Calling All Racists..... a new vacation destination

[UncleBuck]

So, you'd rather fuck a dude. I figured with the compulsion you show to penises.

i'd rather fuck neither.

 

[DonAlejandroVega]

LOL.....good thing he is composed entirely of pudding......or that would have hurt.

 

[Rob Roy]

You got Amish written all over you Rob Roy Miller...now off to the Midwest you go.

Actually that's your mothers phone number written on my forearm, she didn't have a piece of paper

My goal is to assure that we don't go back to the past. Rob Roy Miller and others want that to happen. Feel Civil Rights are not needed.

Your goal can never be met, if you employ the same tactics (force) that were used in the past. Dizzy yet? You should be.

The term "civil rights" is oxymoronic. It first strips a right from all individuals to freely determine their human interactions on a consensual basis and replaces that right with an edict that threatens force if people do not comply with a forced association they would not freely choose. Rape much?


How does threatening force against a peaceful person further your goals?

I know you can't and won't answer my question because you are caught in a contradiction and you have a slight comprehension problem. That's why it's easier to talk about Amish beards and shit like that.

 

[Yessica...]

Actually that's your mothers phone number written on my forearm, she didn't have a piece of paper






Your goal can never be met, if you employ the same tactics (force) that were used in the past. Dizzy yet? You should be.

The term "civil rights" is oxymoronic. It first strips a right from all individuals to freely determine their human interactions on a consensual basis and replaces that right with an edict that threatens force if people do not comply with a forced association they would not freely choose. Rape much?


How does threatening force against a peaceful person further your goals?

I know you can't and won't answer my question because you are caught in a contradiction and you have a slight comprehension problem. That's why it's easier to talk about Amish beards and shit like that.

bahahahahahahahahahahahaha

That's good.

 

[Rob Roy]

So basically you're just here to hang onto Uncle Buck's nut sack.

Tough neighborhood. Gangs of drunken gerbils dangling from every pubic hair.

 

[Rob Roy]

I have done an analysis on both BnB's posts and on SmokeyDan's and I have concluded they are one and the same.

That is a good thing. BnB and SmokeyDan are A-OK in my book!

Thank you for your service.

 

[skunkd0c]

Jew watch!
http://www.jewwatch.com/

keep both eyes upon the jew at all times

 

[Rob Roy]

wait, i thought you said you would choose to serve black people if you owned a business.

now you're saying that you have to be forced against your will to serve black people?

that doesn't make any sense.

If I owned a business I would trade with those that I chose to and that also agreed to trade with me. I would exclude some people, but their race would not be the determinant.

For instance a person that shit on the floor of the bathroom at my business, would not be welcome. Sorry, I hope you understand that means you.

I don't respond well to people trying to force me to do things, so if somebody came to my business, say a prohibitionist lap dog like you, a KKK dickhead, a race card whiner or a gerbil posing as a dope grower and told me I must serve them or engage in some kind of trade, I'd probably tell them to shit in their hat.

What doesn't make sense is your cognitive dissonance. You think by using force as the primary ingredient in a plan, you can also make the plan just and remove inequity.....that's dumb....very dumb.

 

[skunkd0c]

If I owned a business I would trade with those that I chose to and that also agreed to trade with me. I would exclude some people, but their race would not be the determinant.

For instance a person that shit on the floor of the bathroom at my business, would not be welcome. Sorry, I hope you understand that means you.

I don't respond well to people trying to force me to do things, so if somebody came to my business, say a prohibitionist lap dog like you, a KKK dickhead, a race card whiner or a gerbil posing as a dope grower and told me I must serve them or engage in some kind of trade, I'd probably tell them to shit in their hat.

What doesn't make sense is your cognitive dissonance. You think by using force as the primary ingredient in a plan, you can also make the plan just and remove inequity.....that's dumb....very dumb.

do you have to give up any rights as an individual that you would have when at home
if you enter into the public to trade with others ?

 

[Rob Roy]

that has nothing to do with your love of "freedom of choice".

i wanted you to tell me all about the "freedom of choice" that blacks got to enjoy before civil rights.

Blacks had limited options when the coercive government made laws that restricted their choices of association, such as who they could marry etc.

So in order to "correct" this, the coercive government did the exact wrong thing, which was to force people to associate even if some people preferred not to.

When people are forced to associate it is just the other side of the coin that says they can't associate.

Coercive government "SOLUTIONS"= nobody wins!!! Hooray!!!



I think human interactions should be determined by the parties interacting, not you, not me or any other party that is not part of the interaction. You don't. That makes you an advocate for forcing peaceful or indifferent people to do things they don't want to....rapist.

 

[Rob Roy]

do you have to give up any rights as an individual that you would have when at home
if you enter into the public to trade with others ?

Two ways to answer that.

In the present legal scheme, the law does first take away a persons right of self determination.

There is no such thing as "public trade". That is a created fiction. When we trade with people it involves an exchange with an individual, not the public in general.

I believe all exchanges in order to be just, must be free of coercion. Do you?

 

[skunkd0c]

Two ways to answer that.

In the present legal scheme, the law does first take away a persons right of self determination.

There is no such thing as "public trade". That is a created fiction. When we trade with people it involves an exchange with an individual, not the public in general.

I believe all exchanges to be just, must be free of coercion. Do you?

i do not have a answer sorry, only questions .. thoughts
when you use the government money system to trade with i would assume you need to abide by certain laws that would forbid you to exclude trade from
certain people based on race or whatever

where if you were at home you could exclude from your home whomever you wanted based on race or whatever criteria you choose
everyone has the right to be a racist at home if they wish, but when trading in public i would assume the law forbids this

for example if i opened a cake shop and i erected a sign that said

fairy cakes for white people £1.00 each
fairy cakes for black people £2.00 each

i do not think this would be allowed .. but should it be ?

 

[Rob Roy]

i do not have a answer sorry, only questions .. thoughts
when you use the government money system to trade with i would assume you need to abide by certain laws that would forbid you to exclude trade from
certain people based on race or whatever

where if you were at home you could exclude from your home whomever you wanted based on race or whatever criteria you choose
everyone has the right to be a racist at home if they wish, but when trading in public i would assume the law forbids this

for example if i opened a cake shop and i erected a sign that said

fairy cakes for white people £1.00 each
fairy cakes for black people £2.00 each

i do not think this would be allowed .. but should it be ?

First of all thank you for the questions.

Price negotiation should be between the engaged and equally willing parties, not disinterested parties and especially not by a coercive government.


Laws do not determine morality, they only promise punishment for disobedience.

 

[skunkd0c]

First of all thank you for the questions.

Price negotiation should be between the engaged and equally willing parties, not disinterested parties and especially not by a coercive government.


Laws do not determine morality, they only promise punishment for disobedience.

this kind of thing ^^ happened in Ireland .. the Catholics were not happy about it since they were on the receiving end

it saddens me to say this but many people have been dehumanized by government/societies teachings
many people are more brutal than government
left to people themselves i'm certain the punishment for disobedience would be equally as harmful if not more violent

i do not feel any solidarity towards other unknown individuals or government, they are both potential threats

how does your point work the other way round from the point of view of a worker not a seller or buyer?
for example
if government does not set standards of some kind it would be legal for white folk to work for £2 per day ?
and black folk to work for £1 per day .. as long as both parties agree ?

 

[schuylaar]

restricting millions of black people to a smaller and inferior set of goods and services due to hostile racism: tell me why you like it.

isn't that the definition of wal-mart?

 

[londonfog]

Actually that's your mothers phone number written on my forearm, she didn't have a piece of paper





.

Thanks for letting me know that mothers are fair game.

 

[DonAlejandroVega]

this kind of thing ^^ happened in Ireland .. the Catholics were not happy about it since they were on the receiving end

it saddens me to say this but many people have been dehumanized by government/societies teachings
many people are more brutal than government
left to people themselves i'm certain the punishment for disobedience would be equally as harmful if not more violent

i do not feel any solidarity towards other unknown individuals or government, they are both potential threats

how does your point work the other way round from the point of view of a worker not a seller or buyer?
for example
if government does not set standards of some kind it would be legal for white folk to work for £2 per day ?
and black folk to work for £1 per day .. as long as both parties agree ?

people who dehumanize others are nothing but animals..............

 

[DonAlejandroVega]

Thanks for letting me know that mothers are fair game.

 

[sheskunk]

If civil rights were to be abolished would the racists win? Would people immediately start buying and selling slaves? Would we really go back to the way it was?

This whole conversation is ridiculous.

 

[SmokeyDan]

i'd rather fuck neither.

I don't actually have a sister, so it is a completely hypothetical situation for me, and i don't fully understand the brother/sister dynamic, but I can't imagine any semi-normal vagina I'd turn down in favor of a dude.