico's War on Drugs, maybe the US should send some non-intervening combat troops down here, too. Or how about Syria, they're killing their people, too. Or how about North Korea... or Myanmar...
There allready sending them guns....
And flying drones over Mexico
 

splifchris

Well-Known Member
There has been over 34,000 deaths here in Mexico since Calderon ramped up Mexico's War on Drugs, maybe the US should send some non-intervening combat troops down here, too. Or how about Syria, they're killing their people, too. Or how about North Korea... or Myanmar...
Pretty sure there are plenty of non-intervening combat troops in Mexico, Syria N.Korea and Myanmar!!!
 

beardo

Well-Known Member
Yes it does
Check your constitution
What is that supposed to mean? Just because congress approves an illegal act, doesn't make it Constitutional.
He was right, but it's apparent he has no idea why,
The president can deploy troops, for a set number of days without congressional approval or declaration of war,
Thats what he did in lybia, but he exceeded the number of days allowed.
 

Mr Neutron

Well-Known Member
He was right, but it's apparent he has no idea why,
The president can deploy troops, for a set number of days without congressional approval or declaration of war,
Thats what he did in lybia, but he exceeded the number of days allowed.
Yes, by abusing the executive order option. Executive orders are not meant to supersede the Constitution.
 

The Ruiner

Well-Known Member
Wow...for such a slippery slope to Vietnam you would think that the US would have buckled under 150 wars of that magnitude...

150 btw is the number of countries in which the US has troops deployed. Actually, more.
 

Mr Neutron

Well-Known Member
Constitution says

NO
Totally Legal
Now shut your whining pie hole
So you're in favor of sacrificing American lives to prop up the EMPIRE, huh? Sending our troops wherever the Commander in Chief has a hardon for?
Didn't know you were a war mongering neo-con.
 

dukeanthony

New Member
So you're in favor of sacrificing American lives to prop up the EMPIRE, huh? Sending our troops wherever the Commander in Chief has a hardon for?
Didn't know you were a war mongering neo-con.
I support the Constitution
Constitution says the president and congress have a duty to support our Allies
We are sending Advisors
Read that as
We are sending Special ops and CIA to point out and help destroy a christian Militant terror group that uses children rape, murder and Mutilation to bring Jesus Christ to the natives
I'm all for it
BTW you are singling out Obama for this but it goes all the back to Bush jr. The Spec Ops Trained Gautemalans we sent in 2006 got their ass handed to them
Literally Just before they got their heads cut off
 

The Ruiner

Well-Known Member
To sum this up...

"proxy-war"

I like how the US always has to take heat for stepping up and "doing the right thing" in the world when no one else has the courage to do so...If the world was absent a US, we would be living in the thousand year reich.
 

dukeanthony

New Member
So you're in favor of sacrificing American lives to prop up the EMPIRE, huh? Sending our troops wherever the Commander in Chief has a hardon for?
Didn't know you were a war mongering neo-con.
And what Empire?
Uganda has shitty coffee and a aids infested population
 
Top