Climate in the 21st Century

Will Humankind see the 22nd Century?

  • Not a fucking chance

    Votes: 41 28.5%
  • Maybe. if we get our act together

    Votes: 35 24.3%
  • Yes, we will survive

    Votes: 68 47.2%

  • Total voters
    144

injinji

Well-Known Member

Decarbonising AMMONIA production. Could a revolutionary new process be the key?

Ammonia is produced in large volumes each year and is in constant use in industries like agriculture, petrochemicals and pharmaceuticals. But it also has great potential as a fuel source, if only a way could be found to produce it without the huge carbon dioxide emissions it currently creates. Now a team at Monash University say they've found an economically viable way to do just that.
I heard a story on NPR about replacing the limestone in concrete with another type of stone. (I can't remember what show it was, or how long ago I heard it) They say it's the same concrete, just a ton less carbon.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
I heard a story on NPR about replacing the limestone in concrete with another type of stone. (I can't remember what show it was, or how long ago I heard it) They say it's the same concrete, just a ton less carbon.
I usually post stuff like that to the renewables thread, but since it concerned global food production, I figured here was a good spot. I'll leave this thread to the weather and more natural approaches to fixing climate change and put the tech in the thread about what is being done about climate change. We have little choice but to try and there could be many economic benefits and money makes the world go round. There are major policy and geopolitical fights over it now with America vs China because there is big money and future energy independence at stake.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I heard a story on NPR about replacing the limestone in concrete with another type of stone. (I can't remember what show it was, or how long ago I heard it) They say it's the same concrete, just a ton less carbon.
Limestone is fine if the kilns to make clinker are not hydrocarbon-fired. Setting concrete absorbs as much CO2 as was released by the kiln.
 

Aeroknow

Well-Known Member
So just curious what you guys think about this.
IMG_9175.jpeg
We are only going to get about 70% of the lawsuit monies that we were supposed to get from the PG&E fire lawsuit. It is supposed to make us whole. 70% because they filed bankruptcy.
Should we pay taxes on this? Is that right?
I hate republicans but Doug Lamalfa introduced a bill a couple years ago and it went no where. Was supposed to hit the house floor and then McCarthy got fired. Word is it’s being reintroduced.
What do you guys think? Should this be taxable like regular income?
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
So just curious what you guys think about this.
View attachment 5359695
We are only going to get about 70% of the lawsuit monies that we were supposed to get from the PG&E fire lawsuit. It is supposed to make us whole. 70% because they filed bankruptcy.
Should we pay taxes on this? Is that right?
I hate republicans but Doug Lamalfa introduced a bill a couple years ago and it went no where. Was supposed to hit the house floor and then McCarthy got fired. Word is it’s being reintroduced.
What do you guys think? Should this be taxable like regular income?
hell no. It should go into building it back.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Top