Senate Independents Scrambling Ahead Of Crucial Bill C-45 Cannabis Vote

gb123

Well-Known Member
Most expect the bill to survive a second reading but "accidents can happen

OTTAWA — Senate independents are scrambling to find out how many of their members will show up to a crucial vote Thursday on the Liberal government's cannabis legislation and how they plan to vote, if they do make it, HuffPost Canada has learned.


If few independent senators show up or a dozen vote with the Tories in opposing C-45, the marijuana legalization bill — and the Grits' election promise — will go up in smoke.

Early Wednesday morning, senators Raymonde Saint-Germain and Pau Woo wrote to their colleagues informing them that they had learned the Conservatives would call for a standing vote on second reading of C-45 Thursday.


Whatever your views may be on C45, Thursday's vote is very important, and we believe that we should have as many ISG [independent Senate group] members as possible in the chamber for that vote.Senators Raymonde Saint-Germaine and Pau Woo
"Our sense is that they are willing to take the risk of having the bill defeated at Second Reading, and — in that event — to blame independent senators for failing to ensure its passage," the senators wrote.

"Whatever your views may be on C45, Thursday's vote is very important, and we believe that we should have as many ISG [independent Senate group] members as possible in the chamber for that vote.


"If you are planning to leave early on Thursday, please do what you can to adjust your travel so that you can stay till the end of the sitting.

"If you are currently away from Ottawa, please try your best to return for Thursday's sitting.


"In any event, please provide the Secretariat with an update on your availability for a vote on Thursday.

"The situation is volatile and may change yet again. However, our assessment at this stage is that we should prepare for an alternative scenario, hence this request, which we do not make lightly."



JUSTIN TANG/THE CANADIAN PRESS
Health Minister Ginette Petitpas Taylor speaks as she appears as a witness along with Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale, Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould and M.P. Bill Blair at a Senate Committee in the Senate Chamber on Bill C-45, the Cannabis Act, on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Feb. 6, 2018.


Later Wednesday, the secretariat of the independent Senate group sent out a survey asking two basic questions, noting the results with be anonymous.

1. Will you be present for the vote on Second Reading of C-45 on Thursday, March 22?
2. If you will be present, how do you intend to vote on the Second Reading of C-45?

Most Senate observers HuffPost spoke with expect the bill will survive second reading and head off to committee for further study. But one government source stated: "Accidents can happen.... We are a little worried."

Back in 2014, Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau kicked Liberal senators out of the Liberal caucus. He pledged to appoint only independent senators. A handful of Liberal senators insisted on still being called Liberals but neither the independents nor the Liberals caucus with Trudeau's MPs. Only the government's representative in the Senate has been appointed to do the government's bidding.



JUSTIN TANG/THE CANADIAN PRESS
Raymonde Saint-Germain (centre) stands with Senators Raymonde Gagne (left) and Peter Harder before being sworn into the Senate, on Parliament Hill on Dec. 1, 2016 in Ottawa.


Earlier this week, that man, Peter Harder, seemed to plead with his Senate colleagues about the limits of their new roles.

"For an unelected Senate, legitimacy lies in the very sage use of great power. Legitimacy as an appointed body depends on understanding one's limits," Harder told the Government Relations and Public Affairs Practitioners Forum Tuesday.

"...the Senate's power to defeat government legislation has rarely been invoked, and only in the gravest of circumstances. Canadians expect, quite rightly, that their elected representatives have the last word," the Liberals' point man in the red chamber said. "The Senate's role in our democracy is not to defeat a bill that puts in place a duly elected government's electoral pledge."

During the 2015 election campaign, Trudeau ran on a promise to legalize cannabis.

The Conservatives know this but firmly oppose the plan. Harder is hoping some independents and, perhaps, even some of the Liberals in the upper house, will understand that it is not their job to defeat something Canadians supported at the polls.



SEAN KILPATRICK/THE CANADIAN PRESS
Conservative Sen. Don Plett arrives at the Senate on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Oct. 28, 2013.


Conservative whip Don Plett refused to confirm whether the Tories are planning to request a rare standing vote — a way of placing on the record how each senator votes.

"We can't defeat this bill. We are only 33 members in the chamber. We can't defeat anything," he told HuffPost. But if the Independents don't show up, Plett said: "Then we haven't defeated it; they have defeated it themselves."

The independents have 43 members, more than any other group, Plett noted. "They are organized as a group, but they can't organize. And that, of course, is their problem, not ours."

Trudeau's desire for an independent Senate "is coming back to bite him," Plett suggested.

"Their problem is this: They cannot get straight answers from the Trudeau appointees because they are actually saying: 'You know, Justin Trudeau has told us so emphatically that we are independent' that some of them are starting to believe that."

The Senate is scheduled to meet at 1:30 pm Thursday. There are more than 11 speakers scheduled to speak on C-45, meaning the vote is likely to happen after 6 p.m.

Current standing in the Senate:

Independent Senators Group: 43

Conservative Party of Canada: 33

Liberal Party of Canada: 11

Non-affiliated: 6

Vacant seats: 12
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
What they aren't telling you is cannabis will no longer be illegal on July 1st...it just won't be available for retail sales. The senator's job is to pass the bill allowing retail recreational sales and the unconstitutional impaired driving bill. Our participation in the UN war on cannabis ends. If everyone were to act like it was legal come July 1st with the exception of sales, there is FA anyone can do about it. We need to plan a day of public protest on July 1st to let the senators know we don't care about their kindergarten antics and they will not hold Canadians hostage while they play games.
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
Government's cannabis bill faces live-or-die vote in Senate today
The government's cannabis bill faces outright defeat in the Senate today if it can't secure enough support from members of the Red Chamber.

According to an agreed timetable, senators will hold a vote at second reading of the bill today. If the opposition Tories cobble together enough votes to defeat C-45, the legislation would be effectively dead — meaning the government would have to restart the entire legislative process in the House.

If that happens, a summer timeline for legalization becomes much less likely.

Most Independent and Liberal senators generally support the bill, and together they hold 54 of the chamber's 93 occupied seats. But that doesn't guarantee that all of those members will vote together as a block or be present when the vote is recorded.

New senators have been appointed as Independents — leaving the Liberal government with no mechanism to whip votes or force them to attend sittings in the chamber.

Moreover, two Senate committees are on the road: members of the agriculture committee are meeting with stakeholders in Calgary, while the Aboriginal peoples committee is in Winnipeg. That means as many as 20 senators — most of them Independent — will be out of the mix today when a vote is held. Others, like Independent Quebec Sen. Jacques Demers, are not expected to be in attendance because of illness.

The 33 Conservative senators generally vote in lockstep on government legislation, since they all still sit as members of a national party caucus.

Government sources, speaking on background, suggest they have enough support from Independent senators to win the vote. But the slim margin is ringing alarm bells on the government side, as only a few absences could derail a key government policy.

When asked if the government has a plan B ready in the event the bill is defeated, a spokesperson for Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould said the minister still expects the legislation to face a final vote in the Senate on or before June 7, a timeline the Senate leadership agreed to last month.

"The minister has been following the Senate's debate on C-45 since it came to that place last November. She looks forward to appearing before the Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs as part of the 'pre-study' of certain aspects of the legislation," the spokesperson said.

Scathing criticism

Conservative senators have delivered scathing condemnations of the legislation that will legalize the recreational use of cannabis in this country.

Tory senators say they worry the legislation will endanger youth, increase smoking rates, complicate the work of police officers, lead to a backlog of court cases for possession offences and do little to curb black market sales of the drug.

"Driven by a self-imposed, artificial political deadline of implementation by this summer, the Trudeau government has hastily assembled Bill C-45 and its companion impaired driving legislation, Bill C-46," Conservative Saskatchewan Sen. Denise Batters said in a speech to the chamber on Tuesday.

"Both bills are shoddily constructed and raise a myriad of unanswered questions that will lead to unintended and devastating consequences.

"Honourable senators, this is too high a price for Canadians to pay simply to satisfy Prime Minister Trudeau's political ambitions. For all of these reasons, I will vote against Bill C-45 at second reading."

Batters is not alone. At least six other Conservative senators have vowed publicly to vote against the bill, arguing the Liberals are pushing ahead with a massive societal change under a constrained timeframe.

"We, the select few with sober second thought, should not consider saying 'yes' to this odious legislation until we, on behalf of all Canadians, have all the answers. I believe that, at a minimum, an intensive four-year education blitz should begin now before any government contemplates legislation," Conservative Alberta Sen. Betty Unger said.

" style="margin-bottom: 1em; color: rgb(38, 40, 42); font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px;">

Conservative New Brunswick Sen. Carolyn Stewart Olsen is equally unconvinced.

"The rush is incomprehensible," she said. "Within the space of a year we have gone from debating supervised heroin injection to pushing cannabis use nationwide.


"I'm not sure Canadians want Canada to be known for its liberal drug laws."

The bill's defenders — including its sponsor in the Senate, Independent Ontario Sen. Tony Dean — say the government does not have the luxury of time. They say illegal cannabis use — a $7 billion industry that funnels funds into the hands of organized crime, according to government figures — will continue unabated without the benefit of federal regulations.

The Liberal government's representative in the Senate, Peter Harder, has made an impassioned plea to appointed senators to debate legislation thoroughly and propose amendments if necessary — but to hold off on defeating government bills that implement promises made in the last election.

Senate rules could prove fatal

The defeat of a government bill at such an early legislative stage is rare.

If a bill is defeated in the Senate at second reading, nothing further happens to it. The Senate moves on to the next item on the order paper and the bill, in effect, is dead.

The government could then introduce a similar bill, but it would need to be an entirely new piece of legislation and not simply a revival of the old one.

"If the motion for second reading is defeated, the bill dies and cannot be reintroduced in the same session, since reintroduction would be contrary to the decision of the chamber and a violation of the same question rule," says the Senate Procedure in Practice (SPIP), the chamber's guidebook.

The "same question rule" is a basic principle of parliamentary procedure that demands "that a house should not consider the same matter a second time in the same session if it has already made a decision on it," according to SPIP.

So any new legislation would have to be different enough to be admissible.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has said he expects full legalization of cannabis by "summer."

 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
"Tory senators say they worry the legislation will endanger youth, increase smoking rates, complicate the work of police officers, lead to a backlog of court cases for possession offences and do little to curb black market sales of the drug."
You can't make this stupidity up, folks. We have had a cannabis free-for-all for the better part of a century, but somehow these neanderthals think by REMOVING laws around possession and consumption is "going to lead to a backlog in court cases for possession". This is nothing more than the party sitting in opposition using the senate to play political games.
Time to once again demand the senate be abolished. We can turn their arrogance and idiocy upside down on the fuckers and make them start scrambling to keep their jobs. Again.
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
"Tory senators say they worry the legislation will endanger youth, increase smoking rates, complicate the work of police officers, lead to a backlog of court cases for possession offences and do little to curb black market sales of the drug."
You can't make this stupidity up, folks. We have had a cannabis free-for-all for the better part of a century, but somehow these neanderthals think by REMOVING laws around possession and consumption is "going to lead to a backlog in court cases for possession". This is nothing more than the party sitting in opposition using the senate to play political games.
Time to once again demand the senate be abolished. We can turn their arrogance and idiocy upside down on the fuckers and make them start scrambling to keep their jobs. Again.
they do want more criminal laws lol
seems only right by what they say with their thinking
its weather or not its ok that they accomplish their crazy act lol and add more criminality to this deal. ;)
 
Top