Police intelligence targets cash and compete to become a "Royal Knight".

TheMan13

Well-Known Member
Cops are seizing hundreds of millions of dollars from drivers and bragging about it in chat rooms

This weekend, The Washington Post published a deeply reported look at "highway interdiction," a controversial tactic that has allowed police to seize hundreds of millions of dollars from motorists without formally charging anyone with a crime. Typically, police will stop a driver under suspicion of drug trafficking, seize their cash as evidence, and refuse to return it without a legal challenge. Only one in six seizures were challenged, typically because of the high cost of legal assistance.

But the legal justification is only part of the practice. As private consultants sought to expand the practice, they turned to surprisingly familiar methods, including an encrypted chat room where officers could brag about their latest hauls, share tactics, and spread private information about juicy targets passing through other jurisdictions. Known as the Black Asphalt Electronic Networking and Notification System, the chat room has over 25,000 members spread across the country, most of whom are law enforcement officers. Until recently, it was hosted at a DEA intelligence center, but has never received any official government oversight. Within the system, officers are encouraged to brag about particularly big hauls, and the member with the highest seizure total at the end of the year is dubbed a "Royal Knight."

In other words, it's Reddit for the highway interdiction, turning an otherwise sketchy practice into a game of online oneupmanship. If highway cops aren't encouraged to make seizures within their department, they can get that encouragement online, with plenty of other interdiction-happy cops cheering them on. And the encouragement works: seizures have more than tripled since 2000. Any dissenting voices, worried about the legal or moral implications of grabbing cash based on the thinnest tissue of reasonable suspicion, are kept out of the conversation entirely.
By Russell Brandom of theverge.com

The original/entire Washington Post article: "Police intelligence targets cash"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2014/09/07/police-intelligence-targets-cash/
 

TheMan13

Well-Known Member
"Only one in six seizures were challenged, typically because of the high cost of legal assistance." Hundreds of millions of dollars seized without a warrant, indictment and/or charges. How is this not a criminal racket or highway robbery to be exact?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Cops are seizing hundreds of millions of dollars from drivers and bragging about it in chat rooms

This weekend, The Washington Post published a deeply reported look at "highway interdiction," a controversial tactic that has allowed police to seize hundreds of millions of dollars from motorists without formally charging anyone with a crime. Typically, police will stop a driver under suspicion of drug trafficking, seize their cash as evidence, and refuse to return it without a legal challenge. Only one in six seizures were challenged, typically because of the high cost of legal assistance.

But the legal justification is only part of the practice. As private consultants sought to expand the practice, they turned to surprisingly familiar methods, including an encrypted chat room where officers could brag about their latest hauls, share tactics, and spread private information about juicy targets passing through other jurisdictions. Known as the Black Asphalt Electronic Networking and Notification System, the chat room has over 25,000 members spread across the country, most of whom are law enforcement officers. Until recently, it was hosted at a DEA intelligence center, but has never received any official government oversight. Within the system, officers are encouraged to brag about particularly big hauls, and the member with the highest seizure total at the end of the year is dubbed a "Royal Knight."

In other words, it's Reddit for the highway interdiction, turning an otherwise sketchy practice into a game of online oneupmanship. If highway cops aren't encouraged to make seizures within their department, they can get that encouragement online, with plenty of other interdiction-happy cops cheering them on. And the encouragement works: seizures have more than tripled since 2000. Any dissenting voices, worried about the legal or moral implications of grabbing cash based on the thinnest tissue of reasonable suspicion, are kept out of the conversation entirely.
By Russell Brandom of theverge.com

The original/entire Washington Post article: "Police intelligence targets cash"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2014/09/07/police-intelligence-targets-cash/
This DIRECTLY CONTRADICTS The People's right to due process in any search or seizure. Any first year DA's assistant knows it, so how does the Federal Government get away with it?

Oh yeah, because they don't seize cash from the ultra wealthy- they're stealing cash from their competition; We the People.
 

TheMan13

Well-Known Member
This DIRECTLY CONTRADICTS The People's right to due process in any search or seizure. Any first year DA's assistant knows it, so how does the Federal Government get away with it?

Oh yeah, because they don't seize cash from the ultra wealthy- they're stealing cash from their competition; We the People.
The government could do a lot better actually indicting and convicting the criminal ultra wealthy plaguing our society.

David Nicoll's 5 million dollar collection of "Blood Muscle" cars are heading to auction:

http://www.fbi.gov/newark/press-releases/2013/clinical-laboratory-president-and-new-jersey-doctor-others-charged-with-company-in-multi-million-dollar-cash-for-referral-scheme
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
The government is owned and operated by those very same ultra rich and will not bite its masters willingly.

We the People must make our collective voices heard and demand a return to fairness and equal representation- or we will decide as a Free People to create another government that better respects our needs.
 

GregS

Well-Known Member
This is a point that I believe could and should be included in the harsh correction of police forces by the Justice Department that the Ferguson issue brought to the fore. Additionally, the judiciary must be investigated closely to close the gap between citizen criminality and police misconduct criminality. I have a lot on my plate and wish to write letters to the key people in this. Won't you too please consider the same.
 

Dr.Pecker

Well-Known Member
should it be a scary magazine cutout letter with some flour in it or just the normal boring kind of letter?
 

TheMan13

Well-Known Member
This is a point that I believe could and should be included in the harsh correction of police forces by the Justice Department that the Ferguson issue brought to the fore. Additionally, the judiciary must be investigated closely to close the gap between citizen criminality and police misconduct criminality. I have a lot on my plate and wish to write letters to the key people in this. Won't you too please consider the same.
Any thoughts of invoking the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act

These acts are now codified by the US Justice Department's Division of Asset Forfeitures all the way down to the local police department. How have we got to the point that no separations exists to provide the checks and balances required by the Constitution? We rely upon the DoJ (judicial) to protect most of these rights violated by their own DEA (executive). I say indict everyone of them from the County Deputy Sheriff doing these seizures and all the way up to the USAG. Address the whole game at once: Game Over :bigjoint:
 
Last edited:

GregS

Well-Known Member
It is not only asset forfeiture, but sentencing that goes ultra light for law officers for heinous crimes against citizens that plays a big part. Many times there is no punishment,
 

TheMan13

Well-Known Member
It is not only asset forfeiture, but sentencing that goes ultra light for law officers for heinous crimes against citizens that plays a big part. Many times there is no punishment,
Without the necessary separation of powers as it relates to our criminal courts and law enforcement, you have what we have here. They're all on the same team with shared goals, yet "justice" is not a team sport. Again the systematic and organized maleficence we find today could and should be addressed as a whole and I would suggest with an act it created: RICO.
 

GregS

Well-Known Member
I have not heard anyone banging the drum over this as I'd expected to over Ferguson. It is a more than pertinent argument.
 

TheMan13

Well-Known Member
I have not heard anyone banging the drum over this as I'd expected to over Ferguson. It is a more than pertinent argument.
I hear you brother. I was thinking that the William Reddie's killing and the two others following in less than a year by Deputy Sheriffs in that tiny community would finally draw answers. Ferguson seems to be more about race hustling politics and regulatory capture rather than providing federal review and protections to citizens from the core problem of judicial and law enforcement abuses effecting this entire country.
 
Top