400 watt air cooled hood question.

Just need a quick clarification on a few thangs.
I'm going to be using a 400 watt air cooled hood in a 5x4x8, and I'm trying to nail down what I want to do with ventilation. Saw this picture in a different thread they said the #2 fan wasn't necessary as passive intake would be enough. Is this true? I'm going to use a 6" hydrofarm inline and I'll have a regular fan in there too. How's that sound to you? Also, the exhaust opening should be 2x the intake size right? Thanks.
 

purplehays1

Well-Known Member
This setup will work perfectly fine as long as the intake hole is large enough and the intake temps are like 70-75 degrees or lower.

I suggest u actually put the inline fan in the attic where your exhaust is leaving, but either will work
 

Attachments

It is a sealed room, and the exhaust will be going outside.

Yeah, okay makes sense still curious why you suggest that though? I plan on having a DIY carbon filter there and the passive intake at #2. So, if I put the inline up at the exhaust will the carbon filter still be good in it's original location?
 
Last edited:

GrowerGoneWild

Well-Known Member
Should work out fine.. Its ideal IMHO that you remove the passive intake fan, so the air doesnt leak out. All air gets processed through the carbon air filter.
 

UncleBurnie

Active Member
You're good, but I second what purplehays1 said. The fan should be close to the exhaust outlet. Fans are more efficient pulling air through, than pushing it. Also keep the duct bends to a minimum to maximize flow.
 

purplehays1

Well-Known Member
It is a sealed room, and the exhaust will be going outside.

Yeah, okay makes sense still curious why you suggest that though? I plan on having a DIY carbon filter there and the passive intake at #2. So, if I put the inline up at the exhaust will the carbon filter still be good in it's original location?

The filter will work perfectly fine where it is in the picture, when the fan is too close to the filter i have found the filters to not work as well. And as the preious poster stated these centrifusal fans are intended to suck air through ducting, not push it. Your flow and the filters effectiveness will be better if the fan is moved to where my picture said, either in the room or on top of theroom, but sucking the air through the hood, not pushing it.
 

East Coast

Well-Known Member
This is my findings, in my environment.

IMG_0819.JPG 400w with hood. Hood as shown with straight ducting leading to nowhere. I found when set up like this, the heat build up inside hood, generally flowed outside without needing to exhaust. I do have a 150mm axial fan inline with the ducting however.

I have a carbon filter (hiding top left corner) connected to a 150mm centrifugal fan controlled via a variac. The variac at the moment is set to 60v, as it is middle of winter here, reports of snow tonight in a place that where normally a slight frost is uncommon!


IMG_0821.JPG From carbon filter directly up and out of tent to the centrifugal fan buried deep in the 44 gallon drum, surround by silencer batts. I still think, this is where you need to spend the money, exhaust fan and control. A cheap 150mm axial fan for the hood will do.

Both centrifugal and axial fan are connected to IMG_0826.JPG 1 of these digital thermostats that control flowering, mother, clone. The two dimmer controllers are for teh hood axial fan and the exhaust for flowering room. Variac for centrifugal main exhaust.

I was amazed how much heat moved from hood and out the duct without the fan going, natural flow. From now until mid summer, the ambient temperature is only going to rise, last summer I survived, few tweeks here and there, and I think summer for me this time around won't be too bad.

If you are mid summer now, you're temperatures are only going to start dropping.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Just need a quick clarification on a few thangs.
I'm going to be using a 400 watt air cooled hood in a 5x4x8, and I'm trying to nail down what I want to do with ventilation. Saw this picture in a different thread they said the #2 fan wasn't necessary as passive intake would be enough. Is this true? I'm going to use a 6" hydrofarm inline and I'll have a regular fan in there too. How's that sound to you? Also, the exhaust opening should be 2x the intake size right? Thanks.
If you go with a passive intake, it should be twice the size of the exhaust.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
It is a sealed room, and the exhaust will be going outside.

Yeah, okay makes sense still curious why you suggest that though? I plan on having a DIY carbon filter there and the passive intake at #2. So, if I put the inline up at the exhaust will the carbon filter still be good in it's original location?
It is clearly NOT a sealed room.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Incorrect; you need your exhaust larger than your intake as you need to create negative pressure. You always need to exhaust more air than you suck (or force in).

-spek
It is not possible to exhaust more air than you pull in without the tent or building collapsing. A PASSIVE intake should be twice the size of a POWERED exhaust.
 

purplehays1

Well-Known Member
If you go with a passive intake, it should be twice the size of the exhaust.
Atleast twice the size, u said u were running a 6" fan i would have like a 10x12 intake or more.

Yes, i took sealed room to mean besides the intake clearly not truly sealed.
 
Thanks for the posts everyone definitely cleared some things up. Yeah it's not sealed like a tent my bad just a simple wood room setup. Moving the fan towards the exhaust makes sense. Nice setup there too with the thermostat panel looks real nice.
 

purplehays1

Well-Known Member
i used your same setup for years with great success, with the fan in the attic and another fan exhausting the attic. But i was producing a lot more heat.
 
Top