Progressive Party **Official Thread**

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
tell me why Justice Democrats tried to hide the fact they're intentionally a superPAC to accept unlimited Corporate Donations?
http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/692/201701099041203692/201701099041203692.pdf

Last paragraph.

They didn't have to register that way but did.

Why?
Funding

What type of organization is Justice Democrats?

Justice Democrats is a federal political action committee. We are required to be a PAC to accept donations and spend money toward electing federal candidates. PACs have a maximum contribution limit of $5,000 and must report all donations and expenditures. This is not a SuperPAC, but a plain old regular PAC.
You can learn more about PACs at http://fec.gov. The PAC uses donation money to hire staff that recruits and trains candidates, runs all Justice Democrats social media, send e-mails to the Justice Democrats e-mail list, manage the Justice Democrats website, answer all incoming e-mails to our help desk, create videos and other design assets that are used to promote Justice Democrats policies and candidates, handle inbound and outbound press communications, and also any other work involved with promoting Justice Democrats candidates as well as Justice Democrats issues. In addition to simply promoting candidates, Justice Democrats PAC also promotes issues. For example, we worked with the National Nurses United to pressure over 45 Democrats to co-sponsor Medicare-for-all in the House, getting H.R. 676 up to 121 co-sponsors -- the most it has ever received. Justice Democrats PAC has a board consisting of Kyle Kulinski, Zack Exley and Cenk Uygur that has legal control over the entity and the executive director of Justice Democrats is Saikat Chakrabarti. None of these people take any compensation from Justice Democrats.

One of Justice Democrats' goals is to get everyday, working people into Congress. Many of these people don't have a lot of campaign experience, and so in addition to endorsing candidates, Justice Democrats can help nascent campaigns get off the ground by providing a variety of campaign services directly to campaigns. These services includes a distributed field program in which candidates can opt-in to get access to an auto-dialer for voter contact, a texting tool for event turnout, a volunteer portal, and other general help on their field program. We also help candidates with recruiting campaign managers, message training, press, creative work, and a host of other services that campaigns require. The FEC requires that we charge campaigns money for any direct campaign services we do (otherwise, the service would count as a donation to the campaign), so we do these services at-cost to us, making no profit. By creating a scalable infrastructure that candidates can use to run their campaigns, we are able to start creating a party-like infrastructure that not only endorses and fundraises for candidates, but also provides them with the tools and people necessary to run a successful campaign.

Do you have a dollar amount cap on donations from any one individual?

Yes, it is the federal limit of $5,000.

Do you accept Dark Money? Will you be disclosing all donations?

Our designation as a Federal PAC does not allow us to receive anonymous or unlimited donations. Not only are we required by law to disclose all donors, but our platform is fundamentally opposed to corporate influence in American elections and pay-to-play politics in any form.


Who are the major funders?

The American people, with an average donation of $18.

Will The Young Turks receive any percentage of Justice Democrats donations?

No, 100% of donations will be used to build and run congressional campaigns.

Where can I go to see a list of your donors?

The Federal Election Commission posts all campaign filings publicly so you will be able (after the first filing is made) to review donor information here.

https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00630665/
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Fragile white girl, Obama was a confident black man. This has caused fragile white people to feel threatened and fearful.

When the dominant status of whites relative to racial and ethnic minorities is secure and unchallenged, white identity likely remains dormant. When whites perceive their group’s dominant status is threatened or their group is unfairly disadvantaged, however, their racial identity may become salient and politically relevant.

Obama threatened your perception of your own status. Fragile white girl.
dance puppet dance. :lol:
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Funding

What type of organization is Justice Democrats?

Justice Democrats is a federal political action committee. We are required to be a PAC to accept donations and spend money toward electing federal candidates. PACs have a maximum contribution limit of $5,000 and must report all donations and expenditures. This is not a SuperPAC, but a plain old regular PAC.
You can learn more about PACs at http://fec.gov. The PAC uses donation money to hire staff that recruits and trains candidates, runs all Justice Democrats social media, send e-mails to the Justice Democrats e-mail list, manage the Justice Democrats website, answer all incoming e-mails to our help desk, create videos and other design assets that are used to promote Justice Democrats policies and candidates, handle inbound and outbound press communications, and also any other work involved with promoting Justice Democrats candidates as well as Justice Democrats issues. In addition to simply promoting candidates, Justice Democrats PAC also promotes issues. For example, we worked with the National Nurses United to pressure over 45 Democrats to co-sponsor Medicare-for-all in the House, getting H.R. 676 up to 121 co-sponsors -- the most it has ever received. Justice Democrats PAC has a board consisting of Kyle Kulinski, Zack Exley and Cenk Uygur that has legal control over the entity and the executive director of Justice Democrats is Saikat Chakrabarti. None of these people take any compensation from Justice Democrats.

One of Justice Democrats' goals is to get everyday, working people into Congress. Many of these people don't have a lot of campaign experience, and so in addition to endorsing candidates, Justice Democrats can help nascent campaigns get off the ground by providing a variety of campaign services directly to campaigns. These services includes a distributed field program in which candidates can opt-in to get access to an auto-dialer for voter contact, a texting tool for event turnout, a volunteer portal, and other general help on their field program. We also help candidates with recruiting campaign managers, message training, press, creative work, and a host of other services that campaigns require. The FEC requires that we charge campaigns money for any direct campaign services we do (otherwise, the service would count as a donation to the campaign), so we do these services at-cost to us, making no profit. By creating a scalable infrastructure that candidates can use to run their campaigns, we are able to start creating a party-like infrastructure that not only endorses and fundraises for candidates, but also provides them with the tools and people necessary to run a successful campaign.

Do you have a dollar amount cap on donations from any one individual?

Yes, it is the federal limit of $5,000.

Do you accept Dark Money? Will you be disclosing all donations?

Our designation as a Federal PAC does not allow us to receive anonymous or unlimited donations. Not only are we required by law to disclose all donors, but our platform is fundamentally opposed to corporate influence in American elections and pay-to-play politics in any form.


Who are the major funders?

The American people, with an average donation of $18.

Will The Young Turks receive any percentage of Justice Democrats donations?

No, 100% of donations will be used to build and run congressional campaigns.

Where can I go to see a list of your donors?

The Federal Election Commission posts all campaign filings publicly so you will be able (after the first filing is made) to review donor information here.

https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00630665/
Lol, so why did they specifically choose to register to take unlimited donations from Corporations?

If they were a regular PAC they'd be limited to donations of $5000 max.

They're a superPAC called something different to fool gullible rubes like you.

You dumb fucking cuck, you should stick to moderating duct tape anal spread reddits.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
@Padawanbater2 tell me that you are not this stupid to not know how a corporation can give unlimited amounts to campaigns.
One way is too give unlimited amounts to a non-profit that engages in political activity. You can do this anonymously
OK, so produce some evidence Justice Democrats has done anything differently than what I quoted in my earlier post
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
They didn't. That's propaganda you bought into because it confirms your bias against progressives. Everything is transparent, you can see how they registered on the FEC website

Name a corporation or individual who donated more than $5,000 - Federal Election Commission
Em...propaganda?

It's on the completed registration you fucking quoted two posts ago, you fucking moron.

Padarapist: I need proof!

Me: It's in your hand, you literally showed it to me and are waving it around

Padarapist: Nuh uh, establisment propaganda!
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Explain how "...set up an account to receive funds in unlimited amounts from individuals, Corporations, labor organizations and other political committees..." means anything other than exactly what it fucking says.
"The funds maintained in this separate account will not be used to make contributions,
whether direct, in-kind, or via coordinated communications, or coordinated expenditures, to federal candidates or
committees."


"On January 31, 2011, Retired Rear Admiral James Carey, Kelly Eustis and the National Defense Political Action Committee (collectively, “the Plaintiffs”) filed suit against the FEC. The lawsuit sought a declaratory judgment that the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. §§441a (a)(1)(C) and 441a(a)(3) violate the First Amendment to the extent such laws prohibit a nonconnected political committee from soliciting and accepting unlimited contributions to one bank account designated for independent expenditures, while maintaining a second, separate bank account designated for source- and amount-limited contributions to candidates and their authorized political committees. Plaintiffs also sought injunctive relief enjoining the Commission from enforcing the above-mentioned provisions as applied to Plaintiffs, and concurrently filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. On June 14, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted the Plaintiff's Motion Preliminary Injunction enjoining the Commission from enforcing the above-referenced provisions of Act.

On August 19, 2011, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entered a Stipulated Order and Consent Judgment whereby the Commission agreed that it would not enforce 2 U.S.C. §§441a(a)(1)(C) and 441a(a)(3) against the Plaintiffs with regard to contributions for independent expenditures."
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
"The funds maintained in this separate account will not be used to make contributions,
whether direct, in-kind, or via coordinated communications, or coordinated expenditures, to federal candidates or
committees."


"On January 31, 2011, Retired Rear Admiral James Carey, Kelly Eustis and the National Defense Political Action Committee (collectively, “the Plaintiffs”) filed suit against the FEC. The lawsuit sought a declaratory judgment that the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. §§441a (a)(1)(C) and 441a(a)(3) violate the First Amendment to the extent such laws prohibit a nonconnected political committee from soliciting and accepting unlimited contributions to one bank account designated for independent expenditures, while maintaining a second, separate bank account designated for source- and amount-limited contributions to candidates and their authorized political committees. Plaintiffs also sought injunctive relief enjoining the Commission from enforcing the above-mentioned provisions as applied to Plaintiffs, and concurrently filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. On June 14, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted the Plaintiff's Motion Preliminary Injunction enjoining the Commission from enforcing the above-referenced provisions of Act.

On August 19, 2011, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entered a Stipulated Order and Consent Judgment whereby the Commission agreed that it would not enforce 2 U.S.C. §§441a(a)(1)(C) and 441a(a)(3) against the Plaintiffs with regard to contributions for independent expenditures."
an account to receive funds in unlimited amounts from individuals, Corporations, labor organizations and other political committees
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
an account to receive funds in unlimited amounts from individuals, Corporations, labor organizations and other political committees
"The funds maintained in this separate account will not be used to make contributions,
whether direct, in-kind, or via coordinated communications, or coordinated expenditures, to federal candidates or
committees."


Weird, wonder why you'd cut out the second sentence in the paragraph...
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
"The funds maintained in this separate account will not be used to make contributions,
whether direct, in-kind, or via coordinated communications, or coordinated expenditures, to federal candidates or
committees."


Weird, wonder why you'd cut out the second sentence in the paragraph...
weird, i wonder why you are ok with UNLIMITED CORPORATE FUNDS.

and duct tape anal rape porn.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
weird, i wonder why you are ok with UNLIMITED CORPORATE FUNDS.
The only problem I've ever had with unlimited corporate funds is when they go to fund political candidates campaigns against FEC regulations, which they're not

You are a dupe who got fooled by propaganda because you thought it supported your position when it didn't

 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
The only problem I've ever had with unlimited corporate funds is when they go to fund political candidates campaigns against FEC regulations, which they're not

You are a dupe who got fooled by propaganda because you thought it supported your position when it didn't
You realize they can donate those funds to a seperate PAC to be donated to candidates...right?

You're either so dumb or dishonest that there needs to be a new word for it.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
You realize they can donate those funds to a seperate PAC to be donated to candidates...right?

You're either so dumb or dishonest that there needs to be a new word for it.
You realize political donations are transparent according to law, right?

That's why I asked you to find someone like the example you're using here. You're alleging things without actually providing any evidence to corroborate it
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
you literaly cried when obama got paid to write a book or hillary got paid to deliver a speech you obvious liar.
How are either of those related to campaign finance reform?

They're pay to play, quid pro quo, and it's apparent to anyone willing to look at the facts objectively. Things like that are what made the race between Clinton and Trump a toss up in the polls
 
Top