I don't think it proves the big bang theory. Where is the point the universe supposedly originated from? Don't say the middle, unless you claim the Earth is the center of the universeThe cosmic background radiation is literally a picture of the early universeLight spots are where matter coalesced into stars and galaxies, dark spots are where there is no matter, interstellar space Do you think they just made this up or what?
You have done nothing, other than shown you don't understand how the scientific method works and you can't distinguish between laymen terms and scientific terms.
Luckily, the reality of how the universe began doesn't depend upon your comprehension of it. PHEW! It's not irrational to the experts who study this on a day by day basis, and have an understanding of physics.
They postulated about bacground radiation before they knew it existed. They first came up with the big bang theory based on the red-shift, but there have been ample amounts of evidence collected since the Hubble constant.
So is Atomic theory, gravitational theory, cell theory, germ theory, and countless others. Just because it says theory doesn't mean it's less likely to be true. You depend on countless theories to 'be true' to perform various tasks throughout the day. You are the biggest type of moron, the one who denies the hand that feeds. You bask in scientific breakthroughs while condemning the methods in which they're provided to you, all the while being completely ignorant and scientifically illiterate.
These concepts are beyond your ability to grasp them. You simply can't understand them, that's why you don't accept them, that's the hard truth. It's like you walked into an operating room full of surgeons without ever having taken a single anatomy class. You point out that we can stop the bleeding of the patient on the table by shaving his hand and giving him some water, everyone else says that's retarded and you don't know what you're talking about. That's pretty much what's happening here.
It's funny you think you're smart. I guess that's why you aspire to reach that lofty goal of $900 a month.
What do you think the Theory of relativity is? It explains why things fall.... pick up a grade 9 science text book.
Actually, gravity is both a law and a theory - http://thehappyscientist.com/science-experiment/gravity-theory-or-law http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_gravitational_theory It's strange that you wouldn't do a quick google search before making such an erroneous statement. As Heis pointed out, the LAW of gravity describes WHAT happens by careful observation, analysis and testing. Gravitational THEORY explains WHY this happens. Theory NEVER 'graduates' into a law, never. They are 2 ver distinct things. Since theories are made up of many facts, stating facts are superior to theories is like taking a bed sheet and saying that the individual threads that the sheet consists of are superior to the entire bed sheet. To state a theory can become a law is to say that the bed sheet can 'graduate' to an individual thread. WTF? To posit that shows a lack of even basic scientific knowledge. I've pointed out an error on your part as you stated clearly above, 'There is no gravitational theory. There is a law of gravity. That's what they call a theory when they believe it has been proven'. You were clearly wrong. Lets' see if you have any integrity and are able to admit an error, or if you attempt to deflect, deny or rationalize your error. I know which my money's on, hope I'm wrong...
It's funny you think you're smart! It's already been demonstrated you're wrong about every scientific topic that comes up, but you'll keep providing the entertainment
I make twice what you do in a month every week. Lets not pretend you are even close to licking my boots.
So you want to argue semantics? Theories are not made up of facts. Theories are an attempt to explain facts. If you want to worship your "point" god, go right ahead. In the beginning, a tiny point too small to measure created the Heavens and the Earth. See, I support your right to worship in your own way, I wrote the first line of your holy script. Do I get to be a saint now?
It's been demonstrated you think I'm wrong. But then again you appear to be making less than a full-time minimum wage job would pay. That's a pretty good indicator of what your opinion is worth.It's funny you think you're smart! It's already been demonstrated you're wrong about every scientific topic that comes up, but you'll keep providing the entertainment
Hahahaha!!! Nothing worthwhile to say so you have to pretend to be a big shot in some other facet of your life. You are pathetic!
Me, everyone in this thread, every scientist on Earth, pretty much anyone who can tie their shoe..
Facts are observations that are repeatedly confirmed. Even then, a scientific fact is NEVER CERTAIN. Theories are built on facts and laws, and are again, repeatedly tested.
Look at this little man trying to pull out his wallet and act like it means anything here
Well, you and the other clown. You can't speak for any scientists at all. They sure don't speak to you. When they talk to me, and they do talk to me, they are always wanting me to make something for them. Fortunately for me, I can only work on DOE projects. An integrated science course sounds like general science with a fancy name. Required at my high school. Biology, check. Astronomy, nope. Majored in math, sciences, and social studies. Took college level math in high school for two credit hours transferable to any college. All while working part-time, nights and weekends. Had to work to help out the family so never could go to college. But I know the definition of "theory", more than you can say.
No, "I" am worth more. You may not like it, but money is how the world keeps score. You think anything means anything here? You are all people I will never meet. Your opinions mean nothing here. Lets be honest, YOUR opinions mean nothing anywhere. But enough of this, I have a job to go to tomorrow. Do you?
