North Korea's Kim Jong-un: Stop Him Now

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
No Buck, Trump owns China. Granted, Trump is a stupid idiot in general terms. But he's a brilliant business man. And China is all about business in America. If not for the STUPID trade deals given up by previous presidents, China would importing OUR goods, instead of the other way around.

IDK if Trump will change that. But he's threatening to change it, which makes China afraid, which makes North Korea vulnerable.
China controls Commerce. (Bush-you are either with us or with the enemy. He was talking to the Corp world.) China is Big Oil's biggest customer.

Selling weed is easier at a concert then the street corner, and if you happen to be the one frisking at the door....
 

OldMedUser

Well-Known Member
"Well protected" is relative.
Very few things are well protected when it comes to nukes. Hell, they don't even have to be that accurate as long as the wind is blowing in the direction of your enemy.
It's extremely unlikely that the US is going to unleash a preemptive nuclear strike against NK and at the first sign of an invasion you can bet NK will fire all guns on Seoul.


Dave H. Kim
, Seoul resident; I research Korean foreign and security policy.
Answered 9 Aug 2016
Due to its reclusiveness and isolation from most of the global community, gathering intelligence on North Korea and estimating North Korea’s military capabilities is very difficult. Having said that, numerous analysts and think tanks have estimated several thousand artillery pieces—includes 130 mm, 170 mm and 240 mm artillery with a range of 27-plus km or more—to be near the DMZ and within striking distance of metropolitan Seoul. Higher estimates go well above 10,000 pieces. When we include rocket launchers, surface-to-surface missiles, and short-range ballistic missiles, the numbers are much, much higher.

So what do these mean? Calculations have been done that suggested well over 10,000 artillery rounds and potentially 4,000 long-range artillery rounds could be fired at Seoul per minute. Many thousands of massive rockets could also be fired by multiple rocket launchers (MRLs) before quickly retreating into underground hiding places. Even with lower estimates, when one includes North Korea’s Scud-B/Scud-C variants, Nodong and Musudan ballistic missiles and other missiles, Seoul is effective a city held hostage, and North Korea doesn’t need to worry about an invasion any time soon. It also means North Korea’s “legitimate reason” for pursuing nuclear weapons—the need to deter U.S. nuclear threat with its own nuclear deterrent—is simply a poor excuse and pretext to do as it wants.

A great place start learning more on the above is The Changing Military Balance in the Koreas and NE Asia (2015) by Anthony Cordesman.
 

JaJaJaJa

Well-Known Member
It's extremely unlikely that the US is going to unleash a preemptive nuclear strike against NK and at the first sign of an invasion you can bet NK will fire all guns on Seoul.


Dave H. Kim
, Seoul resident; I research Korean foreign and security policy.
Answered 9 Aug 2016
Due to its reclusiveness and isolation from most of the global community, gathering intelligence on North Korea and estimating North Korea’s military capabilities is very difficult. Having said that, numerous analysts and think tanks have estimated several thousand artillery pieces—includes 130 mm, 170 mm and 240 mm artillery with a range of 27-plus km or more—to be near the DMZ and within striking distance of metropolitan Seoul. Higher estimates go well above 10,000 pieces. When we include rocket launchers, surface-to-surface missiles, and short-range ballistic missiles, the numbers are much, much higher.

So what do these mean? Calculations have been done that suggested well over 10,000 artillery rounds and potentially 4,000 long-range artillery rounds could be fired at Seoul per minute. Many thousands of massive rockets could also be fired by multiple rocket launchers (MRLs) before quickly retreating into underground hiding places. Even with lower estimates, when one includes North Korea’s Scud-B/Scud-C variants, Nodong and Musudan ballistic missiles and other missiles, Seoul is effective a city held hostage, and North Korea doesn’t need to worry about an invasion any time soon. It also means North Korea’s “legitimate reason” for pursuing nuclear weapons—the need to deter U.S. nuclear threat with its own nuclear deterrent—is simply a poor excuse and pretext to do as it wants.

A great place start learning more on the above is The Changing Military Balance in the Koreas and NE Asia (2015) by Anthony Cordesman.
How much of that artillery and such even still works? It's probably from the 1950's or something.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
How much of that artillery and such even still works? It's probably from the 1950's or something.
The funny thing is that artillery pieces used to be larger and easier to maintain.

They're essentially a giant barrel on a stabilized recoil mount.
 

D528

Well-Known Member
Do you have evidence of NPR defending wrongful acts of the government? I listen to NPR every morning and afternoon to and from work. It is far from a partisan mouthpiece. Some of the most comprehensive and balanced reporting I've experienced.
Ba ba ba
 

OldMedUser

Well-Known Member
How much of that artillery and such even still works? It's probably from the 1950's or something.
Any country that can produce a nuclear weapon can probably keep conventional weapons in working condition. I wouldn't want to be the guy responsible for gambling with millions of lives and losing. Would you?
 

tampee

Well-Known Member
China controls Commerce. (Bush-you are either with us or with the enemy. He was talking to the Corp world.) China is Big Oil's biggest customer.

Selling weed is easier at a concert then the street corner, and if you happen to be the one frisking at the door....
So what about Obama??

Also it's easier to sell weed on the streets concerts are full of cops and good luck getting a pound through the frisking at the door. I roll a few joints wear a wife beater under my shirt and tuck in the wife beater and drop the joints in my wife beater they never pat the stomach. It's genius IMO. :)
 

tampee

Well-Known Member
How much of that artillery and such even still works? It's probably from the 1950's or something.
They are always using that artillery for practice and I'm sure they have the newer shit from China and Russia. I seen one documentary about North Korean labor camps in Russia they were just logging but they had real nice equipment like American loggers.
 

tampee

Well-Known Member
If the US decides to hit NK first to protect the "Fatherland" and a few million brown people die in the process half the world away I doubt that will matter much except for the political fallout. Still lots better than radioactive fallout. :)

The worst part of NK getting a missile to the mainland isn't the city it might wipe out but the electromagnetic pulse that could knock down the house of cards known as the electrical grid. That could knock out power to the whole lower 48 that could take years to repair and the resulting chaos would do way more damage than a dozen nukes from NK.

One mustn't overlook the fact that Russia has been busy modernizing it's military and building up it's armaments quietly in the background. For what purpose? A crippled Amerika would be easier pickings for a power hungry Putin eager to make the USSR great again. Stay tuned for more developments on that front.

:peace:
All our military shit is protected from EMP we can still destroy the world without a power grid. NATO as well puts a huge whole in the Russian take over theory. We have bases in Italy, Germany and Japan and Guam, Alaska, Hawaii probably more Guantanamo Bay Cuba :)

It will suck without power sure but I have a generator as do many others a lot of stores, hospitals, government buildings. We will still have freezers, ice will be available. Plenty of water in most of the country but the deserts will really suck but water will be shipped in thanks to FEMA I'm sure the National guards and fire departments will have plenty water until FEMA arrives.

If anything America will become stronger after an EMP atteck. :)

My only logical fear of North Korea is for South Koreans and Japanese along with our troops in the region they have proved they could nuke Japan that's about it. Of course they can sneak a couple sub's close enough to lob a few nukes at us but most will be shot down and we will MOAB the shit out of them showing the world our might by not even retaliating with nukes.

We have no reason to invade NK unless they use nukes. They would be better off sneaking in weaponized Bird Flu but preferably something we don't already know about like the zombie virus. bongsmilie
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
All our military shit is protected from EMP we can still destroy the world without a power grid. NATO as well puts a huge whole in the Russian take over theory. We have bases in Italy, Germany and Japan and Guam, Alaska, Hawaii probably more Guantanamo Bay Cuba :)

It will suck without power sure but I have a generator as do many others a lot of stores, hospitals, government buildings. We will still have freezers, ice will be available. Plenty of water in most of the country but the deserts will really suck but water will be shipped in thanks to FEMA I'm sure the National guards and fire departments will have plenty water until FEMA arrives.

If anything America will become stronger after an EMP atteck. :)

My only logical fear of North Korea is for South Koreans and Japanese along with our troops in the region they have proved they could nuke Japan that's about it. Of course they can sneak a couple sub's close enough to lob a few nukes at us but most will be shot down and we will MOAB the shit out of them showing the world our might by not even retaliating with nukes.

We have no reason to invade NK unless they use nukes. They would be better off sneaking in weaponized Bird Flu but preferably something we don't already know about like the zombie virus. bongsmilie
TLDR version: tampedo is literally retarded.
 

Drowning-Man

Well-Known Member
All our military shit is protected from EMP we can still destroy the world without a power grid. NATO as well puts a huge whole in the Russian take over theory. We have bases in Italy, Germany and Japan and Guam, Alaska, Hawaii probably more Guantanamo Bay Cuba :)

It will suck without power sure but I have a generator as do many others a lot of stores, hospitals, government buildings. We will still have freezers, ice will be available. Plenty of water in most of the country but the deserts will really suck but water will be shipped in thanks to FEMA I'm sure the National guards and fire departments will have plenty water until FEMA arrives.

If anything America will become stronger after an EMP atteck. :)

My only logical fear of North Korea is for South Koreans and Japanese along with our troops in the region they have proved they could nuke Japan that's about it. Of course they can sneak a couple sub's close enough to lob a few nukes at us but most will be shot down and we will MOAB the shit out of them showing the world our might by not even retaliating with nukes.

We have no reason to invade NK unless they use nukes. They would be better off sneaking in weaponized Bird Flu but preferably something we don't already know about like the zombie virus. bongsmilie
Not to mention all the nuclear missil submarines we have around the world and our naval armadas. Russia would still get destroyed
 

OldMedUser

Well-Known Member
So mutually assured destruction sounds like a good game plan does it?

My balls are bigger than your balls and I'm willing to kill the planet and everything on it to prove it. lol
 

tampee

Well-Known Member
Not if Russia's in the WH, remember that still functional air field in Syria?
Really? The most you can do to an airfield with bombs is put some craters in it that can be filled back in the next day.

Not to mention even if Trump was a Russian sleeper cell the military has to uphold the constitution.
 

Drowning-Man

Well-Known Member
Not to mention millions of american troops armed with old fashioned bullets mortars and rockets and hundred of millions of pissed off armed civians. A successful invasion of america is really impossible.
 

Drowning-Man

Well-Known Member
Really? The most you can do to an airfield with bombs is put some craters in it that can be filled back in the next day.

Not to mention even if Trump was a Russian sleeper cell the military has to uphold the constitution.
True im a veteran we swore an oath to the constitution not the president.
 

tampee

Well-Known Member
So mutually assured destruction sounds like a good game plan does it?

My balls are bigger than your balls and I'm willing to kill the planet and everything on it to prove it. lol
It's what ended the Cold War. If it happens it happens dinosaurs had their time if we are dumb enough our time will end sooner than planned by the cosmos. Earth will survive life will begin again we are all going to die anyways.
 
Top