record low maximum arctic sea ice

freddfish

Well-Known Member
That I'm still waiting for someone to cite a peer reviewed research study which contradicts the vast majority of climate scientists.
Yeah, I got that part.

What I' m not clear about is when, exactly, this all got to be my problem. Are you saying you can't do your own web searches, and need my help?

And if so, how much will this pay me?
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Yeah, I got that part.

What I' m not clear about is when, exactly, this all got to be my problem. Are you saying you can't do your own web searches, and need my help?

And if so, how much will this pay me?
Hey, carry on, don't let facts (or in your case a lack of facts) keep you from offering your opinion on climate science.
 

freddfish

Well-Known Member
Hey, carry on, don't let facts (or in your case a lack of facts) keep you from offering your opinion on climate science.
OK, great. I was worried for a bit that I would have to teach you how to use your web browser.

By a happy coincidence, I teach IT classes on the side. Right up my alley...but only it pays good.

Well....glad we got that straightened out. Cheers!
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
OK, great. I was worried for a bit that I would have to teach you how to use your web browser.

By a happy coincidence, I teach IT classes on the side. Right up my alley...but only it pays good.

Well....glad we got that straightened out. Cheers!
Oh, so you're aware of the dearth of peer-reviewed research contradicting the vast majority of climate scientists. So you know your opinion in the thread is worthless yet you argue it anyway.

That makes you stupid. Glad we cleared that up.
 

freddfish

Well-Known Member
Well, that was quite a jump. Gratuitous insult, personal attack, all the usual trolling MO.

Took me a little longer than usual to take your measure, but I have it now. Ennui on my part, with your yapping dog content. ...Not my first rodeo, lad.

Well, work out whatever has your drawers in a wad (may I suggest, perhaps, a nice pipefull of Sour Diesel?), and try not to take yourself so seriously, OK?

No one else does, after all...

Cheers! :bigjoint:
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Well, that was quite a jump. Gratuitous insult, personal attack, all the usual trolling MO.

Took me a little longer than usual to take your measure, but I have it now. Ennui on my part, with your yapping dog content. ...Not my first rodeo, lad.

Well, work out whatever has your drawers in a wad (may I suggest, perhaps, a nice pipefull of Sour Diesel?), and try not to take yourself so seriously, OK?

No one else does, after all...

Cheers! :bigjoint:
Just one other question, can you please cite a peer-reviewed research study which contradicts the vast majority of climate scientists?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
NASA,paid by the government, so were the big foot scientist researchers in Oregon,
34 acadamys of science, also paid by the government,
if I remember right at one time the government was saying the only good indian is a dead one,
their soldiers drank the cool aid too, thousands of them running all over the place killing Indians,
cause the only good Indian is a dead one, the history of this country is full of people just like you who drank the cool aid,
I suppose you believe the governments GDP numbers, their unemployment numbers and their inflation numbers, If the government says it it must be true right?
Just like when obamao said we need solar power and wind power, then all his cronies got big fat government contracts making solar panels got rich, then all filed bankruptcy and walked out with billions in tax payer dollars,
keep drinking the cool aid
..and the government paid by the ruling class..yada, yada.
 

freddfish

Well-Known Member
Just one other question, can you please cite a peer-reviewed research study which contradicts the vast majority of climate scientists?
Well, that was politely asked, and rates an honest and civil reply. Good deal.

The short answer is, quite simply, that I am unsure if I can provide you with that sort of data, as I have not done any searches for (your words) "peer reviewed research" in this area. And it must be pointed out... a previous attempt at this in an earlier post by another poster didn't meet your standards, so I am not sure what will satisfy you as a credible source.

With all due respect, I never doubted that the climate is changing... I believe it is.

What I have issues with are the notions that it is all man-made, or that mankind can somehow fix it, or that there can be no debate about it. (That's not objective research... It is mere zealotry)

I hope, if we are to go on with this discussion, we can do it in a civil and respectful fashion. I'm up for it.

Cheers!
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
I slammed the door in your face, your long lying nose went through the panel and I bent it over,....so there you`ll stay...,
 

Rrog

Well-Known Member
I've found it a waste of my personal time to argue with the brainwashed.

A "scientist" blogger will garner huge internet traffic by being a science denier. No mystery.

There's some black dude with a youtube channel and all he does is bash black people. He's super popular. Fulla shit, but popular.

If I wanted huge web hits and the $$ that comes with it, I'd be controversial. Like a black man ridiculing black folks. Or a scientist denying science. Both are BS marketing for clicks.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
That's what I said.

yup, but you tried to make it out to be the bloggers data. It`s not it is a list of studies made easy to access.

Go through every one of those studies conveniently listed by a blogger.

But don`t try and sell the readers here that the blog is the blogger`s opinion or data. It`s just like you posting a link to me.
 
Top