Apparently, fuck the US constitution; Sodomy ruling not overturned regardless of Sup. Court decision

desert dude

Well-Known Member
so if you are for equal protection of the law, why would you rail against title II of civil rights, which gave them equal protection of the law at lunch counters, hotels, gas stations, and the like?

so i suppose you're all for gays being able to have a cake made at any shop they choose, right? or to have the flowers for their wedding arranged by the florist of their choice, right? and gays can have any photographer they choose cover their wedding, right?
Obviously, the NAACP should be forced to elect a skinhead as their president. Duh.

Freedumz!!!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Obviously, the NAACP should be forced to elect a skinhead as their president. Duh.

Freedumz!!!
way to dodge the question about your hatred for the 14th amendment. your former group mates from the white nationalists and white separatists group would be proud.

the NAACP ha many people of all colors working for them though. probably no skinheads like you though.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
way to dodge the question about your hatred for the 14th amendment. your former group mates from the white nationalists and white separatists group would be proud.

the NAACP ha many people of all colors working for them though. probably no skinheads like you though.
The NAACP should be forced to admit white supremacists!

Freedum!!!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The NAACP should be forced to admit white supremacists!

Freedum!!!
as previously noted, the NAACP has people of all colors and creeds working for them.

but they do not have to hire white supremacists like you or your hero bignbushy, just as KFC does not have to hire militant vegans like the rabbit.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
as previously noted, the NAACP has people of all colors and creeds working for them.

but they do not have to hire white supremacists like you or your hero bignbushy, just as KFC does not have to hire militant vegans like the rabbit.
And that is clearly unconstitutional, right Buck?
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
The Congress shall have Power ... To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

The pope has to suck a dick on Easter Sunday in St Peter's (how appropriately named!) Basilica. It's the law!!

Freedum!!!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The pope has to suck a dick on Easter Sunday in St Peter's (how appropriately named!) Basilica. It's the law!!
you clearly don't get the difference between constitutional laws and unconstitutional ones.

civil rights is constitutional, much to your white nationalist dismay.
 

Ceepea

Well-Known Member
I have no problem at all with amending the constitution. That is constitutional. I am not going to chase down the multitude of posts about "written by old, white men who owned slaves". If you are interested, a good example of that sort of sneering disrespect toward the constitution and its authors is contained in the memo written by the dean (of something or other) at UCSB when explaining the recent incident where a professor of feminist studies assaulted a child and denied her the constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of speech.

That memo is diagnostic of the attitude of progressive leaders toward our constitutional republic. That attitude, if it succeeds, will come home to bite them in the ass, of course, when things like homosexuality are oppressed.
I thought that happened on private property?
 
Top