GOP 3rd ranking house member addressed white supremacists

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Dude, let it go that Cheney is equivalent to a legal murderer and torturer? Ordering torture is worthy of crime no matter what crazy mixed up argument you can come up with, EVER.

Those with money and power attempt to be above those of us who are 'plebeians,' your attitude furthers their grip on our nation.

You are not an idiot, far from it! Your attitude is stupid though.
If we held presidents to the same standards as his loyal subjects, which ones wouldn't be prosecuted for crimes? I can't think of any.

Bushney sucks, but they never drone bombed a citizen without due process. Obama bragged about it.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2486809/New-book-claims-President-Obama-bragged-aides-using-drone-strikes.html
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
A great one was the idea that any bottled water that contacted the Iraqi soil/sand immediately became 'non-potable.' Bullshit. It must have been many millions of bottles and the potable water in them wasted because there was dust on the OUTSIDE of the bottle. Who put out that idiot idea?

I miss having random pallets of water sitting around to grab a bottle from though.

I was one of the last groups to leave the Iraqi theatre, our hospital was in Tallil that deployment. When we wrapped it up instead of bringing everything home we left it. CHU after CHU with their AC units, the copper wire, all that infrastructure they built up for so long. So many portable containers that could be easily shipped. They just left it. More then six hundred thousand dollars of class VIII was in my inventory in the ER, we just left it.

Must have been more cost effective to not transport it to Kuwait or Qatar, I find that hard to believe though.

I guess it was nice they redeployed the CT machines and X-ray ISOs and most small portable durable equipment, ventilators, etc.

Then two years later ISIS overruns the exact hospital I treated patients in.

What. The. Fuck.

<sarcasm>
Totally worth the lives of servicemembers and the loss of their limbs and quality of life.
</sarcasm>
I had KP in Kandahar that's where I saw the army and KBR competing to see who could waste the most. By the end of Iraq though, they must have had some serious wasting to finish in order to leave, I can only imagine.
 

AlecTheGardener

Well-Known Member
@NLXSK1

Peruse this for a moment: meet the press transcript. When I was watching I was actually laughing hard at some of his answers, that man is a cowardly rich man who hides behind other people and policies. He took series of sentences and completely fucked them into confusion:
DICK CHENEY:

Morning, Chuck. It's good to be back.



CHUCK TODD:

Well, let me start with quoting you. You said earlier this week, "Torture was something that was very carefully avoided." It implies that you have a definition of what torture is. What is it?



DICK CHENEY:

advertisement

Well, torture, to me, Chuck, is an American citizen on a cell phone making a last call to his four young daughters shortly before he burns to death in the upper levels of the Trade Center in New York City on 9/11. There's this notion that somehow there's moral equivalence between what the terrorists and what we do. And that's absolutely not true. We were very careful to stop short of torture. The Senate has seen fit to label their report torture. But we worked hard to stay short of that definition.



CHUCK TODD:

Well, what is that definition?



DICK CHENEY:

Definitions, and one that was provided by the Office of Legal Counsel, we went specifically to them because we did not want to cross that line into where we violating some international agreement that we'd signed up to. They specifically authorized and okayed, for example, exactly what we did. All of the techniques that were authorized by the president were, in effect, blessed by the Justice Department opinion that we could go forward with those without, in fact, committing torture.

advertisement



CHUCK TODD:

Let me go through some of those techniques that were used, Majid Khan, was subjected to involuntary rectal feeding and rectal hydration. It included two bottles of Ensure, later in the same day Majid Khan's lunch tray consisting of hummus, pasta, sauce, nuts and raisins was pureed and rectally infused.



DICK CHENEY:

That wasn't--



advertisement

CHUCK TODD:

Does that meet the definition of torture?



DICK CHENEY:

--that does not meet the definition of what was used in the program as--

(OVERTALK)



advertisement

CHUCK TODD:

I understand. But does that meet the definition of torture in your mind?



DICK CHENEY:

--in my mind, I've told you what meets the definition of torture. It's what 19 guys armed with airline tickets and box cutters did to 3,000 Americans on 9/11. What was done here apparently certainly was not one of the techniques that was approved. I believe it was done for medical reasons.



CHUCK TODD:

advertisement

I mean, medical community has said there is no medical--

(OVERTALK)



DICK CHENEY:

If you go and look, for example, at Jose Rodriguez book, and he was the guy running the program, he's got a very clear description of how, in fact, the program operated. With respect to that I think the agency has answered it and its response to the committee report and I--



CHUCK TODD:

advertisement

--but you acknowledge this was over and above.



DICK CHENEY:

--that was not something that was done as part of the interrogation program.



CHUCK TODD:

But you won't call it torture.

advertisement



DICK CHENEY:

It wasn't torture in terms of it wasn't part of the program.



CHUCK TODD:

Let me ask you this, we've got Riyadh al-Najjar. He had handcuffing on one or both of his wrists to an overhead bar, would not allow him to lower his arms. Twenty-two hours each day for two consecutive days in order to break his resistance. Al-Najjar was also wearing a diaper and had no access to toilet facility. Was that acknowledged? Was that part of the program that you approved?



@ginwilly
You know I dislike ANY loss of life, I have spoken against Obama and his signature assassinations before on this board.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Obama is not going to get impeached for the constitutional bullshit he is pulling
why would someone get impeached for acting constitutionally?

:lol:

i go off and trim for a few hours and you have a complete meltdown. this is too good.
 

AlecTheGardener

Well-Known Member
Everything that was in the program was not torture, but if it fell out of te program by definition it wasn't torture?

What the fuck? Literal nonsense.


Except ONE THING: anal rehydration actually is a treatment, granted that is after you have tried about a dozen other interventions to hydrate your patient.

NOT anal feeding, that is some CIA officers and human intelligence collectors getting kinky for themselves.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Kerry asked to go to war in Syria because of the chemical weapons. He wanted to go in and "drop a few bombs" and the lefties on the board were all behind him. Pull that old thread up if you want a laugh. The admins story changed every couple of days and so did the opinions on the board.

Now they are supporting Obama's war with ISIS after we armed them. We are fighting FOR Assad now instead of "dropping a few bombs" on him. Nothing has changed, either Assad gassed his people like the admin team claimed or he didn't. Our allies are fighting on the same side as ISIS while we continue the war drums. We arm them, then fight them, then elevate them, then replace them.

But lets focus on Cheney.

Meanwhile, Obama has bombed seven countries in six years.

Booooosh!!!
your posting record at pocket fives goes back well into the bush years.

not a peep from you then.

what happened so suddenly once the black guy took office, brightboy?

:lol:
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
AL Gore and Clinton both profited on wars they started?
They made bank on the deaths of others?
You know, it would have been simple for you to show how Cheney profited from the war by showing how his options or whatever were worth more because of the war as opposed to if there hadn't been a war. But you never did. You ASSUMED he did, with no cause other than your hatred for him. Then you pretend your ASSUMPTION of his guilt justifies your hatred. Your entire view of anything you disagree with is hatred. Your hatred blinds you. You are not only a fool, but a dangerous fool.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
This is what I called you out on when you were losing the debate with Red....

Round and Round
Calling those who disagree with them "stupid" or "retard"is the go-to defense of their positions. That and a layer of half-truths and out right lies they just keep re-posting. It's an organized campaign. As a registered Democrat, I get the talking point emails all the time. Ever watch the news ticker on MSNBC? They have a steady stream of partisan lies scrolling across the screen all day from "the viewing public". The network can't say these things because they would be sued for libel, so they use this ploy to spread their hate speech. People believe their shit because they want to blame their failures on "the man". This is the major flaw with Democracy. The majority of people are idiots and we let the idiots make the decisions.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
What about Cheney are you also "unsure" about him making a profit off the war in Iraq.
What about Cheney are you also "sure" about him making a profit off the war in Iraq? Come on, lets see your proof. So far, all you've done is say those that don't agree with you are stupid. That has been your ONLY evidence. Sorry, but your hate filled assumptions are not enough. That they are for you is proof your opinions are based in hate, not facts.
 
Top