Hillary the lying machine Clinton!

CA MTN MAN

CA MTN MAN

Well-Known Member
Will the lies ever stop? Hillary voted to invade in 2002. If I was a pathological liar I would totally vote for her.

Hillary Rodham Clinton, in 2002, declared that Saddam Hussein, “left unchecked will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter ... more >

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/17/joseph-curl-hillary-clinton-supported-iraq-war-bef/#ixzz3eyoCS2yF
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
 
K

kangosna745

Well-Known Member
Bernie Sanders 2016!!! Don Trump and Hills can load that clown car up and head off to a circus, we've got a nation to rebuild and don't need any evil lying plutocrats stealing more from the people than they already have...
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
kangosna745 said:
Bernie Sanders 2016!!! Don Trump and Hills can load that clown car up and head off to a circus, we've got a nation to rebuild and don't need any evil lying plutocrats stealing more from the people than they already have...
Click to expand...
we finally have someone..it's up to you and me to spread the word in our communities..if YOU want this..it's going to take a lot of work to undo what has been done to the people.

bernie supporters are counting on each other and all you have to do is open up the conversation..
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
oh! and at the same point in obamas 2008 campaign from 2007:

In February, Mr. Obama drew 20,000 people to the Town Lake in Austin, Texas. In March, 10,000 people crowded into a plaza outside City Hall in Oakland, Calif. In April, he attracted 20,000 at an outdoor rally at Yellow Jacket Park in Atlanta.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/27/obama-rallies-huge-crowd-in-new-york/?_r=0

in june, bernie drew 10,000 at UVM and didn't even have to pay anyone to attend..soooo, i'm thinkin', that we're all thinkin', we want a change.

PS the black vote hasn't even discovered this man..yet:mrgreen:
 
WeedFreak78

WeedFreak78

Well-Known Member
The Clinton's have been involved in questionable activities and scandals since before they were in the national light. Why anyone would think they are good candidates for president boggles me. The bush family too, I don't understand how Americans can know about some of this stuff..and acknowledge it, yet still think these people are trustworthy.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
WeedFreak78 said:
The Clinton's have been involved in questionable activities and scandals since before they were in the national light. Why anyone would think they are good candidates for president boggles me. The bush family too, I don't understand how Americans can know about some of this stuff..and acknowledge it, yet still think these people are trustworthy.
Click to expand...
personally, i'd be willing to explore the 3rd term model. it would assist in cutting the deficit with one less inauguration and all the parties..why do we have to do this?

the answer is..so many people don't get involved because they don't think they matter..and they're right..this next election is gong to be a litmus..this is our opportunity to make a change..bernie sanders ownes no one and has an awesome voting record..he is the voice of reason and compromise.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
the topper is that romney said outright that this is exactly what he would do.



Click to expand...
was that before or after the 47% luncheon? imho that was the moment..no recovery possible..then the audacity to meet with CU 2014 'the 47%' can be spun..baby bush..as much of a loser he and his family are (living in florida gives you a real good up close and personal) (wife and kids) shit they've done..how are they gonna even keep this under wraps?

my kids don't have any mugshots and don't do drugs.

all these righties..why are their kids so fucked up?

can you say...SATAN?

now you can see the difference in religious household versus non in the milenium?
 
WeedFreak78

WeedFreak78

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
personally, i'd be willing to explore the 3rd term model.
Click to expand...
Ummm, no. :| I don't like it when we get a 2 consecutive term pres. With the type of egomaniacal personality that wants to be president, I wouldn't want to feed into that for more than we already do. Just a taste of the candy, not the whole box.

schuylaar said:
the answer is..so many people don't get involved because they don't think they matter..and they're right..this next election is gong to be a litmus..this is our opportunity to make a change..bernie sanders ownes no one and has an awesome voting record..he is the voice of reason and compromise.
Click to expand...
I personally think we have very little to do with the outcome. Our votes are probably considered, but that's about it. You and I both know we will only hear about Bernie until the primaries are over, and even them, in limited quantities. Then it will be the 2 big boys.. Giant Douche or Turd Sandwich...and all the 3rd parties will fade away. I think we would be much better off if he was president, but it won't happen.

2016
upload_2015-7-6_13-35-37.jpeg
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
WeedFreak78 said:
Ummm, no. :| I don't like it when we get a 2 consecutive term pres. With the type of egomaniacal personality that wants to be president, I wouldn't want to feed into that for more than we already do. Just a taste of the candy, not the whole box.



I personally think we have very little to do with the outcome. Our votes are probably considered, but that's about it. You and I both know we will only hear about Bernie until the primaries are over, and even them, in limited quantities. Then it will be the 2 big boys.. Giant Douche or Turd Sandwich...and all the 3rd parties will fade away. I think we would be much better off if he was president, but it won't happen.

2016
View attachment 3454673
Click to expand...
um, well there is this..


and this:



you seriously don't think 'we the people' had anything to do with this?..you're wrong.
 
WeedFreak78

WeedFreak78

Well-Known Member
I just don't like the fact of one person holding that much power for a long period of time, relative to a human life. Even if "We the people" want it..we aren't a direct democracy for a reason and i don't want to become a dictatorship under any future presidents because a precedent was set to allow for extra terms. We only set term limits not that long ago..let's let them do their thing. Everyone wants change right? Change is good..
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
was that before or after the 47% luncheon? imho that was the moment..no recovery possible..then the audacity to meet with CU 2014 'the 47%' can be spun..baby bush..as much of a loser he and his family are (living in florida gives you a real good up close and personal) (wife and kids) shit they've done..how are they gonna even keep this under wraps?

my kids don't have any mugshots and don't do drugs.

all these righties..why are their kids so fucked up?

can you say...SATAN?

now you can see the difference in religious household versus non in the milenium?
Click to expand...
the smirking disaster happened after the 47% remarks, where he said in advance he would do exactly what he did.

Audience member: If you get the call as president, and you had hostages…Ronald Reagan was able to make a statement, even before he became, was actually sworn in—

Romney: Yeah—

Audience member: the hostages were released—

Romney: on the day of his inauguration, yeah.

Audience member: So my question is, really, how can you sort of duplicate that scenario?

Romney: Ohhhh. [A few chuckles in audience.] I'm gonna ask you, how do I duplicate that scenario.

Audience member: I think that had to do with the fact that the Iranians perceived Reagan would do something to really get them out. In other words [unintelligible]…and that's why I'm suggesting that something that you say over the next few months gets the Iranians to understand that their pursuit of the bomb is something that you would predict and I think that's something that could possibly resonate very well with American Republican voters.

Romney: I appreciate the idea. I can't—one of the other things that's frustrating to me is that at a typical day like this, when I do three or four events like this, the number of foreign policy questions that I get are between zero and one. And the American people are not concentrated at all on China, on Russia, Iran, Iraq. This president's failure to put in place a status forces agreement allowing 10-20,000 troops to stay in Iraq? Unthinkable! And yet, in that election, in the Jimmy Carter election, the fact that we have hostages in Iran, I mean, that was all we talked about. And we had the two helicopters crash in the desert, I mean that's—that was—that was the focus, and so him solving that made all the difference in the world. I'm afraid today if you said, "We got Iran to agree to stand down a nuclear weapon," they'd go hold on. It's really a, but…by the way, if something of that nature presents itself, I will work to find a way to take advantage of the opportunity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top