Coalition Oversight-Audit Application into Coalition Finances

redi jedi

Well-Known Member
Redi Jedi once again your lack of education is on display. Please be advised that my personal hygeine or lack thereof is absolutely none of your business and that the definition of an enabler is a person that is wilfully blind to wrongful conduct and passively accepts wrongful conduct another word for such a person is being' cognitively dissonant' by holding two beliefs at once..knowing that wrongful conduct has occurred and knowing that you should do something but would rather not be bothered and therefore is required to be 'wilfully blind' to what is happening or to be an 'enabler'..
Yep I'm just a hairy back knuckle draggin mechanic...but I wasn't talkin about your hygiene there smarty pants.
 

Nadine Bews

Well-Known Member
Well only guessing, But I'd find it hard to believe they don't read your stuff here. And I think you know that and it to your overall advantage with leverage. You've said several times that this is the only place you can post that Wilcox can't delete. So I'd bet this conversation interests him...and Mr Conroy. You gettin any weird phone calls or cars parked outside. I bet they don't like you or this thread.
Hippy, Wilcox has labelled me as being 'drunk and delusional' and has called me a hater and I have had my life threatened but I fear my own self-destructive thoughts due to inaction or being an 'enabler' more than I do any of Wilcox's or his 'associates' threats, name calling and labelling.
 

Nadine Bews

Well-Known Member
I'll admit I don't know jack shit about business law, but it doesn't matter. I'm fishing for info and you are giving it to us...;)
Redi Jedi, the information that I post is for the public consumption and not to satisfy your need for you to feed your restless and inactive mind.
 

The Hippy

Well-Known Member
Hippy, Wilcox has labelled me as being 'drunk and delusional' and has called me a hater and I have had my life threatened but I fear my own self-destructive thoughts due to inaction or being an 'enabler' more than I do any of Wilcox's or his 'associates' threats, name calling and labelling.
That maybe...but you seem to be the force that could bring him down. Or at least get the ball rolling. I can bet he doesn't like you. Whatever your personality maybe has no bearing.
I'm on your side as I feel we were duped somewhat.
My guess is he reads every word here if he knows about this thread. Or course he'd never acknowledge that fact. Or would Conroy.
 

The Hippy

Well-Known Member
Yup...hence my sarcasim at cars n phone calls. I'm surprised no pay-off attempt was made.
If she goes away and drops it all of a sudden ....I'd say.....hmmmmm.
If she and us have been truly wrong....here we come Wilcox. Otherwise Jason....give the info needed to clear your name and stop this.
 

Nadine Bews

Well-Known Member
Yep I'm just a hairy back knuckle draggin mechanic...but I wasn't talkin about your hygiene there smarty pants.
Big Hairy Knuckle Dragging Mechanic..you have all of the requirements to qualify you as a member of Wilcox's TEAM..all you need now is a 54 inch waist-line with several large rolls of belly fat hanging around your mid-rift and the rest of your body covered in cheap tattoos, be grammatically challenged and be unable to articulate your thoughts and feelings and when you do speak you must speak from your emotions and not your intellect.
 
Last edited:

Nadine Bews

Well-Known Member
John Connroy, please stop avoiding me and respond to my demand for financial disclosure and instruct your client, Jason Wilcox, to produce audited financial statements in keeping with the generally accepted accounting policy and procedures (GAAPP) governing business in Canada. You and your firm are the legal entity in the joint-personal representative solicitor-client relationship with a non-lawyer, Jason F. Wilcox operating as the MMAR PPL/DPL Coalition against Repeal aka Cannabis Rights Coalition. Wilcox is the 'non-lawyer' entity in the legal relationship and you are paid to be his legal consultant on Coalition matters. I understand that Wilcox prefers to post brief updates via Facebook and make 'official statements' via his Youtube channel and his marketing enterprise Cannabis in Canada, however, I do not feel that it is appropriate that I should have to use social media sites to communicate this demand and to receive financial disclosure in this manner. I provided no less than $5,000 worth of cannabis lifestyle products at the Vancouver 2013 Health Expo, which you also attended as a guest speaker. Although you chose to avoid me, you saw me at my table with the merchandise and Coalition lock box soliciting funds from the public. I made one sale of a dozen pipes to the owner of a Maple Ridge business proprietor in the amount of $300 and handed the funds directly to Anne Genovy, Wilcox's ex-common-law partner. I also collected several hundred dollars in the lock box that week-end and never received an 'accounting' for those funds nor received the return of the unsold inventory. I do not understand why you do not respond. I understand that you do not feel that you are the corporate lawyer for the Coalition's current corporate status but you are certainly responsible for all funds raised under the joint-personal representative solicitor-client relationship with a non-lawyer (Wilcox) pursuant to the July 1, 2015 amendments to the definition of 'trust funds' in Rule 1 of the BC Professional Code of Conduct. Nadine Bews, MMAR PPL/DPL Coalition against Repeal, Founding Chair & Secretary-in-exile
 
Last edited:

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
John Connroy, please stop avoiding me and respond to my demand for financial disclosure and instruct your client, Jason Wilcox, to produce audited financial statements in keeping with the generally accepted accounting policy and procedures (GAAPP) governing business in Canada. You and your firm are the legal entity in the joint-personal representative solicitor-client relationship with a non-lawyer, Jason F. Wilcox operating as the MMAR PPL/DPL Coalition against Repeal aka Cannabis Rights Coalition. Wilcox is the 'non-lawyer' entity in the legal relationship and you are paid to be his legal consultant on Coalition matters. I understand that Wilcox prefers to post brief updates via Facebook and make 'official statements' via his Youtube channel and his marketing enterprise Cannabis in Canada, however, I do not feel that it is appropriate that I should have to use social media sites to communicate this demand and to receive financial disclosure in this manner. I provided no less than $5,000 worth of cannabis lifestyle products at the Vancouver 2013 Health Expo, which you also attended as a guest speaker. Although you chose to avoid me, you saw me at my table with the merchandise and Coalition lock box soliciting funds from the public. I made one sale of a dozen pipes to the owner of a Maple Ridge business proprietor in the amount of $300 and handed the funds directly to Anne Genovy, Wilcox's ex-common-law partner. I also collected several hundred dollars in the lock box that week-end and never received an 'accounting' for those funds nor received the return of the unsold inventory. I do not understand why you do not respond. I understand that you do not feel that you are the corporate lawyer for the Coalition's current corporate status but you are certainly responsible for all funds raised under the joint-personal representative solicitor-client relationship with a non-lawyer (Wilcox) pursuant to the July 1, 2015 amendments to the definition of 'trust funds' in Rule 1 of the BC Professional Code of Conduct. Nadine Bews, MMAR PPL/DPL Coalition against Repeal, Founding Chair & Secretary-in-exile
Nadine, it is very hard to support you even though I want to. You started off with allegations of death threats and kidnapping, but no mention of police involvement. When I and others commented on that, those criminal acts were forgotten and now it is about misappropriation of funds. You then held court on this forum and continue to do so.
I did not donate, so my money is not involved. I don't know you or Wilcox , so I'm not taking sides.
I would have done it differently. If I had had my security threatened, I would have gone to the cops immediately. That would 'get two birds stoned at once', first ending the threat and secondly triggering an investigation into his activities. I would not have come onto a public forum making unsubstantiated allegations, and I would not air my case in public. Anything posted here will be evidence in any real trial...either against the coalition or against you in a defamation suit.
My take is you understand you do not have a case and are using this forum to air a personal grudge. The problem
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
Nadine, it is very hard to support you even though I want to. You started off with allegations of death threats and kidnapping, but no mention of police involvement. When I and others commented on that, those criminal acts were forgotten and now it is about misappropriation of funds. You then held court on this forum and continue to do so.
I did not donate, so my money is not involved. I don't know you or Wilcox , so I'm not taking sides.
I would have done it differently. If I had had my security threatened, I would have gone to the cops immediately. That would 'get two birds stoned at once', first ending the threat and secondly triggering an investigation into his activities. I would not have come onto a public forum making unsubstantiated allegations, and I would not air my case in public. Anything posted here will be evidence in any real trial...either against the coalition or against you in a defamation suit.
My take is you understand you do not have a case and are using this forum to air a personal grudge. The problem
 

Nadine Bews

Well-Known Member
Nadine, it is very hard to support you even though I want to. You started off with allegations of death threats and kidnapping, but no mention of police involvement. When I and others commented on that, those criminal acts were forgotten and now it is about misappropriation of funds. You then held court on this forum and continue to do so.
I did not donate, so my money is not involved. I don't know you or Wilcox , so I'm not taking sides.
I would have done it differently. If I had had my security threatened, I would have gone to the cops immediately. That would 'get two birds stoned at once', first ending the threat and secondly triggering an investigation into his activities. I would not have come onto a public forum making unsubstantiated allegations, and I would not air my case in public. Anything posted here will be evidence in any real trial...either against the coalition or against you in a defamation suit.
My take is you understand you do not have a case and are using this forum to air a personal grudge. The problem
Vianarchris, I do not need your support nor do I care what you think, I am an independent non-designated forensic auditor and federal compliance officer as a result of my occupation and profession,therefore this is absolutely nothing personal but another work in progress. Vianarchris, it is painfully obvious that you and your mate RediJedi are preoccupied with something that is none of your business and have failed to grasp the most important fact that patients have been misled and robbed of almost one million dollars and are being labelled as criminals instead of as patients because of the failed Allard Action..It certainly appears, from a forensic auditor's perspective, that you are either a benefactor of Wilcox's largesse or else you are one of his 'minions' phishing for information on a matter that is absolutely none of your business...Vianarchris thanks for your concern but let me worry about the legal and other ramifications of posting public notice of same....it is none of your business unless you are a pervert and are fascinated by matters of control and power being exercised over another person through duress or force...and once again just be thankful that it did not happen to you or someone you love or else you may be surrounding yourself with needless negative and highly toxic energy and shall reap the rewards of same.
 
Last edited:

TheRealDman

Well-Known Member
Vianarchris, I do not need your support nor do I care what you think, I am an independent non-designated forensic auditor and federal compliance officer as a result of my occupation and profession,therefore this is absolutely nothing personal but another work in progress. Vianarchris, it is painfully obvious that you and your mate RediJedi are preoccupied with something that is none of your business and have failed to grasp the most important fact that patients have been misled and robbed of almost one million dollars and are being labelled as criminals instead of as patients because of the failed Allard Action..It certainly appears, from a forensic auditor's perspective, that you are either a benefactor of Wilcox's largesse or else you are one of his 'minions' phishing for information on a matter that is absolutely none of your business...Vianarchris thanks for your concern but let me worry about the legal and other ramifications of posting public notice of same....it is none of your business unless you are a pervert and are fascinated by matters of control and power being exercised over another person through duress or force...and once again just be thankful that it did not happen to you or someone you love or else you may be surrounding yourself with needless negative and highly toxic energy and shall reap the rewards of same.
When you post all this in a public forum, you're making it EVERYONE's business. If you don't care what we think, why continue posting it here?

@vanchris said he's got no dog in this fight, I do...and myself and others agree with him! If you don't want to hear everyone's opinion(s), stop posting in public forums.
 
Top